Pretty sure your using this theory to make fun of real religion

Published August 11th, 2008 by Bobby Henderson

Pretty sure your using this theory to make fun of real religion. but its really quite stupid and lame because firstly, Noone was created in the image of the FSM (wtf!) secondly you have seriously zero proof of any writings from ancient times. Thirdly you are probably some year six kid looking for attention over the internet cos in life, you’re too much of a idiot for anyone to pay attention to.
-BR



160 Responses to “Pretty sure your using this theory to make fun of real religion”

1 2 3 20
  1. Brian says:

    How would ancient writings be relevant to anything?

  2. Physics Wench says:

    Noone? Who or what is Noone? And why does he/she/it look like the FSM?
    Also, Bobby is not a “year six kid looking for attention over the internet,” but rather the Holy Prophet of the Flying Spaghetti Monster.
    If he were six, as you seem to believe, I would think that would make this endeavor even more impressive.

  3. mikeb says:

    What constitues a “real” religion? Three thousands years ago, Christianity wasn’t a “real” religion, and to be honest when you think about it, Christianity is just a sect of Judaism.

  4. Melissa Jackson says:

    “seriously zero proof of any writings from ancient times”
    Thats every religion out the window then. So tell me, what is a real religion?

  5. Dennis says:

    “Thirdly you are probably some year six kid looking…”

    What? That doesn’t make sense. How old are you… six?

  6. Mac N. Cheez says:

    you have a book. we have a book.

    our book has a graph for proof. yours doesn’t.

    we win. pirates rule.

    (i will admit though, that your book has better sex stories than ours)

    Ezekiel 23:19-20
    Yet she increased her prostitution, remembering the days of her youth when she engaged in prostitution in the land of Egypt. She lusted after their genitals – as large as those of donkeys, and their seminal emission was as strong as that of stallions.

  7. David J says:

    “your” = 2nd person singular or plural possessive pronoun
    “you’re” = contraction for “you are” (also singular or plural)

    “its” – possessive attributive adjective of “it”
    “it’s” – contraction for “it is.”

    “Noone” – uknown meaning.
    “No one” – known meaning.

    “cos” – EMO-speak for “cuz”
    “cuz” – truncated form of “because”
    “because” – conjunction showing causality

    Who is the idiot again?

  8. techskeptic says:

    who is Noone?!?!? he was created in the image of FSM?!?!?

    We gotta meet this guy! Sounds like our prophet!

    Not sure what makes him htinnk his religion is any more ‘real’ than this one.

    #2 cracked me up, if this dipshit actually read one of the ancient bibles he would have a tough time reconciling it with the trash he reads now. As for #3, well I’m 40…….

1 2 3 20

Leave a Reply