It is an interesting argument to state that pasta was not invented until later in Creation as a lack of proof of God.
The problem arises when we discuss issues of faith, that we need to look at archaelogical instances parralleling cultural experiences. It is not suffice to state, "We have no record of it" to determine it does not exist. Lack of proof is not a proof of lack of existence.
As we believe with our faith in FSM (Marinara Be Upon Him)
Historically, daily events and activities, such as eating, laundry, were rarely documented.
Example: There is no record of christians sodomized goats & pigs, however we have evidence there must have been a significant amount of this activity to require their god to determine it was a bad thing. As we all know, christianity is one of those 'made up' religions so it is more likely, based on facts, a church leader or political mucky muck jealous that the sheep he was dating would never call him for a second date.
But I digest.
Common activities not being documented, it is not proof that spaghetti, or any related pasta oriented activities, consumptions or tools of worship did not exist. The documentation that spaghetti was 'created' in a later century could merely be a significant marketing campaign, such as the pet rock, potted velcro plants, and douchebags. Later, or earlier depending on the design of the Architects of Unbelief, the heralds of the this time of the Coming of the Pastas determined to squelch the spread of FSM belief by presenting counter-evidence to the fact that Pasta is too modern to have made a significant impact on our culture, civilization and Divine Creation.
All these things I speak in the word of noodles.
Praise FSM (MBUH)
- Jim, Linguines Witness