Moderator: All Things Mods
Qwertyuiopasd wrote:I agree that a lot of the stuff here isn't "substantive." We haven't really had a good discussion in quite some time. There used to be much hotter debates when we were younger, trendier, and attracted more people on the opposite side of the debate. Of course, many of those discussion are now in Old Posts or Locked, or have simply been pruned.
We'd all be happy to have real discussions once again. I'm sure I speak for all of us when I invite you to create or revive any topic of discussion in any of the serious sections of the forum.
And as far as enforcement of the actual rules, that rule is in place because we don't want people just posting the same post over and over again, or posting something that says only one word, or is just "I agree" or "I disagree." It's like those questions that ask a question, and then say "Why?" at the end. Don't worry that we're not enforcing our own rules. They really don't come into play much because things are fairly quiet around here; our admin rarely feels the need to show her presence. For the most part it's just us friends hanging out.
In short, I agree with you. Let's have a substantive discussion.
Qwertyuiopasd wrote:/// Maybe that is why we haven't had as much serious discussion as of late?
Cardinal Fang wrote:P.S. I personally wouldn't say "pooface" - I'd go with numpty
MarathonMan wrote:Truth be told, you don't WANT serious discussion.
MarathonMan wrote:Atheists do not engage in debate so much as they call names, and feign intellectual supremacy, arrogance, and unbridled offensiveness.
MarathonMan wrote:Almost everything we have learned has been learned from authority.
MarathonMan wrote:Atheists are really mentally ill. Having no god, they must worship something, and this
inevitably leads to self-worship, pathological narcissism.
Users browsing this forum: Cerberus and 2 guests