Do you know any building that did not have a builder?

Published April 11th, 2008 by Bobby Henderson

1. Do you know any building that did not have a builder? Yes? No?
2. Do you know any painting that did not have a painter? Yes? No?
3. Do you know any car that did not have a maker? Yes? No?
If you answered “Yes” to any of those statements… please give details:______________________…



171 Responses to “Do you know any building that did not have a builder?”

1 3 4 5 6 7 21
  1. Sarah says:

    1. Do you know any building that can procreate? Yes? No?
    2. Do you know any painting that can procreate? Yes? No?
    3. Do you know any car that can procreate? Yes? No?
    If you answered “Yes” to any of those statements… please give details:______________________… (especially about the buildings and the car – I’d like a new house an car but cannot afford to buy them; hey, do you think if I bred my parents’ house with my car that the offspring would be a motor-home or a mobile home (i.e. a trailer)?)

  2. Cape Buffalo says:

    Didn’t we alerady comment about this once before? Do these people not read the other hate mail, or do they just not get it?

  3. anonymous says:

    1. Do you know any building that did not have a builder? Yes? No?
    Yes. Ancient people used to live in natural caves. This is backed up by cultural debris found in caves, and the fact that people will still use one for shelter today. Those were built by forces of nature. You have no God.

    2. Do you know any painting that did not have a painter? Yes? No?
    There are many natural depictions of beauty that are equivalent to being painted, even if paint wasn’t the substance used. Those were built by forced of nature. You have no God.

    3. Do you know any car that did not have a maker? Yes? No?
    There are many methods of locomotion besides cars. Legs, fins, and even truly rotating bacterial propellers. Those were built by forces of nature. You have no God.

    If you answered “Yes” to any of those statements… please give details:
    The details are this: You refuse to believe that anything except for a creative entity could have created all that you know about. If you are right, then the being that created all of this is far more complex than the resulting creation, and must, therefore, have been created by something yet more complex, ad infinitum. To say that God has ‘Always’ existed is to simply deny that anything has a reason by way of proxy from the top down, so why would YOU need God as a _REASON_ if God itself exists without reason for existing(note that you would then be the one who believes in an entity that exists for no reason or explanation, not me). If you think that everything was “Intelligently Designed”, then why wasn’t it actually “intelligently” designed, rather than haphazardly thrown together in a big god damned hurry. If you still think there’s a God, then let me explain that you’re ABSOLUTELY CORRECT, because the ALMIGHTY Flying Spaghetti Monster is that God, and as long as you don’t have to explain what makes you wrong, my notions are backed by the same evidence yours are, as well as science itself on top of those reasons you use.

    Kudos to Dawkins for the reasoning I was missing. Too bad I’ll never get a response from this person. I’d be interested in knowing exactly why the FSM is immune from this sort of attack(though, he does generally alter facts to agree with his own existence), but failing a response, I can conclude that no such argument exists and that their god is unprovable, due to their lack of an acceptable defense, while the Almighty Flying Spaghetti Monster is completely safe from any attack by heathens of the sort who wrote the intelligent defecation message displayed above, because no defense for their puny entity could be found.

  4. Draconic says:

    Yes to all three, but only because we have massive evidence to support it.

    EPIC FAIL

  5. Basil Baxter says:

    Dear Matt,

    Basil Baxter Loves You.

    “This does not mean that I will run around Axe murdering everyone”

    Basil Baxter is disappointed. Are you sure you would not like to try?

  6. Shaela says:

    Ha ha…..linear thought makes me laugh…….and..cry….

  7. The Rabid Baby says:

    Well, actually, there was this one time with an unstable lorry of paint, a large concrete slab and a very ingenuitive tramp….

    Just kidding :P

    But if your pointing our that the universe needs to have a maker, its no good trying to compare it to stuff on earth. It’s currently predicted that the first few minutes after the big bang were just filled with random particles and anti-particles. NO-ONE knows what it would have been like.

    I believe stephen hawking has some interesting theories on the birth of the universe, read his book “a brief history of time”, it’s very interesting.

  8. Cap'n Ollie says:

    Show your workings.

1 3 4 5 6 7 21

Leave a Reply