1073760 Views
564 Comments

This is a real religion?

Published March 13th, 2011 by Bobby Henderson

The government actually passed this BS as religion? You just did this so you can get tax cuts, your religion is based on christian hate because thats all i see you mocking on here, You might as well side with the church of satan who mocks their own belief, Just because youre too blind to be enlightened you have decided to scam all the atheists out there, in a way i have to side with you, because all of your followers are just as stupid as you are, nobody ever looks into history, philosophy or multiple religions before basing their faith, they always just side with hate and disbelief, when love is just the true meaning behind every religion, and science is formulated from the start of religion, it seems that your church and your followers will all go down the same stupid path, even if you are a teacher or a doctor you probably are a bad one at that, well except the church leader who is rolling in money from his t-shirts and probably initiation fees and getting tax cuts, what a smart way to scam atheist church goers, you might as well start the next jonestown massacre.

–Nick



564 Responses to “This is a real religion?”

1 18 19 20 21 22 29
  1. nun ya biz says:

    foodfights. these would b better options (justified if there was not starvation in the world)…2nd referrence 2 animal house. the 1st, was the referrence 2 pirates & desire for parade float…

    do u suppose if john belushi were still around he would want 2 c people drinking themselves in2 a stupor? I kno i m a party pooper. 4 that i m sorry.

  2. nun ya biz says:

    OTHER. not oather.

  3. nun ya biz says:

    & o, i have not just been teased online, but off- have had people respond 2 things PRIVATELY written & illegally accessed via channels i havent the skill level 2 explain…but has gone on. Conversations baited, head games played. So, u r in good company.

  4. nun sequitor says:

    Based upon ur observations, i hav altered my pseudo-name permanently…this should more appropos reflect content.

    • TiltedHorizon says:

      Nun, mind if I call you Nun? The name change is certainly more fitting of your posts but does it need to be? Obviously you have something to say but without a proper narrative it becomes cumbersome to sift through. The whole point to posting in a public discussion forum is to participate in existing topics or to inspire new dialog through a related segue.

      I invite you to raise the bar, I know you stated elsewhere about being in physical pain, I assume this limits your ability to type thus explaining the need for shorthand. Here is the trouble with your assertion though, you have contributed more posts in the last few days than I have contributed in the past several weeks. If you put more effort into what you chose to say you would actually be able to type less AND likely make your points clearer.

      Engage us, draw us in, and you will likely find camaraderie or a sympathetic ear but the path you are on is essentially a one-sided conversation better suited to be held with house-pets, not humans. Don’t just write, be heard.

      • nun sequitur says:

        Tilted says: ‘it becomes cumbersome 2 sift thru’

        so, i have MADE my point. WELCOME 2 my world…& thanks 4 making the POINT 4 me, because it IS alot 2 sift thru, its MORE cumbersome 2 LIVE it. @ least u r NOT OBLIGATED 2 do so.

        When ive broken various points down, have been flicked aside as if with the flick of a finger 2 b made ineffective & so, HERE i am, ,,the fly in the soup with insurmountable struggles- by design more so & THIS HAPPENS 2 PEOPLE. the fly gets eaten, drowns, boils or very rarely gets set free but not unscathed…

        I was asked if i ‘believe in conspiracies’…if one is being conspired AGAINST that is THE DICTIONARY DEFINITION, yet so often meant 2 imply delusion on recips part…

        @ the hospital i submitted a pointed legit request 2 know if ‘patient quality care’ & ‘excellence’ in service r there 2 defend actions of neglect by staff of hospital often under blanket policies, or, r they actually INTERESTED in helping patients…is this just a rung on liability ladder or what, am i a liability as i am told or a freaking person?the reply; OH…ive been trying 2 REACH u…the GRAMMAR u used & ur SENTENCE structure could use some adjusting…

        DID u hear me, i said the dr lied about me & implied false things then UNDERTREATED my pain by merely NOT properly instructing me on meds i already HAD …i was not even expecting the dispensing ofcANYTHING but advice and he couldve contacted my DR.

        IGNORED…oh honey that SENTENCE structure…needs WORK…

        • nun sequitur says:

          & what u CALL me is irrelevant @ this point…

        • nun sequitur says:

          Or really relevant depending which way u intend to later break it down & take it out of context after the fact, which would put u in great company…probably calling me pointless would b more appropo.

  5. nun sequitUr says:

    oops.

  6. nun sequitur says:

    1 pt i was trying 2 make was, 4 example, that be, hind every religious extremist ACT, is a person, an individual, following a religion…& surrounding & within THAT, all of the attitudes of members of a group as a collective whole, that persons experiences, in & outside of that…so if u r going against type, have 2 understand what it is u r opposing…& also what u may, however inadvertantly, contribute,2…if not planning 2 live in a bubble, or bowl (let me guess…the bowl of cherries – does that become fettuccini…)
    because the odds r, fsm is not going 2 overtake all of the other combined religions any time soon…& could b wrong about that, because i do not pretend 2 b correct on everything.

  7. nun sequitur says:

    http://grammar.about.com/od/mo/g/nonseqterm.htm

    The thing about this is, if u call any of my posts an ARGUMENT, this was not the intent. ..2 contribute 2 any (argument).

    • Danny says:

      The new name definitely suits you!

  8. nun sequitur says:

    & where some things do not seem 2 follow, this does not equal that no thing does. looks can b deceiving.

1 18 19 20 21 22 29

Leave a Reply