Climate Change is a Touchy Subject

Published March 30th, 2017 by Bobby Henderson

Trump’s Whitehouse is pushing its science officials to shut up about Climate Change, reports Politico:

A supervisor at the Energy Department’s international climate office told staff this week not to use the phrases “climate change,” “emissions reduction” or “Paris Agreement” in written memos, briefings or other written communication, sources have told POLITICO.

I’ve got mixed feelings about this since we Pastafarians are also skeptical about accepted causes of Climate Change. Years ago you’ll remember that we found a statistically significant relationship between the rise in average global temperature and the declining Pirate population.

I’ll note that even after 10 years, this data still has not been dis-proven by the science community, which we interpret as implicit acceptance of it’s Truth.

So we’re sympathetic to Team Trump’s misgivings of Established Science based on “evidence” and “peer-review” and so on.

But, we’re also fans of not needlessly destroying the planet. And while we may not agree with the causes of Climate change, we believe it is happening.

More, we Pastafarians are pragmatic. Even if you have some skepticism about Climate Change (perhaps all that data is being altered by a Supernatural being of some sort) — let’s maybe err on the side of reigning in pollution and old wasteful technologies with their excess CO2 production — and instead let’s support emerging technologies which can provide clean, renewable power. Not to mention jobs.

For this reason, I think Team Trump and the GOP are acting like tools.

Again, I hate to mention politics on our Church site, but I felt that we Pastafarians, as fellow science-skeptics, should say something.

What do you guys think?

160 Responses to “Climate Change is a Touchy Subject”

1 5 6 7
  1. Malthe says:

    On the x-axis: 35000 and 45000 seem to have swapped places.

    • bruceo says:

      Our Lord works in mysterious ways.

  2. Captain Birdseye says:

    Malthe, we use the same methodology as cutting-edge Creation scientists.

  3. Richardrobert says:

    Even with democracy if a gathering wins a majority, at that point they can totally stifle the thoughts of the minority. Imagine a scenario where there were one, or two, Assignment Writer smart thoughts inside the minority. It will rely upon the development of a specific nation or society how these things get took care of. There is a comparable event in climate ideology.

  4. Mr. Hankey says:

    Except that democratic does not mean monistic.

    ‘Qualifications’ obtained by cheating are worthless and dangerous.

    “…get took care of” ?

    Try looking at climatologists’ evidence.


  5. Alexhales says:

    Most of the people do not deny climate exchange. Most of the people well known climate has by no means stopped and in no way will prevent changing. A number of us want to factor out looking to prevent weather exchange is a mistake. The weather is not an air conditioner to set thermostat on. Essay Writing Services

1 5 6 7

Leave a Reply