Moderator: phpBB2 - Administrators
Zankou 2.0 wrote:The top and bottom ones will tie.
Capellini wrote:Third, how come I'm the only one who likes Sir Talksalot?
Capellini wrote:how come I'm the only one who likes Sir Talksalot?
You could be a deity.....
That is huge. Immortality, power, glory ...
(I truly am not disrespecting you. A Prophet of the CofFSM exalted to divinity - a new chapter..)
Rev. Rowan Redbeard wrote:I have to say that I am honestly upset by this.
I understood the point of the game, and I brought up in the very beginning that I wasn't sure that I liked the idea, given what could happen. But I decided to go ahead with it, and asked people to be kind.
I let people know what names I liked, suggested ones based on those that had been proffered by others with the (apparently mistaken) assumption that it would give a better insight into what I was hoping for to those suggesting names so that they might find more titles that were fun and clever and entertaining without being derogatory or linguistically boring, and stated on multiple occasions that I had no desire to be saddled with a title that I disliked.
Perhaps some people don't care what title they have. If my title stays Prophet of Pastafarianism, or even disappears, that's fine by me. But I had honestly thought that by explaining my views in a polite manner that I would be listened to, and I might avoid being put into the position I now find myself in.
Should I have shouted at the top of my lungs? Should I have berated people for suggesting titles I didn't like?
I chose the higher ground, and I am saddened and angered by the lack of respect I have received for it.
(Cap: Yes, that title was on my list, but only because it was less abhorrent to me than many of the others. It was not "liked" so much as tolerated.)
Users browsing this forum: Archer and 4 guests