Last updated 7/2008

Q: Who are you?

A: My name is Bobby Henderson. I’m 27. I grew up in Oregon and move around a lot. I have a physics degree and have successfully avoided a “real” job for years.

Q: Did you really send the Open Letter to the Kansas School Board?

A: Yes. But, I received no replies until after I posted the website online and the School Board started getting lots of emails about it. You can read some of the responses I received here.

Q: Are you an atheist / heathen / what?

A: I don’t have a problem with religion. What I have a problem with is religion posing as science. Teach Creationism in school, fine, but don’t teach it in a science classroom. And don’t change the definition of science so that you can teach these things. That’s retarded.
Supernatural explanations are by definition not science, so why would you teach them in a science classroom?

Religion, itself, isn’t bad. But it isn’t necessarily good, either. There are plenty of good Christians (and Muslims, and Buddhists, and Hindus), and plenty of bad ones.

Dogma is bad for everyone.

Q: You are making God angry.

A: I doubt it. If there’s a God, and he’s intelligent, then I would guess he has a sense of humor. And how do you know He is NOT a Flying Spaghetti Monster?

Q: Do you make money off this?

A: Yes. The Church makes money off T-shirts, car emblems, book sales, and occasionally donations. We are saving a lot of money and pretty soon here we’ll buy our first Pirate Ship which will serve as a floating church, open to all Believers.

Q: Your graph is messed up.

A: No, it’s not. The X-axis doesn’t have to represent time. And the data points don’t need to be in order. A graph is just a collection of data points, I can display them however I want. It might not be what you’re used to, but it’s not messed up. Please stop writing me emails about it (well over 200 at this point).

Q: There are more pirates now than ever. Look at the South Pacific. And song-downloading pirates, and blah blah blah.

A: Real pirates use swords (cutlasses, actually). Those “pirates” in the south pacific are guys with machine guns, cruising around in power-boats. They’re not pirates. And the song-downloading “pirates” are smelly nerds, and therefore not real pirates.

Q: Your grammar/spelling/etc is bad.

A: Yah.

Q: You’re wrong. It’s actually a linguini / mashed potato / dinosaur / elephant / whatever monster.

A: Maybe He just disguises Himself as those things. Also, you’re not funny.

Q: Can I reprint your letter?

A: Yes. Send me a link, please.

Q: Acceptible use of content?

A: It’s ok with me if you’re using the FSM images/content as long as it’s not for profit, and you’re doing it to further the Cause of the church. I.e. printing out FSM propaganda materials and distributing them is ok (and encouraged). Making FSM t-shirts, selling FSM merchandise, etc. is NOT OK.

Q: What blogging/cms software are you using?

A: The recently redesigned site is built on the Wordpress platform with the K2 template.

Q: How many members are there?

A: I don’t know. There are no membership records as such, so I can only guess based on the amount of traffic the site receives, etc. Traffic to date (September 2006) is somewhere in the vicinity of 350 million hits, and around 15 million unique visitors. Google returns close to 2 million results for the phrase “flying spaghetti monster“. So, who knows - your guess is as good as mine.

Q: Why Pirates?

A: We believe that humans evolved from pirates. Consider that humans share around 95% DNA with monkeys, and more than 99.9% DNA with pirates.

Q: Interview requests

A: I’m happy to answer your questions. I recommend you just send me your questions in an email with a subject that I’ll notice, like “INTERVIEW QUESTIONS”. You don’t need to ask permission or set up an interview for some future time, just send me the questions. Thanks.

Q: Website statistics

A: Somewhere around 10k-40k visitors per day, and somewhere around 500k-1million hits a day. Hits are extremely high because lots of people hotlink images,etc from the site. Which is fine w/me.

Emails - depends, but 50 per day is not uncommon. I have 13,839 unread emails right now (9/25/06). I’ll get to as many as I can.

Q: Why is there an FSM banner on my MySpace profile?

A: It’s a virus/worm that WAS NOT CREATED BY ME. I had nothing to do with it. I’m sorry - it caused everyone a lot of problems, and I do not approve of this sort of thing. You can remove it by following the directions here.

More questions? Ask me below, or email me at bobby.henderson@gmail.com

725 Responses to “Frequently Asked Questions”

Pages: « 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 937 » Show All
  1. 61 - October 3rd, 2006 at 4:56 pm - A skeptic Says:

    Dear nzlemming,

    Paul claimed to have met Jesus after the ressurection - that’s the eyewitness testimony I was referring to. As you say, we only have his word for it, but that’s a common characteristic of eyewitness testimony. It doesn’t mean that you can’t trust an eyewitness.
    I have bought cars in the past. It was a risk, and my judgment about the sincerity of the salesman was a factor in my decision to take that risk.
    You seem to think that I’m advocating you should believe anyone who sounds sincere. I’m not. I’m saying that a judgment about their sincerity is a factor in deciding whether to believe them.
    As to whether logic would have any impact on me - I believe that it would. Is it so illogical to trust another human being?

  2. 62 - October 3rd, 2006 at 5:18 pm - Christian Says:

    Oops, mixed up my pseudonyms.

  3. 63 - October 3rd, 2006 at 6:46 pm - Ryan Mear Says:

    Okay, does anyone, I mean anyone see that the ‘christian’s’ argument is ALWAYS the same? ‘Well, I can only say that this is what I choose to believe, or what I think might have most probably likely happened when these things were or weren’t recorded based on some random writer’s testimony that has no definite….blahblahblahblah’ I’m paraphrasing, surely, but you get my point. Oh, by the way (no, not ‘by jesus’) I like the Flying Spaghetti Monster religion better…so I choose to believe that one over christianity…so far there haven’t been any brutal or life stealing wars based on their beliefs, or slavery for that matter. What is it, ‘may he noodly appendage touch you’? BWAHAHAHAHAHA!!! Mear

  4. 64 - October 3rd, 2006 at 7:20 pm - Christian Says:

    Dear Ryan Mear,
    I do choose to believe, but that choice wasn’t made without some evidence. I also believe what I think most probably happened. Is that wrong?
    I’m used to hearing people say that Christians aren’t interested in evidence. It doesn’t offend me, but it would be nice if people acknowledged that eyewitness testimony counts as evidence. I wouldn’t have thought that was controversial, in fact.

  5. 65 - October 3rd, 2006 at 10:09 pm - Christian Says:

    Is it such a strange thing that I’m saying here? We all regularly make decisions about who to trust and who not to trust. And we typically have only limited evidence to guide us in making those decisions. The evidence may influence our decisions, but there’s still a risk, a choice. If that’s irrational, then we’re all irrational.

  6. 66 - October 4th, 2006 at 2:54 am - jimmy Says:

    I’m just curious,is FSM an actual religion.sorry but i thought it was just a joke.maybe thats what i get for doing something i’m not used to doing.

  7. 67 - October 4th, 2006 at 3:12 am - djjack Says:

    Jimmy, it all depends on how you define religion. The American Heritage Dictionary defines religion as: re·li·gion (r-ljn) n.
    1. Belief in and reverence for a supernatural power or powers regarded as creator and governor of the universe.
    2. A personal or institutionalized system grounded in such belief and worship.
    3. The life or condition of a person in a religious order.
    4. A set of beliefs, values, and practices based on the teachings of a spiritual leader.
    5. A cause, principle, or activity pursued with zeal or conscientious devotion.

    I suppose by this definition, yes, it is a real religion. That is exactly the point of the Church of the FSM. It doesn’t matter that others find it difficult to believe. All that matters is what we believe.

    As an aside, I really like the pronounciation key for religion: r-ljn. Maybe I’ll put it on my license plate when I have to register my car next time. Although, people might think I’m a religious crackpot.

  8. 68 - October 4th, 2006 at 3:27 pm - A christian Says:

    It’s claimed on this site that the evidence for Christianity is no better than the evidence for Pastafarianism. But does that claim stand up to a comparison of the evidence for each? The early Christians could point to two facts that their contemporaries could not deny, and could check for themselves. One was that Jesus had been publically executed. Another was that the tomb where his body had been placed was empty. Does Pastafarianism have any evidence comparable to this?

  9. 69 - October 4th, 2006 at 4:39 pm - gill Says:

    You’re mostly missing the point, as this website (and religion) was created to prove how UNprovable any religion was. You can’t take religion A and prove that it’s realer then religion B because you can’t prove that a faith is right or wrong. (hence the word ‘faith’)

  10. 70 - October 4th, 2006 at 6:36 pm - mesy4567 Says:

    I’m confused where can i find the teachings?? i have know clue what the teachings of this religion are.

  11. 71 - October 4th, 2006 at 8:07 pm - shoelace_analysis Says:

    This is all very amusing.

    I am sure that you and I have all been smiled upon and touched by His noodley appendage for realizing that it really doesn’t matter what shape or form He takes, His teachings are still the same.

  12. 72 - October 4th, 2006 at 9:05 pm - Christian Says:

    Dear gill,

    I don’t think I am missing the point. I agree that you can’t prove any religion. But I dispute the claim that faith is formed in the absence of evidence. I also dispute the claim that the evidence for Christianity is no better than the evidence for Pastafarianism. I don’t see how such claims can be substantiated without actually examining the evidence. Let’s get the evidence on the table, and then decide whether the evidence for one is better than the evidence for the other.

  13. 73 - October 5th, 2006 at 12:55 am - Stevee Says:

    Right you go first wheres your evidence for God, remember no anecdotal or written anecdotal evidence is allowed.

    Off you go.

  14. 74 - October 5th, 2006 at 11:13 am - Moritz Says:

    Hi,

    is there a directory of european FSM communities? I’d really like to organize a pastafari somwhere at a university or something, but not alone…

    Moritz

  15. 75 - October 5th, 2006 at 4:27 pm - Christian Says:

    I don’t know if anyone’s been following my posts, but if you have I’ve started discussing these issues under the Richard Dawkins post.
    Cheers

  16. 76 - October 5th, 2006 at 4:36 pm - moochie Says:

    I think it will help us all find inner peace and common understanding if we share a silent prayer. Jray .. try to read this without moving your lips. I’ve added notes so it’s all proper and intellectual and not just made up or nuffin’ and actually the word of the FSM himself. Possibly.

    Our Noodleness, who art in Heavenly sauce
    Harrow is in Essex (0)
    Thy Kingdom come (1)
    You will be done (2)
    And served on earthenware or bone china.
    Give us this day our daily breadstick (3)
    Forgive us our trespasses (4)
    As we keel-haul those who trespass against us (5)
    Lead us not into temptation (6)
    But deliver us from vile (7)
    For thine is the wine
    The beer and the grubby (8)
    For ever and ever (9)
    Etc

    (0) empirically irrefutable. One-Nil to the Pastafarians.
    (1) pretty soon, actually, if all the other religions keeping flinging rockets at each other
    (2) after 7 minutes, regular gas, slightly al dente
    (3) ooo .. have you got any olives? But not those ones with the bit of red stuff in the middle .. yech!
    (4) hang on .. we’re pirates .. we’re supposed to trespass
    (5) Yarrrr!
    (6) oh, go on then!
    (7) sic
    (8) strippers!! Yay!
    (9) except Holy Fridays, Duvet Days, and early closing on Wednesday for staff training

    That’s better. I was worried that all the chat and no worship was going to bring down wrath and smiting and whatnot. Truly we have been blessed. Ok .. back to testifying the crap out of each other.

  17. 77 - October 5th, 2006 at 5:53 pm - SqrlWthANife Says:

    ” he seems sincere. And that’s something I can’t say about Pastafarians; they most certainly do not seem sincere.”

    Why should we be sincere to others not sincere to us? You follow examples set not reset set examples. It’s just how things work, it’s like the whole basis of why “Treat others how you want to be treated” doesn’t work, Your cruel to someone else there either to apathetic to care or are cruel back. I am a very sincere person if you get to know me, but if the jack ass uneducated “Christians” are going to send hate mail about something that can be just as well true if not more true then there supposed god then why should I be nice and sincere about it? Just think about that. RAmen.

  18. 78 - October 5th, 2006 at 6:28 pm - gill Says:

    @ Christian–So, out of curiosity….what evidence do you have, anyways? (The bible doesn’t count, as that’d just start off a whole ‘nother debate over whether the bible was correct or not.)

  19. 79 - October 6th, 2006 at 11:24 pm - Christian Says:

    Dear gill,
    The Bible is the main evidence for Christianity, or at any rate it’s the main evidence that has influenced my Christian beliefs. I don’t mind if that starts another debate. There are two passages that have been particularly influential on me: Gal 1:11-24 and 1 Cor 15:3-8. Both of these contain first-hand eyewitness testimony by St. Paul, and in them he claims to have personally met the resurrected Jesus and received his gospel and commision directly from him. If Paul is not telling the truth, he’s either lying or delusional. I don’t find either of the latter two explanations plausible, given judgments I’ve made about his integrity, intelligence and sanity. The 1 Cor passage also contains a list of the other eyewitnesses to the resurrection, most of whom were still alive at the time he was writing, and thus able to be consulted for confirmation.
    .
    There is also some evidence from non-Christian sources that corroborates some details of the gospels. I’ve given one example under the Richard Dawkin’s post. Then there’s the empty tomb, which indicates that Jesus either rose from the dead or else the disciples stole and concealed his body. Again the latter explanation is inconsistent with judgments I’ve made about their characters. There’s the fact that James - the brother of Jesus - was one of the early Christian leaders in Jerusalem. This fact is corroborated by non-Christian sources. How does a man become convinced that his brother is the Son of God? Again I don’t find it plausible that James was lying. There’s the fact that so many of the early Christians were willing to die for their beliefs in Nero’s purge in AD 64. People today are willing to die for their faith, but usually with whole societies and 1000’s of years of history lending strength to their convictions. These were first generation Christians. What gave them such strong convictions?
    .
    Finally, there are some other reasons that have influenced me to believe in God, though not necessarily the Christian God. But what I’ve already said is more than enough to start half a dozen discussions, so I’ll stop here.

  20. 80 - October 7th, 2006 at 9:38 am - nyx Says:

    “If Paul is not telling the truth, he’s either lying or delusional. I don’t find either of the latter two explanations plausible, given judgments I’ve made about his integrity, intelligence and sanity.”
    .
    Oh? And how did you make those judgements? Did you know Paul personally?

Pages: « 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 937 » Show All

Leave a Reply

Connect with other Pastafarians


Join the FSM Facebook group - over 35k members ...

Propaganda Buttons

Add these buttons to your site:



Contribute

The Church of the FSM is looking for content. Details here

Support the Cause

The Church is funded entirely by your purchases of FSM merchandise. Thank you for your support.

Purchase the Gospel

An elaborate spoof on Intelligent Design, The Gospel of the Flying Spaghetti Monster is neither too elaborate nor too spoofy to succeed in nailing the fallacies of ID. It's even wackier than Jonathan Swift's suggestion that the Irish eat their children as a way to keep them from being a burden, and it may offend just as many people, but Henderson, described elsewhere as a 25-year-old "out-of-work physics major," puts satire to the same serious use that Swift did. Oh, yes, it is very funny. -- Scientific American

Misc.

Bobby's Personal Blog

Contact Bobby: Contact Me


Website monitor by Killerwebstats.com

 

Support the Arts:

Fine art taco photography


Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 License. This means you're free to use the content but not sell it. More Details