What does FSM theory, Naturalist

Published September 6th, 2005 by Bobby Henderson

What does FSM theory, Naturalist science, and Intelligent Design all have in common?

You cannot prove ANY of them are truth.

Time has proven Naturalism and Darwinistic beliefs to be flawed, just as others have been. No one has a videotape of the beginning of the universe, and thus we have only theories. Theories are not FACT. They are conjecture based on assumptions.

Yet we embrace Naturalism as though it is fact with the most important fundamental question that could be asked: Where did we come from?

While FSM is effective in proving a point that Intelligent Design introduced into a school setting is highly questionable – I would also like to take it a step further and say it also proves how faulty Naturalist theories can be as well. Science needs to admit ignorance of FACT in this matter and simply say “We don’t know for sure,” and get over itself. After all, if Naturalism was indeed accurate and perfect as a theory…it would be a LAW.

Laws of science are all that need to be taught in the school system, otherwise the school system is pushing fact based on FAITH in a theory.

For all we know a Flying Spaghetti Monster created the universe with noodles.

And, Mr. Henderson, for all you know you may be going to hell.

Aaron Waggoner

5 Responses to “What does FSM theory, Naturalist”

  1. Nikkkolay (formerly tha beast from tha east) says:

    Finally, you get it XD… i took the comment virginity!

  2. Captain Philaaarrrrhhh! says:

    Well, Aaron, you almost got me, up to the “hell” thing. Now please go stuff your buybull up your ass. really. Go ahead, You deserve it…

  3. Joe says:

    Dude, look up “Theory” on wikipedia, you obviously have no idea what the term means. It’s ok that you are ignorant of the meaning, as long as you go to the trouble of educating yourself. But an idiot who wants to remain an idiot is just another asshole.

    (from Wikipedia)”In the sciences, a scientific theory comprises a collection of concepts, including abstractions of observable phenomena expressed as quantifiable properties, together with rules (called scientific laws) that express relationships between observations of such concepts. A scientific theory is constructed to conform to available empirical data about such observations, and is put forth as a principle or body of principles for explaining a class of phenomena.”

    “Observable phenomena expressed as quantifiable properties.” Dude, gravity is only a theory, not a law, so according to your logic you should be able to go to the top of a 10 story building and jump off. I think you should.

  4. Greg says:


    And, I might add, there IS evidence for evolution, unlike creationism which has exactly zero evidence.

    @Aaron Waggoner
    Sorry buddy I think I will stick to stuff that actually has evidence to support it. If you think there is no evidence and creationism and evolution are on an equal footing you only show how ignorant you are.

  5. TheFewTheProudTheMarinara says:

    Also, what the hell does “Darwinism” have to do with the beginning of the universe? A separate issue.

Leave a Reply