The Tampa Tribune reports the Polk County School Board was caught by surprise by the widespread response to their interest in Intelligent Design. They have decided not to pursue the teaching of Intelligent Design.
I suppose it’s a victory for science, but I was optimistic about Polk County being the first to introduce Pastafarian theories into the curriculum.
The article by Billy Townsend is titled “Polk Needled, Noodled in Evolution Flap“.
Public floggings hurt, even when administered by satirical sacred noodles.
Ask the Polk County School Board. The panel made news last month when five of its seven members declared a personal belief in the concept of intelligent design, the religiously based explanation of the development of life believed in by many Christians.
Four of those five sympathetic board members said they would like to see intelligent design taught in Polk schools as an alternative to Darwinian evolution, at a time when new state standards mentioning evolution by name for the first time are under consideration.
Just like that, it appeared the Darwin wars had found their newest battlefield.
Yet a few weeks later, the controversy is dying with a whimper. There’s no board support for a challenge to the proposed standards. Some of the five school board members blame the local newspaper for trying to start a fight.
“It’s not our agenda,” said Tim Harris, one of the board members. “My personal opinion and how I vote don’t always jibe.”
What happened? You can start with the Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster.
The satirical religious Web site asserts that an omnipotent, airborne clump of spaghetti intelligently designed all life with the deft touch of its “noodly appendage.” Adherents call themselves Pastafarians. They deluged Polk school board members with e-mail demanding equal time for Flying Spaghetti Monsterism’s version of intelligent design.
“They’ve made us the laughingstock of the world,” said Margaret Lofton, a school board member who supports intelligent design.
It’s an excellent article. I’m even quoted a couple times. I admit it sounds like I’m against the inclusion of supernatural theories in science, which would include Pastafarian beliefs as well as Intelligent Design, but I assure you my statements are part of a larger strategy of some sort, in the best interest of Pastafarianism.
Here’s the article, enjoy!
this santa baby is a lot of garbage… lets just remember that the earth was created by him and we form him and what a joke the humanity is…. god is a spirit
I think was a victory as well, but not in the same way as everyone else. This is a victory FOR Polk County Kids and a MAJOR VICTORY for the school board. They’ve prooven (at least to me) that they are not completely retarded. I know that is not nice to say.
Let me rephrase in PC-speak:
I think some members of the school board have pulled their heads out of their medieval asses.
Still too harsh? How about this?
The Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster has enlightened the school board.
HOOORAAAHMEN!!
yay!
Alleluia! to the FSM. Keep up the good work brethren.
Just saw a piece by Christain Amanpour called “God’s Warriors”. In it she interviewed Falwelll in the last week of his life (he didn’t know it then, but he would be found dead at his desk in a few days). He was fat as a pig, and he railed against the usual targets. Funny how he neglected to mention gluttony as a sin. (It’s one of the seven capital sins, as those of us who come form a religious background know)
Anyway, in this the last week of his life, he explained to Chritianne how he fantasized Chelsea Clinton would come to interview him and ask him the three things he feared most in the future.
His answer: “Osama, Obama, and yo mamma.” Imagine that. Here he was nearly dead of gluttony induced heart failure and all he could fantasize about was disrespectding the daughter of an ex-president, by dissing her mother. Then these people talk about how they are hated by the secular establishment–as if it is without cause when they take gratituitous shots at people who aren’t even asking them their opinion. Naturally he took no ownership for the mess in Iraq, the damage Bush/Cheney have done to the US constitution, the illegal surveillence of American they conduct, the $3.00 a gallon gasoline they ushered in, the bogus threat inflation on Iran, the numerous scandals of Bush, et al.
After all, what could be worse than Chelsea’s momma. Nothing. Unless it’s Chelsea’s momma straightening out Bush’s mess and setting the country on the right course. The success of Hillary or any reasonably moderate scandal-free democrat would drive a stake through the heart of the right wing like nothing else and Falwell knew it.
I have just found out about this via Panda’s Thumb. I have to congratulate all your members on keeping such a vigilant eye on the insidious infiltration of ID into American science classrooms.
I am Australian and a grandmother who sees this poverty-ridden cousin of creationism starting to pop its head up in Australia. I doubt that it will get a foothold, but the fact that it is even mentioned in highly secular Australia is enough to concern me.
You have my support in all your endeavours. Well done.
@Veronique Jan 3rd, 2008 at 11:24 pm
“but the fact that it is even mentioned in highly secular Australia is enough to concern me.”
.
My thoughts and feelings exactly! (from a fellow Aussie)
RAmen
Pandas Thumb…that reminds me…
@BC Dec 19th, 2007 at 7:29 pm
“Unfortunately, the debate is not only at the county level, as another part of the same article in St. Pete Times reports,
At least one member of the state Board of Education has objected to the proposed standards. Donna Callaway told a religious newspaper in Jacksonville that evolution “should not be taught to the exclusion of other theories of the origins of life.”
Additionally, Selena “Charlie” Carraway, program manager for the state Department of Education’s Office of Instructional Materials, has urged fellow Christians to fight the inclusion of evolution in the science curriculum.
As a science teacher, we appreciate the recognition that the CFSM has brought, and encourage your members to post at the education blog, “The Gradebook”. At least one board member is reading the blog, as she responded to a post. Thanks!”
.
http://blogs.tampabay.com/schools/2007/12/boe-member-i-wa.html
.
@BC Dec 19th, 2007 at 7:29 pm
I actually wrote this response to your post and posted it on about 28/29th DEC….I think I had too many links in it and it didn’t go. I decided not to repost it till now because I thought all the Pirates had well and truely earned a relaxing Holiday break from the school board/BoE creationist sales BS!
.
Well….anyway….the BoE science standards come up for the vote in Feb. (I think?)
.
My original post to BC
@BC
Yep!
As the school board members allude to this in the OP article….
“The pro-intelligent design board members say they now recognize that the new standards are a state issue and there’s nothing they can do about them, even if they’d like to.”
.
Coincidence that I’d previously missed, and just came across your post today. The Pandas Thumb, an impressive anti-creation/ID site had recently posted, (27th Dec.) reference and links of the CoFSM Polk County effort. :))
Among the comments following that post on PT were a couple of particular interest re the Florida BoE proposed science standards:
.
The second one (from the same poster) contains a link to a legal letter sent to the BoE from a Forida attorney, who specialises in religious liberty and constitutional law, requesting changes in the wording of the BoE’s proposed new science education standards.
.
http://pandasthumb.org/archives/2007/12/noodled-evoluti.html#comment-138651
.
.
Those members of the Florida Board of Education pushing to have ID included in the new State Science Standards also (probably more so) seriously need to be made aware of ALL of the alternative theories.
RAmen
@Veronique Jan 3rd, 2008 at 11:24 pm
“but the fact that it is even mentioned in highly secular Australia is enough to concern me.”
.
My thoughts and feelings exactly! (from a fellow Aussie :)
RAmen
Pandas Thumb…that reminds me…
@BC Dec 19th, 2007 at 7:29 pm
“Unfortunately, the debate is not only at the county level, as another part of the same article in St. Pete Times reports,
At least one member of the state Board of Education has objected to the proposed standards. Donna Callaway told a religious newspaper in Jacksonville that evolution “should not be taught to the exclusion of other theories of the origins of life.”
Additionally, Selena “Charlie” Carraway, program manager for the state Department of Education’s Office of Instructional Materials, has urged fellow Christians to fight the inclusion of evolution in the science curriculum.
As a science teacher, we appreciate the recognition that the CFSM has brought, and encourage your members to post at the education blog, “The Gradebook”. At least one board member is reading the blog, as she responded to a post. Thanks!”
.
http://blogs.tampabay.com/schools/2007/12/boe-member-i-wa.html
.
@BC Dec 19th, 2007 at 7:29 pm
I actually wrote this response to your post and posted it on about 28/29th DEC….I think I had too many links in it and it didn’t go. I decided not to repost it till now because I thought all the Pirates had well and truly earned a relaxing Holiday break from the school board/BoE creationist sales BS!
.
Well….anyway….the BoE science standards come up for the vote in Feb. (I think?)
.
My original post to BC
@BC
Yep!
As the school board members allude to this in the OP article….
“The pro-intelligent design board members say they now recognize that the new standards are a state issue and there’s nothing they can do about them, even if they’d like to.”
.
Coincidence that I’d previously missed, and just came across your post today. The Pandas Thumb, an impressive anti-creation/ID site had recently posted, (27th Dec.) reference and links of the CoFSM Polk County effort. :))
Among the comments following that post on PT were a couple of particular interest re the Florida BoE proposed science standards:
.
The second one (from the same poster) contains a link to a legal letter sent to the BoE from a Forida attorney, who specialises in religious liberty and constitutional law, requesting changes in the wording of the BoE’s proposed new science education standards.
.
http://pandasthumb.org/archives/2007/12/noodled-evoluti.html#comment-138651
.
.
Those members of the Florida Board of Education pushing to have ID included in the new State Science Standards also (probably more so) seriously need to be made aware of ALL of the alternative theories.
RAmen