As a scientist, I’d like to say that the currently accepted scientific theory is evolution. But, some competing ideas have been proposed, such as ID and FSMism, and discussion to include one should include the other, as these ideas are equally valid.
– Mark Zurbuchen, Ph.D.

As a medical practitioner and scientist, I wholeheartedly believe that every theory and hypothesis needs full consideration and explanation with formal ratification by peer review. We have a duty to inform our schools and presumably pasta should form a staple part of our educational diet.
– Dr. A. Macintyre (UK)

Letting the religious right teach ID in schools is like letting the Marines teach poetry in advanced combat training. As a scientist, I see these the relevancy between the two sets to be equal. If Kansas is going to mess up like this, the least it can do is not be hypocritical and allow equal time for other alternative “theories” like FSMism, which is by far the tastier choice.
– J. Simon, PhD

One of the hardest things to do as a scientist is to put my personal beliefs aside when discussing matters of science. So as a professional, I have to say that both forms of Intelligent Design - ID and ID-FSM are equally valid and if intelligent design is taught in schools, equal time should be given to the FSM theory and the non-FSM theory. But, speaking personally now, it seems to me the FSM theory is MUCH more plausable than the non-FSM ID theory, because it is the only one of the two that takes into account all the discrepancies between ID and measureable objective reality.
– Professor Douglas Shaw, Ph.D

In discussing competing theories, if one is to present ID then it is only fair and logical to teach other theories with commensurate evidence. Based on Mr. Henderson’s letter, it is clear that the FSM theory has evidence comparable in weight to ID. As a scientist and professor, it is often difficult to present differing opinions in an unbiased way. However, it is important to the student to be exposed to these ideas to form their own opinions. This comes right out of the handbook of the ID purporters: present the different “theories” and let the listener decide. If those in favor of ID are so convinced, then they should not be concerned that the presentation of the FSM theory would serve to undermine the credibility of ID.
– Elizabeth Garrett-Mayer, PhD

At one time, I believed as the Aztecs did, that the universe was created by two gods, Quetzalcoatl and Tezcatlipoca who attacked and ripped apart Hungry Woman to create the universe. Then I believed, as the Moriori do, that the universe was created when Papa and her husband Rangi hugged and bore children, and were subsequently separated by their son Tane who let light shine between them. However, my views have been swayed by the substantial evidence that the earth and universe was actually created relatively recently by the Flying Spaghetti Monster (FSM). I am firmly convinced that the evidence supporting this depiction of the origins of life, the universe, and everything has many of the trappings of science, and I therefore support the inclusion of FSM creation evidence in the Kansas science curriculum and standards.
– Sebastian Wren, Ph.D

One of the most exciting developments in fundamental physics in the last twenty years has been the development of so-called “String Theory.” In String Theory, all fundamental sub-atomic particles are visualized and described mathematically as microscopic vibrating strings. Although as yet unproven, many physicists believe that String Theory has the potential to become the long-sought “Theory of Everything,” through which the fundamental physical nature of all matter and forces will become understood.

Obviously String Theory IS correct, although misnamed (a secular humanist conspiracy perhaps?). As NOODLE Theory clearly unambiguously reveals, He has created the fundamental subatomic particles that form all matter in this universe in His own quivering image! You, me, the Earth, the stars…everything in the universe…are all built of trillions of tiny jiggling noodles, microscopic copies of our Divine Saucy Maker. Truly He is everywhere and in all things!
Boy-oh-Boyardi and Ramen!
–Steve Lawrence, PhD

As a scientist I believe that when presented with a new idea every possibility should be considered so we can eventually find the truth. It would be very biased if the only possibilities presented would be regulated by some authority. As a scientist I am biased towards the theory of evolution, but this does not mean that everyone should be forced to only learn this and believe this. Putting this aside, I feel if the government feels the need to regulate what students need to learn, then all ideas should be taught in school. Not only Intelligent Design (ID) should be taught, but the theory of the Flying Spaghetti Monster (FSM) should also be taught. In my scientific opinion when comparing the two theories, FSM theory seems to be more valid then the classic ID theory. There is more data to back FSM then I have ever seen for ID. The graph which was presented should alone more convincing then anything ID has ever presented. I endorse the FSM theory.
–Afshin Beheshti, PhD

As a scienctist, I think that ID is a form of pseudoscience–nothing more, nothing less. Pseudosciences lack the well-designed and carefully-interpreted experiments which characterize the true sciences. ID is popular because it provides the general public with an easily understood “answer” to nature’s complexity. Why is it human nature to try to fill the gaps in science with some form of a deity? Nobel laureate Richard Feynman, in his response the Challenger disaster, wrote, “For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled.” It is too bad that many in the USA have fallen into the ID trap, and are making emotional rather than logical decisions.

That being said, and the more I consider ID and the Flying Spaghetti Monster (FSM) theory, the FSM theory has a lot going for it. First, it should satisfy even the most ardent ID detractors. Secondly, since everyone needs to eat and to believe in something, the FSM theory fulfills these desires. Finally, FSM neatly ties together the many ideas about the creation of the universe. I plan on exposing my students to the FSM theory over a pasta dinner.
–Elizabeth Cowles, PhD

Continue to Academic Endorsements - page 2

724 Responses to “Academic Endorsements - page 1”


Pages: « 129 30 31 32 33 [34] 35 36 37 » Show All

  1. 661 falorethefalore Mar 22nd, 2008 at 5:03 am

    Yates, evolution is not a process towards greater complexity and intricacy. That’s quite backwards and makes it sound like evolution works to change organisms to higher forms. That belief is along the lines of ID; evolution has no goal in mind. In the process, gradual changes are made that merely increase overall fitness. This will depend on the surrounding environment and often even results in the loss of previously acquired specialized traits or complexity. For example, a large complex beak for cracking a large nut will only be cumbersome in the absence of that food source. Likewise, if smart Americans go to college, but 75% of college students are killed each year by meningitis, Americans will “evolve” to be stupider.
    I’m advising my hyperchristian pre-med friends to look into population ecology to ease them into evolution

  2. 662 Lee Mar 25th, 2008 at 11:28 am

    Historical Perspective
    To quote the History of Pasta, “unlike other ubiquitous Italian foods like Pizza and tomato sauce, which have a fairly recent history pasta may indeed have a much older pedigree going back hundreds if not thousands of years.”
    “Like so much of southern Italian life, the Arab invasions of the 8th century heavily influenced the regional cuisine and is the most accepted theory for the introduction of pasta. The dried noodle-like product they introduced to Sicily is most likely the origins of dried pasta and was being produced in great quantities in Palermo at this time.”
    It is evident that Pastafarianism is common to all the Judeo-Christian religions and curiously finds itself closely tied to Islam.
    Read more about the early origins of Pastafrianism in Ezekiel 4:9.

    Where is the FSM today?
    More up to date proof of his noodly grace apon us can be found at http://www.local6.com/news/7882549/detail.html. This story details the story of a man in California who claims the image of Jesus appeared to him while he was eating a plate of manicotti at an Italian restaurant.

    The evidence is mounting.

  3. 663 Laura Mar 26th, 2008 at 1:30 pm

    hi. just wanted to let you know that i think you might be my soul mate.

  4. 664 Ashley Mar 27th, 2008 at 9:07 pm

    So we have been using your religion as an example in our philosophy class. Basically to say that we have no real proof of God, so who is to say that there is not flying spaghetti monster. Honestly dude, I love it! And I believe in God, I go to church, I’m a youth group leader. But way to go for you. Don’t listen to those haters. They are trying to push their God loving selves on you and yet get offended when they hear of your ideas. Hell, then stay off the damn website! Everyone believes in what they believe in and I LOVE THIS SITE! Good job!

  5. 665 Eric O Tooley Mar 29th, 2008 at 2:12 am

    Arr

  6. 666 Mattrocks! Mar 29th, 2008 at 9:06 am

    HATE THE FS.3+M02.
    94.
    5.2306+
    02+01360216

  7. 667 ahora Mar 31st, 2008 at 4:10 pm

    Obviously, the mockery and sarcasm is the best result that could give the weak minds.

  8. 668 Francesc Apr 1st, 2008 at 6:44 am

    @ahora
    “Obviously, the mockery and sarcasm is the best result that could give the weak minds.”

    Are you sure? Sarcasm is what differences us from animals, and fundies, it’s a sign of intelligence :-)

  9. 669 lance Apr 3rd, 2008 at 6:44 am

    All hail the FSM. I had a thought that came to mind and didn’t know where else to leave a reply so here it is. All males were givien one noodle…i think we all know what that noodle is and does but perhaps the FSM did give us one thing to be like him so he couldn’t not truly be forggotten by anyone as he is invisiable. And all females were given a place where they are able to intercept that noodle and make make a baby who for some reason is attached to a noodle so he can live. conisidence…i think not

  10. 670 Ian Burrow Apr 7th, 2008 at 1:19 pm

    Why is it that so many of these claimed followers of the Person who told them, in no uncertain terms, to love their enemies, regard everyone as their neighbor, follow the Golden Rule, and to be servants to all, are so consumed with this obscene, violent and gleeful hatred? And why are so many of them also functionally illiterate: those great religious schools they attended, perhaps?

    Almost makes me ashamed to be a Christian. Go FSM! Laughter is the best tool against the unreason of these American Taliban.

  11. 671 Mitch Apr 9th, 2008 at 12:41 am

    This is the best religion i have ever come across. Nothing even comes close to this great religion, it is also(and quite sadly) the most believable religion ever.

  12. 672 Debbie Apr 10th, 2008 at 5:45 pm

    I love this religion! It so speaks to me and I dont even have a PHD…I just get it…Thanks for
    the site and all the work to maintain it….Signed a Humanist in Canada Peace!

  13. 673 Arj Apr 10th, 2008 at 6:03 pm

    From the Book of Gnocci Verses 2 and three chapter 1
    And he said let there be light!
    And light oozed capriciously like liquified durham wheat into the world .
    And he reached forth his noodley appendage and made the earth.
    And he deemed it good and wholesome!

    Had he wanted evangelical foolishness and skulduggery, he would have made Tammy Baker himself rather than allowing ‘Bob the Lord of Darkness’ to do it himself ; (during a hangover with shabby materials with one had tied behind his backs).

  14. 674 Richie Apr 13th, 2008 at 12:01 am

    In response to falorethefalore:

    Your clarification on the differences between progression and precession(sp) notwithstanding, your arguement could be construed as flawed, as it assumes that all students who die of meningitis are intellegent, given only the stupid remain after 25%. One would assume all the intellegent freshman would attend any informational session on the subject, unless they just had better things to do. With that in mind, if 75% of college students die of meningitis, then the evolution therein would be based upon an outgoing gene pool. One could then stipulate that these are the practices of the flighty, and not of any well-rounded individuals. Then again, one must question the sedentary well-informed students. While they may not be able to gather the strength to schlep the thirty feet down the hall or at the very least pick up a flyer from their RA, they take solace in the fact they can easily research both causes and preventitive measures for meningitis online. Then, returning to the 25% remaining, one can only confirm these few, these happy few, have gathered intellegence on the matter. Okay, I totally lost my train of thought, but instead of re-reading anything I’ll just keep trucking…
    Meningitis! So I disagree evolution would result in a stupider gene pool. That has been established, as has the evidence that a desire to learn would at the very least produce curious offspring. Whether they could effectively apply this curiosity is unclear. But consider this: meningitis would more likely affect those who come into contact with others more directly and often. Therefore those poor bastards who thought it would show initiative to attend the meningitis awareness meeting/”Fall BaK in2 Lerning” risk their own lives. Therefore, if we can agree that certain people who venture out to prevent meningitis contract it by this very mean, we could then say that the more curious are unfit, but if they had thought it out, they would stay in their room to avoid such a terrible (albeit perfect) example of irony. Any lack of outside stimuli is already understood, as are any results of such or lack thereof.
    Now, those who remain in their room and research the matter alone: do they do this to avoid contamination, avoid human contact, or merely because they feel their own wealth of knowledge makes such ventures unneccessary? Or is the answer a combination? Do they rationalize their own insecurities and social shortcomings with a intellegent delusion of granduer? Do they express fear of getting too close to viruses when what they truly fear is closeness of the heart? Or do they hide such fears of microscopic agents with a grandiose display of confidence, as if knowing what it is alone would render it powerless? The only known can be they would overthink the hell out of it, as all that time alone makes them more likely to consider all options.
    If 75% of students die from meningitis, any resulting offspring would be intellegent enough to look for answers, but not really inclined to do anything about it. Stupidity would not be the most accurate word. I say that they would be the children of cowards, but they would know exactly how and why their predecessors were cowards, and how they themselves could avoid such pitfalls. But having been the inbred result of self-fearings, they won’t act on what they’ve learned. Stupidity in a sense, but far more dire.

    I like alfredo sauce on my spaghetti. It makes me feel classy and full.

  15. 675 Richie Apr 13th, 2008 at 12:03 am

    Upon reviewing my entry I have noticed I mispelled intelligence several times, recognized the irony, and have loved it all the more because of it.

  16. 676 Yann Apr 15th, 2008 at 7:58 pm

    “Obviously, the mockery and sarcasm is the best result that could give the weak minds.”

    Mockery and sarcasm is the best result that could *deserve* the weak minds.

  17. 677 FSM convert, Mr.PT Apr 18th, 2008 at 1:04 pm

    This site is fantastic! having discovered it in a geology lesson instead of learning about rocks, i am a newly converted Pastafarian and i will be buying the FSM gospel. Keep up the good work guys and ill be looking into the pirate-global warming theory in more detail myself

  18. 678 BlackBard Apr 18th, 2008 at 6:50 pm

    Mr.PT,
    .
    Welcome to the bowl. May you be touched by His Noodly Appendage and warmed in His Sauce.
    .
    RAmen

  19. 679 Dr. Stan Taylor Apr 20th, 2008 at 11:54 am

    I have used the Gospel with much success at my “Date Night With Jesus” Friday evening study group for young ladies. It has shown good value as both an instructional tool and discipline device.

  1. 680 jack black Trackback on Apr 2nd, 2008 at 12:38 pm

Pages: « 129 30 31 32 33 [34] 35 36 37 » Show All

Leave a Reply

Connect with other Pastafarians

Recent Comments

Propaganda Buttons

Add these buttons to your site:



Contribute

The Church of the FSM is looking for content. Details here

Support the Cause

The Church is funded entirely by your purchases of FSM merchandise. Thank you for your support.

Purchase the Gospel

An elaborate spoof on Intelligent Design, The Gospel of the Flying Spaghetti Monster is neither too elaborate nor too spoofy to succeed in nailing the fallacies of ID. It's even wackier than Jonathan Swift's suggestion that the Irish eat their children as a way to keep them from being a burden, and it may offend just as many people, but Henderson, described elsewhere as a 25-year-old "out-of-work physics major," puts satire to the same serious use that Swift did. Oh, yes, it is very funny. -- Scientific American

Misc.

Bobby's Personal Blog

Contact Bobby: Contact Me


Website monitor by Killerwebstats.com

 

Support the Arts:

Fine art taco photography



Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 License. This means you're free to use the content but not sell it. More Details