Moderator: phpBB2 - Administrators
lordpunkmonk wrote:listen elijah I can't deal with your crap today so if would so kindly leave it would be much appreciated on my part.
Zankou 2.0 wrote:Neither can you, evidently.
elijah wrote:Not so, though I'm sure you endorse the term in order to feel that way.
thelastpirate wrote:elijah wrote: And since when was a person like you, clearly not learned in Flying Spaghetti Monsterism, the decider of what views the organisation has?
That sentence is utterly meaningless.
elijah wrote:thelastpirate wrote:elijah wrote: And since when was a person like you, clearly not learned in Flying Spaghetti Monsterism, the decider of what views the organisation has?
For as long as they have had no time to care what views the Flying Spaghetti Monsterism Organization has.That sentence is utterly meaningless.
When cowardly taken out of context indeed. How about phastasees?
Zankou 2.0 wrote:But you still don't know the difference between and innocent pun and slander.
elijah wrote:thelastpirate wrote:elijah wrote: And since when was a person like you, clearly not learned in Flying Spaghetti Monsterism, the decider of what views the organisation has?
For as long as they have had no time to care what views the Flying Spaghetti Monsterism Organization has.
elijah wrote:Zankou 2.0 wrote:But you still don't know the difference between and innocent pun and slander.
I am no longer ignorant of the difference between an innocent pun and slander. So it is "Not so" that I still don't know the difference. It is true that perhaps because suppositions of my "still not knowing the difference" is "not so." I should have punctuated the proclamation with a period, although such is as insignificant as your writing "and" instead of "an" in terms of the connectivity of the thoughts of my or your "talk" which are more distinguished by their capacities. But it is so that part of the reason you call yourself a pastafarian is attempting to provoking a response that though legitimate you cast as unjustified to use as leverage for support in your hateful agenda. Which is why you would endorse the idea that I did not know the difference between a slander and humor in attempting to further conceal your hatred. And which is why I tried to link their communication illustrating that even ones feelings are subject to their author. But you will likely need to speak more than fluent english to understand my "talk", and your implying my communications are unintelligible on a account of the english language is a xenophobic deflection to continue in your derision.
lordpunkmonk wrote:I do
but not because you are a rastafarian more because you waste my time.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests