I THINK U GUYS ARE DECIEVED BY THE DEVIL AND HIS SPIRITS. MAKING THIS STUFF UP IS MERELY CREATED BY SOMEONE AND ITS AN EXCUSE TO HAVE AND DO WHAT UWANNA DO AND I FEEL THAT SOME SPAGHETTI MONSTER CANT EXPLAIN THE UNEXPLAINED AND CANT HELP ME SPIRITUALLY AS I COME TO REALIZE CHRIST HELPS ME MENTALLY AND PHYSICALLY AND I HAVE EVIDENCE THAT THIS IS TRUE AND TRY HIM CHRIST IS REAL AND PERSONALLY THATS MY EVIDENCE. PEOPLE ITS ALL MADE UP THE SPAGHETTI MONSTER ISNT REAL
-kathleen
i think u guys are decieved by the devil
Published by Bobby Henderson December 16th, 2008 in Hate Mail (and concerned criticism). 549 Comments
549 Responses to “i think u guys are decieved by the devil”
Grrr!
“This along should raise some level of suspension in you”
Let’s proofread and not hammertype in a rage! It should read:
“This alone should raise some level of suspicion in you”
Measure twice, cut once!
Thanks FSM!
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Oi, where do I begin with this trash people call mail….
“MAKING THIS STUFF UP IS MERELY CREATED BY SOMEONE AND ITS AN EXCUSE TO HAVE AND DO WHAT UWANNA DO ”
Yeah, sorta like how in the Crusades, knights murdered hundreds of people in the name of their Lord. UWANNA is not a word.Also, turn your caps lock off.
“AS I COME TO REALIZE CHRIST HELPS ME MENTALLY AND PHYSICALLY ”
He sure as hell didn’t help you mentally when you made this garbage mail. Also, turn your caps lock off.
“PEOPLE ITS ALL MADE UP THE SPAGHETTI MONSTER ISNT REAL”
Wait a second, she (or he, probably) actually thinks we truly believe this? I feel like crying. Also, turn your caps lock off. For every word you fully capitalize, THREE HUNDRED BABIES DIE OF RABIES.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
You are back, wheat?
It is really so bad that you have come to the conclusion, despite the faith of millions of Hindus, that no Brahma exists. Is it because you can’t scientifically test Brahma? Do you find comfort in your “logic”?
And I guess you won’t be affected by the words of God in the Koran, either. None of Muslims’ reality gets to you.
I used to think reality was supposed to be something objective, based on empirical evidence. I was wrong of course, according to you everyone is entitled to their own reality.
And obviously an old bearded man in the sky makes more sense than noodles in the sky. No questioning that.
By the way did you wee my last post in response to you? Any thoughts?
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Alex, you are so original. I’d never heard that.
By the way, did God love the dinosaurs too?
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
345 – January 14th, 2009 at – Alex Says:
“In the bible (Gods very own word)”
Now we can’t take you seriously.
“And He created us (human beings) and gave us a free will [snip]”
Free will? Do you even know what that is?
“And Gods punishment for sin is hell!”…[rant]…”God loves everyone”
That old chestnut.
Somehow how your cognitive functions accept and integrate contradictory comments such as these into a way of life that you try and spread like a disease, and it only pervades the minds of other confused people like yourself – the ones who maybe do need a saviour of sorts, like better teachers at school, or a smaller class. I would guess that you didn’t excel in any subject at school, and although it’s lovely that you found something you think you’re good at, you should put down that old book while you’re still young and pick up some non-fiction. There’s something for everyone, and whether it reinforces your thoughts on christianity, improves your spelling or causes you to alter your life drastically even against the wishes of your friends and family, well, at least you tried.
So many famous scientists began life associated with the christian church during the Dark Age and Middle Age and they were too frightened to publish papers for fear of being set on fire along with their work, but eventually it led to what is now known as the Age Of Reason, or the Age of Enlightenment, where science picked up again from where christians ruined everything about 1,500 years before. It was this chain of events and the embracement of reason and logic, and especially the dwindling of the church that brought us to the world you know today, with technology and freedom of speech, and of course, free will. Either way, imagine what would have happened if these famous scientists had not craftily incorporated god into their research papers so as not to be labelled heretic, thus promoting rational thought. We would still be in a flat world full of disease and possibly no electricity, as all science leading to the discovery of such would have been regarded as, “What? Are you saying god didn’t do this? Burn him! Burn him!” and you wouldn’t even imagine a world in which you do have medicine, and a mobile phone, and Facebook. The next famine or plague would be blamed your angry god, and in turn, the blame passed on to yourselves for not praying hard enough.
That, in my eyes, is a world not worth living in. We’ve come so far in such a short time with the advent of science. Science has led to the exponential growth of undisputed knowledge (unless you think “maybe this is all god’s dream” is a valid scientific theory, which most of us pondered on when we were seven) and the continued reduction of the size of the transistor, if the Dark Age hadn’t happened we would probably, honestly, be around a thousand years ahead in technology than we are today. This sounds quite a lot at first glance, but when you consider the meaning of the word “exponential” in terms of compiled knowledge in all areas of science, it becomes difficult to comprehend what effect this could have had on the world in this timescale…and the reason we don’t see this today is because of the aforementioned Dark Age. Being a huge fan of physics, computers, maths and all things requiring brainpower myself, I hope you can appreciate why I, for one, blame the Crusades, the destruction of the accomplishments of the Greeks, and the general suppression of reasonable thought, for the lack of progress we see today (although some progress has been made, the world’s still a horrific mess) and this is why people like me feel so strongly against religious dogma, blind faith and the spreading of such drivel.
Now, using technology to spread the word is what I call biting the hand that feeds. The rational thinkers who have dug us out of the 1,500-year rut have made these things possible and you are here using the internet to spread this disease to other weak minds. The internet is a tool for information, it was meant for educating the masses, NOT reaching out and preying on even more weak minds, so stop what you’re doing right now.
Right, off for a few jars, see you later.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
@ – Alex #345,
While you’re at it, Alex, Please go back and read some of the early history of the Church. Specifically, read Tertulian, Origin, Clement of Alexandria, Marcion, and Plotinus. After such reading, you will realize that all of the theology that you assert was under vigorous debate well into the third century of the common era. It never was as straight forward as you seem to think. What you read is the dogma that the winners did not suppress.
RAmen
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
@wheat:
You said that we “think so critically and with such ’scientific minds’” and go on to say “They find comfort in their ‘logic’”. Yet you also tell us to “THINK ABOUT IT”. It’s not really possible to think about something without “logic”. That’s why faith is called faith.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
@ Alex #345
“In the bible (Gods very own word)”
@ wheat #347
“They think that since they can’t scientifically test the creator of existence, than no such creator exists”….”Nobody here will be affected by the words of God”
Hi guys
I think I know how we can conduct a little experiment to test the validity of “Gods very own word”…”the words of God”.
First up, let’s investigate -
Matthew 17:20
And Jesus said unto them, Because of your unbelief: for verily I say unto you, If ye have faith as a grain of mustard seed, ye shall say unto this mountain, Remove hence to yonder place; and it shall remove; and nothing shall be impossible unto you.
Following up with-
Mark 16:18 They shall take up serpents; and if they drink any deadly thing, it shall not hurt them; they shall lay hands on the sick, and they shall recover.
Of course, our experimental procedure will require that our test subjects have faith and I also foresee most ethics committees being a little stubborn giving the green light for the second experiment, but we’ll play it by ear. Any volunteers?
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
@345 Alex,
So, you’re having a RELATIONSHIP with God? Has he popped the question yet?
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
To “Ape”: I don’t believe in God because millions of people do, just like I don’t follow Nazi-ism because there were millions of Nazi’s. I am a Christian because christianity is the only “religion” that demands that it’s followers LOVE everything that God has created and treat it with RESPECT. Hinduism is a selfish religion that focuses on being so emotionless that you feel nothing at all and then you reach “perfection”, … to be a thriving Muslim, one either has to be so caught up in rituals and pilgrimage that there is no room for personal growth, or kill as many non-believers as possible before committing suicide. The logic and reasoning behind my belief in the Christian God is that He puts His believers in a good place between selfishness and selflessness… I understand that his isn’t “proof” that He exists, but it does make a good case for Pascals Wager, yes?
littleanimal: a couple of questions… I’m not arguing or trying to debunk your debate, but how did this horrific thing called religion come out of the great greek accomplishments? who’s spark of insanity brought about the dark ages and in turn brought scientific knowledge to a halt?
Odai: I believe it was alex who told you to “THINK ABOUT IT” and I responded to him with “they try”.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Hi Wheat (#360),
“I am a Christian because christianity is the only “religion” that demands that it’s followers LOVE everything that God has created and treat it with RESPECT.”
That sounds lovely, unfortunately many Christians, particularly Independent Baptists don’t practise love towards homosexuals. If your God created homosexuals (and I believe it’s an innate quality not a choice) then most Christians do not love and respect his creations.
Also, if you loved and respected the people you believe God created, you might have taken the time to learn the differences between Hinduism and Buddhism. Your comments on Islam do not warrant a response they are so blinkered.
Pascal’s Wager relies on the benefit of believing being greater than the benefit of disbelieving. The benefits to you may well be worth it. To me, being Christian would involve betraying my reason, my morality and my sense of self and no benefit could outweigh that. The flaw in using Pascal’s wager as an argument is that it’s a personal argument, not one you can apply to anyone else.
I understand that you feel your faith has made you a better more balanced person; I’m glad. However, in you post you still show disrespect towards other faiths of which you are largely ignorant (no one who knew anything about them could confuse Hindism with Buddhism). You’re repeating intolerant religious dogma and that is why I feel you are not as good a person as you could be.
Cheers,
Dan
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Wheat, it is easy to see how ridiculous religions other than your own are. Not so easy to be objective about the religion you were brought up in. Case in point: you pay lip service to love and respect. But you only have to read your own post to see how intolerant you are of other religions.
And no, Pascal’s Wager is still invalid. You haven’t seen any proof that your religion is true and others aren’t(and you admit that freely), so you are not playing it safe; it is possible that after you die you’ll regret not having chosen a different religion. The whole point of Pascal’s Wager is playing it safe.
By the way, who was it that brought about the dark ages? The Pope. Ever head of the inquisition?
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Oh wheat, wheat, wheat–stop it, you’re only encouraging us.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Hinduism is a selfish religion????????????
When I think of India, selfish is the first trait I think of….. NOT!!
I think you’re confusing Hinduism with what you think Buddhism is.
Hindus believe that your actions in this life will affect your next life, they call it reincarnation. You’re not very well read are you!
Islam doesn’t allow for personal growth???? Rituals and pilgrimage? Killing and suicide? I gather you haven’t read the Koran and gain your “knowledge” of other religions from TV and your infertile imagination.
Christianity: IRA bombs in Ireland and England, Jonestown mass-suicide, Waco, Ku Klux Klan, Westboro Baptists, child molestations by Priests, TV Evangelist scandals, faith healers, Fatima, Lourdes, saints relics, shroud of Turin, Nuns who never speak, exorcism, speaking in tongues, selling indulgences, the Crusades, the Spanish Inquisition, the destruction of native people’s and ancient practices, witch trials and burnings, mass killing of Moslems right now……maybe you should look at the silly religion that you follow before casting stones at the other silly religions.
Your god holds off the rain for a parade while he lets thousands of children starve to death. He has to be the nastiest god man has ever thought up. Spaghetti is rarely nasty more tasty!
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
@360: it’s NOT the only religion that advises love. Oh, and “religion theory” and “applied religion” are two totally different things.
What you’re also saying, is that you just chose the religion which you most liked, not the one which seemed more likely?
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Wheat,
My FSM, you are a fucktard! Let me show you why. Your post says: “Christianity is the only “religion” that demands that it’s followers LOVE everything that God has created and treat it with RESPECT”.
I would argue that Islam does the same, but you hadn’t done any real study on that religion, so you give your own fucked-up opinion of it! Hinduism isn’t an “emotionless religion”, but you wouldn’t know that either-you hadn’t really delved into it enough to understand where its worshippers are going with their beliefs. Your biased opinion of other religions shows me that you know a lot about nothing! What in the hell is ” The logic and reasoning behind my belief in the Christian God is that He puts His believers in a good place between selfishness and selflessness” supposed to mean? If you were a true believer in the Jesus reformation of the Old Testament, you would know that the last thing he wanted you people to do was be selfish in anything! Let me also say that your notion of Pascal’s Wager is. stupid! See the Wiki quote here:
“Since there have been many religions throughout history, and therefore many potential gods, some assert that all of them need to be factored into the wager. This would lead to a high probability of believing in the wrong god, which destroys the mathematical advantage Pascal claimed with his Wager.” You haven’t a fucking clue about anything!
Indulge yourself for a few weeks at your local Italian restaurant, and come back with an argument that makes sense!
RAmen.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
360 – January 19th, 2009 at – wheat Says:
[snip]
littleanimal: a couple of questions… I’m not arguing or trying to debunk your debate, but how did this horrific thing called religion come out of the great greek accomplishments? who’s spark of insanity brought about the dark ages and in turn brought scientific knowledge to a halt?
[snip]
Wheat, cheers for coming back. Doesn’t happen a lot with the desirable kind.
“I’m not arguing or trying to debunk your debate”
Here for educational purposes is great news, I appreciate that. Although I’m no teacher I read extensively for my own personal development so I’ll try and answer your questions, but from your first paragraph in your latest post (to Ape) I think we have differing definitions of reason and logic, which means we couldn’t debate much anyway, had you wanted to. My reason and logic has “axioms”, yours seems to have a only a book to refer to, and using love as a reason is a kind of get-out-of-jail-free-card, we can all do that with or without religion. Surely you’ve seen that argument on here before?
“how did this horrific thing called religion come out of the great greek accomplishments?”
This horrific thing called religion came out of the great Greek accomplishments by… suppressing what was great simply by power in numbers, caused by the word of a new god spreading virulently throughout the West via threats of hell and damnation for not believing, rewards of eternal all-encompassing love for abiding by commandments which were already the humane thing to do anyway so nobody would in reality dare to disagree, news of a healer curing long-term and fatal disease inexplicably in a world lacking technology and medicine to cure themselves, in a world where most people feared the mystery of death more than anything else…these are all techniques that are given alternative names nowadays such as emotional blackmail, preying on the weak, catch 22, peer pressure, and other more technical terms, monophobia and the placebo effect is in there somewhere too. And eventually this destroyed all the Greek/Babylonian knowledge accumulated (if not accomplished themselves) when a mob of xians burned the library in Alexandria down in a fit of rage against non-believers and their 200,000 ‘heretical’ scientific scrolls, the biggest collection of knowledge ever. Right up until Descartes and Newton they still had to blag that i.e.”God put the planets in motion then left them to their own accord”, when even Copernicus knew that 200 years before. Imagine if it took researchers 200 years to decide to publish a paper on all things rather important, say the wheel, the heliocentric view of the solar system, or the lithium battery, for fear of reprisals from the religious zealots. Well this was real and not that long ago. And they weren’t only imprisoned, they were killed, by the xian church. Says a lot in your defense doesn’t it.
“who’s spark of insanity brought about the dark ages and in turn brought scientific knowledge to a halt?”
A large number of people were responsible, I don’t have time to chronicle 2000 years of history here just to spoon-feed you as I’d have to wade through my entire bookshelf, but if you really are interested and not just testing me (I suspect you might be judging by your good grammar), start with say, Plato, Aristotle, Ptolemy, Euclid, Pythagoras, Thales, Hypatia, the Library of Alexandria, then Julius Caesar, the rise and the fall of Rome, the crusades, or the Golden Age, the Dark Age, the Middle Age, the Age of Enlightenment. I don’t recommend using Wikipaedia as a source of reference as anyone can write stuff there, use books that have a well-established press and a time-honoured author (not THAT time-honoured though, eh?) and an extensive bibliography. Except for the crusades, look those up on Wiki if you like as there were loads but the answer to your second question is there.
Feel free to reply, wheat.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
I don’t expect you to look up all those names, by the way, they’re for everybody’s benefit who may be genuinely interested.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
This is great… I’ve gotten you guys all fired up. And over what? A intolerant comment about another religion? I thought this site was created to get religious thought out of informational institutions. This love and respect thing I referred to was about more than tolerating the human condition and smiling, it’s more like ‘do edifying things for fellow man (and woman) while dualistically trying point out and help them get rid of the things that separate them from SUPERnaturally connecting with God’. I don’t see any reason to be tolerant, I’m a Christian, I’m not supposed to be. If you want me to be informed about another religion, send me sources, recommend books, etc. I have no problem with being informed, nor do I care if I’m seen as intolerant… I believe the universe was created by a God that has an unconditional kind of love for humanity, what else do you expect from a mind like mine?
I post on this website because it’s just as entertaining to me as it is to you. My Christianity looks a lot different than most other christians who post… Mainly because there aren’t as many genuine christians as the census shows, nor has there ever been. littleanimals historical examples are some good indications of that. If the infamous figures of the early christian church understood the Bible they killed people in the name of, “Christian” might not leave a bad taste in so many peoples mouths… If todays Christians ACTUALLY followed what is being preached to them, the religion would definitely look different.
I’m kinda glad I stumbled across this little piece of blasphemy. That kathleen chick is a little nutty, do you think she checks this?
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Hinduism nor buddhism are selfish religions
hinduism nor buddhism even believes in a SELF. they beleive that the self is an illusion created by the mind. they also believe in selflessness. so before you go judging religions, take at least five minutes to try to understand the basics you dogmatic loser. you dont even study other religions and yet you already judge them, you are a horrible person and are no following what christ taught. HAHAHA you SUCK
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Wheat, you’re missing the point again: the reason this site if funny is because of idiotic trolls like you.
I’m not fired up, I’m laughing my head off.
My favorite part: “I don’t see any reason to be tolerant, I’m a Christian, I’m not supposed to be.”
If you only put that together with the love and respect garbage you posted last time! Your bible says a thing or two about hypocrites, remember?
And have this is mind: blasphemy is a victimless crime. Kind of, you know, like homosexuality.
Please keep visiting us. You are so much fun.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
ape con insightfulness… you must not have read my last post in its entirety, much like you probably haven’t read the Bible in its entirety. Which I don’t blame you, cause it’s not like i’ve read the Koran or whatever drivel buddhists/hindus read in their entirety… I’m just saying, our points seem to fall on different planes. You keep trying to insult my Christianity by exaggerating what I type and bashing on that… Respecting someone enough to show them a better way (yes I know “in my opinion”) isn’t intolerant, Sir…
My point is this: this book I’m reading keeps improving my life and giving it a purpose, and this website I’m posting comments on keeps confirming everything being taught at my youth group.
Historical events and scientific knowledge is embedded throughout this “good book”… I’d like someone to point out where it says the earth is flat… I haven’t come across that yet…
cheers Blasphemers,
and God Bless
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
It causes one pause to open a book that describes heaven as perfection then goes on to state, “…and there was war in Heaven.” Kind of shot things down for me right there.
Buddhist trainee priests are required to beg rice for their breakfast every morning to teach them humility. Judging by Ms Kathleen’s rant, she could use a bowlful of that.
I don’t believe in Christ as a supernatural being, but as a normal person, both a historical figure and philosopher. There are some written vague references to Christ having travelled with his uncle, his mother’s brother, who was a merchant. Part of these travels extended as far as India where Buddhism was already being practised. He would have seen the young priests begging in the streets and, having an inquiring mind, asked questions. Remember, he came from a culture that practised revenge as an ethical right; ‘an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth’. The concept of humility and love to one’s fellow humans, especially in the face of aggression, would have been completely foreign…and marvelous! This loving everybody, loving and respecting life, he would have embraced this philosophy. Christ would likely have been in his mid-teens, so this would have been powerfully impressive stuff.
Back home, in the Middle East, his country was a riot of dissenting factions, a situation only made worse by the presense of the Romans. Love thy neighbour. What a wonderful idea to try and glue a breaking country back together.
Too bad it didn’t work out. That run-in with the religious hierarchy surely wasn’t originally intended but, unfortunately, inevitable. It’s hard for preists in power to continue to ignore a guy who goes about telling people the priesthood is unnecessary.
When a man knows there is a strident demand for his head by those in power, he has only one choice to make and that is what ’spin’ to put on his own death, turning murder into self-sacrifice and martyrdom for the cause.
I’ve often wondered what books the man might have written if only he’d stayed out of religious politics.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Hi Wheat,
If you’re reading a book that’s improving your life and giving it purpose that’s great so long as it’s improving other people’s lives and not attacking them.
The bible does have parts that recomend it, don’t kill people is my favourite bit. It cannot be taken literally without acknowledging the bad parts though, like stoning people for working Sundays.
Unfortunatley, you also say you consider the Holy books of other religions to be “drivel”. Do you think there’s nothing good to be learned from these books? If so you’re wrong, there’s good and bad in them too. You’re improvement seems to have some way to go, will your youth group allow you to explore non-christian ideas with people outside the group (do they know you chat with Pastafarians)?
And I’m also concerned that you’ve been led to believe that historical events and scientific knowledge are “embedded throughout” the Bible. The bible was compiled (not written) centuries after the death of Christ. It included some gosples and left out others. It contradicts itself at various points. As a historical source it’s extremely unreliable. As a scientific source it is totally unusable, it may not say the earth is flat but it does say it’s possible to flood the earth and fit all it’s species into a large boat.
Keep an open mind Wheat, you can read your own books, take what you want from them. Gospel does not equal truth. Blind faith is no virtue, reasoned faith more so.
Bye bye Bible basher,
My best wishes
Dan
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
@wheat: I respectfully disagree that our book and yours are different. They’re both highly speculative works of fiction that are hilarious to quote from.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
@capt’n Igloo (#320)
Your response to wheat was exactly right. It is worth saving. Thank you.
RAmen
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
So the entire eveidence for christ’s existence is that he’s real.
At least it was mostly spelled right, could have done with a few commas…
whats up with all the caps lock use from these people?
i am sorry to hear that Sir David Attenborough has been receiving some nasty hatemail lately and i am inclined to agree with his veiw that a worm that can only survive by burrowing into the eyeballs of living things doesn’t seem like the creation of a ‘benevolent’ god… poor african kids…
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Sentence 1: 12 words.
Sentence 3: 10 words.
Sentence 2: 67 words. That’s the spirit!
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
You are absolutely stupid. Nowhere in the Bible does it talk about being tolerant of other religions. While we are to love others, we are not to be tolerant. However, I have a real hard time loving stupid.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
loving stupid is about as fun as kissing cigarette.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
“I don’t see any reason to be tolerant, I’m a Christian, I’m not supposed to be.”
Now there’s a person who is truly clueless.
Wheat, what does the line in the 23rd psalm mean to you, where it says: “Forgive us our trespasses, as we forgive those who trespass against us”?
Can you see anything resembling the concept of tolerance in that line? Maybe just a little?
Twit.
RAmen
ET
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Wheat – “I’d like someone to point out where it says the earth is flat…”
“Isaiah 11:12
12 And he shall set up an ensign for the nations, and shall assemble the outcasts of Israel, and gather together the dispersed of Judah from the FOUR CORNERS OF THE EARTH. (KJV)
Revelation 7:1
1 And after these things I saw four angels standing on FOUR CORNERS OF THE EARTH, holding the four winds of the earth, that the wind should not blow on the earth, nor on the sea, nor on any tree. (KJV) ”
How can the Earth have corners if it is round?
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Wheat,
Please point out this scientific knowledge the good book has so I can knock down your points, one by one! I enjoy people like you because you think you’re right, and yuo will do the same as others; fall into pathetic circular arguments. Isn’t it obvious that you’re in a youth group!
Shame you learn nothing but tripe.
RAmen.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
HELP, THE DEVIL IS CONTROLLING MY CAPS LOCK!!!
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
I think the reason why no one can take your points or arguments seriously is because you’ve made false claims without even bothering to check if they’re correct. By mixing Hinduism up with Buddhism you’ve clearly shown a significant level of ignorance, which, in your later posts you’ve pointed out that you’re aware of, and feel you are justified in being so. You’ve only told people that your arguments are not informed, and therefore cannot be counted as valid claims.
All anyone else here is trying to do, is either to encourage you to broaden your horizons, or more generously, provide you with information to better your knowledge of the world around you. I very much hope you can one day take the time to look at other cultures and belief systems and realise just how similar it all turns out to be, not just with each other, but with your own belief system too (specially that of Islam).
Best regards
Jon
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
This is getting old… so this’ll probably be my last post. (good riddance, right?)
One last stab at it, four corners = north south east west… that phrase is still used today. A spherical earth is described in Isaiah 40:21-22 – “the circle of the earth.”
The Bible was more scientifically accurate than scientific thought was during the time it was written. FOR EXAMPLE: the “scientists” of the day believed the earth was resting on a large animal, but in Job 26:7, the Bible explains that the earth was suspended in space.
Humorous how I’m accused of circular arguments when you guys use the same argument to counter everything I say… over and over and over and…
I do forgive those who trespass against me, personally. Because at the end of the day, and at the end of my days, it’s not about me. I don’t live my life for me… I carry someone else’s name, I define myself as a CHRISTian. That means I’ll forgive you for stealing from me, but I’m not going to condone stealing. Jesus didn’t smile and shake hands with the pagans… He didn’t even smile and shake hands with the Jewish leaders, they were corrupt. But instead of wiping them off the face of the earth for messing up their whole “promised land” business, He tried to reach them with words… I’m attempting to follow that Man/God.
Intolerance does not equal hate. When I say I’m intolerant, what I mean is I’m not going to sit back and watch the world run headfirst into Hell. If a fish becomes “intolerant” of being pushed downstream, it has to fight against the current. And if it swims upstream, it’ll swim headfirst into other fish.
Thank you all for using up almost three pages of comments arguing about “fairy-tales” with kid in youth group, I’m honored. I’ve mentioned to my Pastor that I’m looking at a site where people religiously worship pasta. And like I did when I first saw this website, all he could say was “really?” with a puzzled look on his face.
May God provide all of you with blessings and wisdom. I’m praying for a couple of you ;)
Peace and love,
Wheat
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
The Bible contains scientific and historical facts. Hahahahahahahaha.
There’s more chance of The Hitch-hikers Guide To The Galaxy containing scientific and historical facts than the bible
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Dear wheat,
So did you also miss the parts of the “holy” book where it talks about the 6000 year old world, talking snakes, or the great flood? Or are you among the retards who think any of this really happened? Got to admit it, our holy book makes more sense than yours.
I love the way you trap youself, first by saying you need not be tolerant, then adding that showing others a better way is not intolerance. I guess you still haven’t decided if calling other people’s books “drivel” is intolerance or not.
But I do agree with respecting others enough to show them a better way, which is why I invite to enjoy a better life in pastafarianism. It’s free, and you won’t lose anything if you are wrong, but you will have a beer volcano and stripper factory if you are right.
Think about it.
Your brother in Noodlyness,
RAmen
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Well, it sure beats an invisible bearded man who lives in the sky, who ruins peoples lives to make a point to saitain. That is just plain mean!
rAmen to the kindness of the flying speghety monster!
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Hmmm, Wheat is not really Christian. Grammar too good and doesn’t know anything about any religion or ancient history at all, just another kid trying to be a somebody.
I wish I hadn’t pretended to be nice to you, Wheat, I was just trying to keep you here so we could ask you real questions but you’re coming out with garbage designed to confuse and annoy so go fuck yourself loser. We’ll try again with someone else one day.
Wheat, may you be Touched by His Mouthwatering Holiness The one True God The Flying Spaghetti Monster. We will pray to our One True God The FSM For You.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
“I FEEL THAT SOME SPAGHETTI MONSTER CANT EXPLAIN THE UNEXPLAINED AND CANT HELP ME SPIRITUALLY”
Okey, but have you ever thought of that maybe we do? I thought your god aswell as ours supported free will. This is our will.
“PEOPLE ITS ALL MADE UP THE SPAGHETTI MONSTER ISNT REAL”
Please, prove us wrong :)
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Wheat’s gone. We win.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Dear Wheat,
It was nice chatting with you, seriously, I had a few good laughs. Show these pages to your pastor, I’m sure he will be proud of your trolling skills. You have never been interested in a genuine conversation. For example, you bring up Pascal’s wager(though you didn’t even know what it’s called). Once debunked though, you simply forgot about it and moved to another subject.
The Bible and the Koran are probably the biggest sources of misinformation in history. As another poster already siad, there is a lot more wisdom in the writings of ancient greeks like Thales and Pythagoras than in the bible-with no claims of divinity. And to this day, christian creationists in the US, and Muslims in Europe, are the biggest enemies of teaching of biology.
I am not surprised by your contradictions-love and intolerance. After all, you profess to follow the institution that is supposed to be about the poor and needy, yet its leader stock up on gold and precious pieces of art while millions of its followers are starving.
May his Noodly Goodness reach out and save you. Please be sure to bow your head, close your eyes, and talk to yourself about me-I’m sure it will do me a lot of good.
Ramen
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
At least we don’t have to FEAR our God. He doesn’t SCARE us. He fills us with joy! Plus we’re allowed to loath our neighbour, we’re allowed to say OMG, we make models of FSM out of pasta, we can do what we like on Sundays, we can bitch at our parents, we can covet our neighbours ox and donkey… hey thats what it says in the ten commandments.
our religion is very free and easy.
I like this
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
I before E except after C. Did you not learn this grammatical rhyme in school??? I did, at FSMU (Flying Spaghetti Monster University). BAD poster! And I’m a Christened Catholic. :-)
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
hahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!! fsm= fake, stupid moron. god= glorious, only deity.
Jesus Loves You (even if its not mutual)
p.s why is it a stereotype that xians have bad grammar? thats not true >:-|
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
What’s really sad is that Wheat is gonna waste a lot of time on following, loving and fearing his make believe god only to end up being wrong all along.
I’m sure Wheat is a nice enough kid, it’s just a shame they got to him before he had a chance to think for himself. Hopefully he’ll wake up one day and realise like so many others that this god business has been one big con.
And remember kids, that Cheesus bloke- No. Evidence. Whatsoever.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Jew jew bean, only the FSM decides who is touched by his appendage, and who is not. Who obviously have not seen his grace, and I am sorry for you. The FSM(pesto be upon him) is the only deity that can give you a stripper factory and a beer volcano. But is takes faith in him, to have salvation. You just can’t see the harm you are doing yourself.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
For someone who knows very little about anything, his spelling wasn’t bad. Like a word shitting machine. I’ve got a feeling his pastor was the one who put him up to it.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
It’s not our place to tell people that Pastafarianism is right. We can make fun of people for being stupid, close-minded assholes, but He doesn’t really care if some people don’t believe in him. If we want people to stop being, well, horrible, then we should, too.
I thought we were about loving our fellow man, even though we know we’ve reached a much higher level of enlightenment than they ever will?
You have me thinking I’ve made a mistake.
Well, I’M going to continue doing it right. I really think that if you just want to yell at people, even if they started it, that you should do it somewhere else.
RAmen.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0