Cap'n Tedward wrote:Well, my first wedding is a burningman. So, not a lot of ways to cook playa fish there...
Have fun Cap'n!
Moderator: All Things Mods
Cap'n Tedward wrote:Well, my first wedding is a burningman. So, not a lot of ways to cook playa fish there...
Might be mixing up your religions a bit there, Temp0ral.Temp0ral wrote:I don't suppose Darth is an option though, it is mighty tempting...
General Register Office for Scotland wrote:1. A copy of their religious body's or other belief system's constitution or statement of faith, which should contain the aims and beliefs of the group together with details on the appointment of office bearers.
2. Details of membership, both locally and throughout the United Kingdom if applicable, and how often the local body meets for public worship.
3. A copy of the wording of the proposed marriage ceremony.
4. Their full name and the designation they would use when signing the Marriage Schedule eg Minister, Pastor or Lay Preacher.
5. Letters from two office bearers of the religious body or other belief system supporting their application and testifying to their status within the group.
6. The full names of the couple, the date and place of the marriage.
Roy Hunter wrote:Temp0ral wrote:As you can see from condition number 4, I would need a title, so we need to get this sorted out.

Qwertyuiopasd wrote:Bug wrote:I will refrain from voting since every option is based on a Christian alternative.
That is a good point. Can we perhaps come up with riffs on other religions? Imam comes to mind, but I have no idea how we would pastafarianize that. Also: Rabbi.
Bug wrote:I will refrain from voting since every option is based on a Christian alternative. Cap'n is too close to "Chaplain" for me. And "Hey you" just won't work.
So I'm officially not casting a vote. Let the other parts of the community decide
Edit: Some sort of version of "Flyer" might get my vote
PastorDeGranoDuro wrote:...
I do like Irreverend, even though it borrows off Xtnty it does what the CotFSM does to churches and parodies the word.

pieces o'nine wrote:PastorDeGranoDuro wrote:...
I do like Irreverend, even though it borrows off Xtnty it does what the CotFSM does to churches and parodies the word.
Surely you're not implying that churchianity created all *its* concepts and terminology from thin air?

daftbeaker wrote:pieces o'nine wrote:PastorDeGranoDuro wrote:...
I do like Irreverend, even though it borrows off Xtnty it does what the CotFSM does to churches and parodies the word.
Surely you're not implying that churchianity created all *its* concepts and terminology from thin air?
Don't be silly.
A lot of them came from people tripping off their tits on mushrooms and most of the rest came from committees
pieces o'nine wrote:daftbeaker wrote:pieces o'nine wrote:Surely you're not implying that churchianity created all *its* concepts and terminology from thin air?
Don't be silly.
A lot of them came from people tripping off their tits on mushrooms and most of the rest came from committees
Don't be silly, yerself.
We all know that tits do not interest anyone in a position of making decisions in that body. They were clearly tripping off some other appendage(s).


pieces o'nine wrote:PastorDeGranoDuro wrote:...
I do like Irreverend, even though it borrows off Xtnty it does what the CotFSM does to churches and parodies the word.
Surely you're not implying that churchianity created all *its* concepts and terminology from thin air?

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests