you have completely pissed us off

Published October 23rd, 2006 by Bobby Henderson

Please do not take any offensive “hate mail” written by Christians as an example of Christianity. We are not very good Christians; we who use words of hate. You must understand, however, that you have completely pissed us off. This site is just stupid. The concept is stupid. I can give you evidence against evolution if you so desire.

I do sort of agree that ID should not be taught in schools, but neither should evolution. It is wrong that evolution, classified as SCIENTIFIC THEORY, is taught as a fact. Teaching evolution in schools is just as offensive to us as teaching ID in schools is to you. We are all people.

The majority of Christians do not want to press our beliefs upon anybody else. The same cannot be said for scientists, it appears. Plus, while Christians want to bring wayward people to God for the wayward people’s sake, scientists want to study and elaborate on evolution because they think they can discover something wonderful and get rich off of it. So, there is still a difference between the two sides.

I think this whole fight is futile. It is written that God’s children will be hated by all, and I can see that’s the way it’s going. Everybody hates Christians…

-Yet Another Christian

540 Responses to “you have completely pissed us off”

1 65 66 67
  1. TheFewTheProudTheMarinara says:

    The original poster said “scientists want to study and elaborate on evolution because they think they can discover something wonderful and get rich off of it. ” Really? I’ll bet you Billy Graham and the majority of televangelists are richer than the average scientist, and they offer no facts at all. If you really want to get rich and famous, come up with proof that god(s) exist. Anyone? Anyone?

  2. the random frog says:

    yes evolution is a theory. like gravity.

    by your logic nothing should be taught at school. as you are only willing to teach facts (ie things that have been proven 100%). it is impossible to prove something 100%, all we as scientist can do is aquire more and more evidence for a theory until it there is enough for it to be considered useful. even then it is not a fact. take newtons laws of motion for example, for hundreds of years these were thought to explain exactly how things moved. but then einstein came along with his theory of relitivity and completely blew it out of the water.

    in conclusion, no, evolution is not a fact and perhaps it shouldn’t be taught as such but then neither is anything else, so as long as the teacher emphasises the fact that nothing should be taken as fact there is no reason not to teach evolution. it has more than enough evidence.

  3. Stephen says:

    I hate the ‘it’s just a theory’ argument, a theory is based on facts

  4. Rational thinker says:

    “Evolution is just a theory”

    Gravity is theory as well-should we not teach Newtonian physics in school then. Tell that to NASA, they believed it enough to send men to the moon and back without even having to believe In a Zombie Jesus who was his own father. Damn logic and evidence is always getting in the way of my faith…crap.

    • Inge says:

      Evolution is NOT just a theory. Everybody who has ever seen the result of a love affair between a Dachshound and a German Shepherd knows about the changes that genetic variation bring on. Dogs themselves (canis lupus familiaris) are the result of genetic selection of – among others – the wolf (canis lupus).
      Through calculation of the time the existing genetic variations must have taken you can have very precise results:
      – That the existing purebred German Shepherds go back to only six individuals, inbred to each other, for example
      – Where the oldest human genpool came from (and it was NOT the mountain of Ararat)
      – How long it must have taken to get today’s bredth of variations (and even considering short-lived forefathers this wasn’t accomplished within 6000 years

      So – not just a theory, a daily confirmed fact.

      • TheFewTheProudTheMarinara says:

        Those who want to doubt macro-evolution should look at the difference between a chihuahua and a timber wolf, and realize it’s happened in only a few thousand years.

  5. TheFewTheProudTheMarinara says:

    I watched a video where some preacher “disproved” evolution because no jars of peanut butter evolved into something else on the shelf. Hell, I’ve never even seen the jars mating, and as a young man I stocked shelves in the supermarket at night, when you’d think they’d be most active.

    • Keith says:

      I know for a fact that wire coathangers breed inside of wardrobes. They don’t interbreed with wooden or plastic ones. Mothballs slow down the breeding process.

      • Atsap Revol says:

        Yes, Keith, wire coat hangers do copulate in wardrobes, or as we Yanks call them, closets. The product of their mating is a larval stage called paperclips, which cluster in desk drawers. To avoid excessive hangers and paperclips underfoot in your house, immediately neuter all wire coat hangers when you bring them home with garments from the cleaners. The wooden and plastic hangers are a whole different story; consult a standard biology text for descriptions of their asexual life cycles.

        • Keith says:

          I was hoping to read up on the wooden and plastic hangers but could not find anything in my local library. I do have an old edition of “The How and Why Wonder Book of Coat Hangers” But it does not mention their reproductive cycle (probably because it was printed for kids). It is very much out of date by now, anyway. It does say that Dinosaurs did not use coathangers but just because they have not found evidence of them in sixty million year old rocks does not mean Dinosaurs did not hang their feathers up to air out.

  6. Alphy says:

    Hey Stupid,

    Evolution is a theory that is overwhelming supported by scientific research. It ought to be taught since the vast body of scientific data wholly supports the theory of evolution. Scientific research and the data obtained from it does not support ID which is a covername for creationism which is religion. It is intellectually and morally dishonest for fundamentalists to pick and choose only those bits and pieces of data that can be seen to support creationism and disregard all other data that does not fit their preordained position and then present this distorted and dishonest crap as science.

    Hey, Yet another christian. Stop feeding children poop in the name of science!

1 65 66 67

Leave a Reply