by PKMKII on Fri Apr 03, 2009 11:43 pm
Ubi Dubium wrote:PKMKII wrote:.. I'm just pointing out that you can't judge the merits of a religion on the activity of its followers.
Actually, I'd say that the only way to just the
merits of a religion is by the activity of its followers. But I don't think you can judge the
truth of a religion by those activities.
That would be true if religion existed in a vacuum, where there was only a religion and its followers. But we live in a complex world where all sorts of things mix in with religion: politics (domestic and foreign), culture, money, geography, ethnicity. You can't say that the middle east's turn to a fundamentalist Islam is purely because of Islam, and ignore the rise of europe as an economic and cultural center while at the same time, the middle east's reign of cultural dominance was waning.
"How is it that hardly any major religion has looked at science and concluded, 'This is better than we thought! The Universe is much bigger than our prophets said, grander, more subtle, more elegant. God must be even greater than we dreamed'? Instead they say, 'No, no, no! My god is a little god, and I want him to stay that way.'" - Carl Sagan
"To doubt everything or to believe everything are two equally convenient solutions; both dispense with the necessity of reflection." - Henri Poincaré