Comments on: Academic Endorsements – page 4

By: Whitney Barbara

Whitney Barbara — Tue, 14 Jun 2011 09:40:40 +0000

I like the valuable information you provide in your articles. I will bookmark your weblog and check again here regularly. I am quite sure I’ll learn a lot of new stuff right here! Best of luck for the next!

By: dofollow list social bookmarking

dofollow list social bookmarking — Sun, 27 Mar 2011 21:24:44 +0000

There are a lot of strange comments on here.

By: Vannessa Lamberson

Vannessa Lamberson — Sun, 27 Mar 2011 19:16:00 +0000

I¡¦m now not certain where you’re getting your information, but good topic. I must spend a while finding out much more or working out more. Thanks for excellent information I was looking for this info for my mission.

By: harmony 880

harmony 880 — Sun, 27 Mar 2011 14:42:01 +0000

I have been able to work with weights now that I am in high school, and I want to learn which vitamins and minerals to take. I want to take only natural things and FORGET anything like steriods. No way am I gonna mess myself up. Anybody have any advice?

By: wpolscemamymocneseo

wpolscemamymocneseo — Sun, 27 Mar 2011 04:54:52 +0000

Dude, you should be a writer. Your text is really interesting. You ought to do it for a living

By: Linda Mivshek

Linda Mivshek — Sat, 26 Mar 2011 22:11:56 +0000

I couldn’t have asked for a better blog. You happen to be there to give excellent information, going right to the point for easy understanding of your website visitors. You’re undeniably a terrific expert in this arena. Thank you for always being there visitors like me.

By: muhteşem yüzyıl dizisi

muhteşem yüzyıl dizisi — Mon, 03 Jan 2011 21:19:12 +0000

muhteşem yüzyıl dizisi, muhteşem yüzyıl dizisi izle , muhteşem yüzyıl dizisi hobaa thanks

By: Dov Henis

Dov Henis — Tue, 04 May 2010 15:35:44 +0000

Embarrassingly obvious TOE, expanding the horizon beyond Darwin And Einstein.
It is spacedistance, NOT spacetime, that does it:

Theory Of Everything Without Strings Attached.
Embarrassingly Obvious And Simple.
See the signature links.

Life’s Genesis Was Not Cells But First Gene’s Self Reproduction.
Life Is Just Another Mass Format.

Since July 5 1997 I have developed and been proposing the following scenario of life’s genesis:

* Life’s genesis was not cell(s), but the self reproduction of yet uncelled ungenomed gene(s).

* There was NOT any “Pre-History Of Life” evolving in an archaic pre-modern life cell.

* Cells were definitely NOT life’s genesis. Cells were products of evolution of Earth’s primal organisms, of Earth’s first stratum organisms, the RNA genes that have always been and still are running the show of life, the energy-storing biosphere survival, since Earth life’s day one.

* A gene’s self reproduction was distinctly an evolutionary, enhanced energy constraint event, above the earlier, random, radiated-energy-induced genes formations.

* Every evolutionary step is inherently an event of an enhanced energy constraint.

* Genomes, RNA and DNA, are functional organs evolved by the primary RNA genes. Cell membranes are also functional organs evolved by the primary RNA gene.

* Life is but one of the many many mass formats in the universe, and its evolution is driven as the evolution of all cosmic mass formats, to gain temporary enhanced energy constraint, i.e. to survive as long as possible.

Dov Henis
(Comments From The 22nd Century)
03.2010 Updated Life Manifest
http://www.the-scientist.com/community/posts/list/54.page#5065
Cosmic Evolution Simplified
http://www.the-scientist.com/community/posts/list/240/122.page#4427
Gravity Is The Monotheism Of The Cosmos
http://www.the-scientist.com/community/posts/list/260/122.page#4887

PS:
This Theory Of Everything, with definition of evolution, covers also ALL aspects of anthropology. DH
=============

TOE: Religion Or Science?
(Fwd from the-scientist.com:)

[quote=BobTS1162939] This is the Theory Of Everything In A Nutshell (TOEIANS):

Basic construction of the universe: 1. Particles 2. Strings 3. Frames.

Etc., ….

.[/quote]

II. My comment

A) Since Life is, by our sensory conception, a virtual reality affair, religion is a legitimate virtual reality tool for going through life. But I am not religious. My senses do not become affected by the above TOEIANS. I embarassingly admit that hard as I try I am unable to comprehend the above TOEIANS.

B) My own conception of TOE is scientific, not religious, based strictly on data recorded and observed, of ubiquitous cosmic phenomena. And in presenting my TOE conception I do not deal with mechanisms but with the base processes.

Dov Henis
(Comments From The 22nd Century)

By: Small

Small — Sun, 07 Mar 2010 02:17:05 +0000

I am the most educated 12 year old you’ll never meet, and I can right away say this is true. In works of Terry Pratchett’s, he describes the Discworld as a pizza. As this is an alternate world to Discworld, it dictates a alternate food such as …a meatball. We know the world is created in the creator’s image, dictating the only creator being the FSM.

By: jiohm

jiohm — Mon, 14 Sep 2009 22:32:44 +0000

woah I didn’t beleive at first now I am a true follower

By: sam mastroianni

sam mastroianni — Sun, 23 Aug 2009 22:54:49 +0000

christians, muslims, jews, and others sects of religion have all been at war with each other over idealogy and belief in a god who you cant even see. If the FSM theory is accepted into the curiculum then a generation of children can grow up with belief in somthing you can actualy see and that has caused no war.

praise his noodly appendage
ramen

By: Garrick McElroy

Garrick McElroy — Fri, 10 Jul 2009 13:28:27 +0000

@Daniel #158

Well, there is a fifth force under concideration, and with good reason. Dark Energy, the force that grows stronger the farther two things are from each other. It’s very interesting. I’m not saying you’re wrong on any other points, just saying that there may be 5 types of energies soon!
Yays!