neat-o-rama’s myths and truths about pirates

pirates.jpg

From our friends at neat-o-rama, 7 Myths and Truths about Pirates:

We’ve all got an idea of what it was like to be a pirate in the 1700s - but a lot of it is pure Hollywood hooey. Here’s a few of our most common misconceptions about pirates … and the truth about them.

Here’s the link

67 Responses to “neat-o-rama's myths and truths about pirates”


Pages: « 1 [2] 3 4 » Show All

  1. 21 Alex Nov 26th, 2007 at 4:22 am

    Whoops. Let me be more specific… http://www.idnet.com.au/files/pdf/PDF%20ID_Website_10_Questions.PDF

    Bottom of page 3.

    Cheers!

  2. 22 Cogito Nov 26th, 2007 at 9:28 am

    They call us “demeaning”. How rude.

  3. 23 storm petrel Nov 26th, 2007 at 12:12 pm

    They compare themselves to Gailileo as being censored, they really should read up on their history a bit, the church turned on his theories because they disagreed with the bible, the IDiots turn on eveolution because it disagrees with the bible…

  4. 24 rmw Nov 26th, 2007 at 12:26 pm

    @Alex–thanks for the link. Here’s my favorite part:
    .
    “By censoring ID, other disciplines like archaeology, SETI, cosmology, and criminology, and many
    other areas of scientific endeavour that rely on ID theory are in danger of also being relegated to the
    realm of pseudo-science. All this is done to suppress discussion about the application of ID theory
    to biochemistry. Open minded people will look deeper and evaluate the evidence themselves.”
    .
    Right, because archaeologists and cosmologists/astronomers and the like will all be “pseudo-science” because they are…I dunno…heretics, I suppose. Heretics who don’t see the divinity of God in their work, but instead look at observable facts and extrapolate from there. Couple hundred years ago, such blashphemy would’ve sent you to be burned at the stake. We Pastafarians, and scientists, and all others who don’t believe that ID and science should be taught side-by-side, or the one-and-the-same, are probably lucky that there are no stake-burnings anymore. And Galileo must be turning over in his grave!
    .
    Loved the pirate article. The History Channel had a good documentary on pirates about a year or so ago. It was call “The Real Caribbean Pirates.” I recommend it.

  5. 25 Wench.Nikkiee Nov 26th, 2007 at 1:51 pm

    @storm petrel Nov 26th, 2007 at 12:12 pm
    “They compare themselves to Gailileo as being censored”
    .

    The Crackpot Index
    #34.
    40 points for claiming that the “scientific establishment” is engaged in a “conspiracy” to prevent your work from gaining its well-deserved fame, or suchlike.

    #35.
    40 points for comparing yourself to Galileo, suggesting that a modern-day Inquisition is hard at work on your case, and so on.

    #36.
    40 points for claiming that when your theory is finally appreciated, present-day science will be seen for the sham it truly is. (30 more points for fantasizing about show trials in which scientists who mocked your theories will be forced to recant.)

    #37
    50 points for claiming you have a revolutionary theory but giving no concrete testable predictions.
    .
    http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/crackpot.html

  6. 26 storm petrel Nov 26th, 2007 at 2:04 pm

    So the IDiots must have about a thousand points by now? Do they get extra for repitition?

  7. 27 rmw Nov 26th, 2007 at 2:48 pm

    @Wench.Nikkiee@–I think the Crackpot Index would make a nice companion to the Fuckwit Finder used for hatemail.
    .
    BTW, this is my favorite: 30 points for claiming that your theories were developed by an extraterrestrial civilization (without good evidence).

  8. 28 ☠DutchPastaGuy☠ Nov 26th, 2007 at 3:30 pm

    @Nikkiee
    Thanks for the crackpot index, I hadn’t seen that one before I think. Another amusing bookmark for me.

  9. 29 rmw Nov 26th, 2007 at 4:07 pm

    @storm petrel–I didn’t see any points value for repetition, but I think it needs to be added. So, let’s say 100 points for constantly bringing up your fucktard theory, as if by saying it enough times, it’ll eventually be correct.

  10. 30 storm petrel Nov 26th, 2007 at 4:20 pm

    Isn’t one of the definitions of insanity doing the exact same thing over and over again and expecting a different result?

  11. 31 rmw Nov 26th, 2007 at 4:33 pm

    @storm petrel–Hahahahahahaha!!! I believe you’re right.

  12. 32 rmw Nov 26th, 2007 at 6:02 pm

    I’ve noticed the FSM now has a Santa hat. Yes, the holiday season doth approach. A time to spend too much, drink too much, eath too much, and pretty much just do everything in excess. Sounds down-right piratey to me.

  13. 33 PacificPam Nov 26th, 2007 at 8:01 pm

    Yep, remember chrisitanity took pretty much everything from other religions…sooo, they do have a resemblance to us.
    .

  14. 34 El Peatieablo Nov 26th, 2007 at 8:32 pm

    @rmw
    FSM wearing a Santa hat? Peter Popoff will be overjoyed!

  15. 35 PacificPam Nov 26th, 2007 at 9:19 pm

    @El Peatieablo - would you mind explaining me why?

  16. 36 El Peatieablo Nov 26th, 2007 at 9:34 pm

    @PacificPam
    A while ago he was questing for Santa… Those were the days… :)

  17. 37 PacificPam Nov 26th, 2007 at 9:39 pm

    Oh, Santa is actually the FSM….that explains why he get to all the houses in only one night…all that bunch of noodly appendages…hahahahaha…I can tell my mom that santa exists and is good.

  18. 38 PacificPam Nov 26th, 2007 at 9:55 pm

    hahaha

  19. 39 PacificPam Nov 26th, 2007 at 10:00 pm

    And Adam was a horny man…

  20. 40 Red Dutch Pasta Wench Nov 27th, 2007 at 12:05 am

    Yes, he lusted after all the women in the world………

Pages: « 1 [2] 3 4 » Show All

Leave a Reply

Connect with other Pastafarians

Recent Comments

Propaganda Buttons

Add these buttons to your site:



Contribute

The Church of the FSM is looking for content. Details here

Support the Cause

The Church is funded entirely by your purchases of FSM merchandise. Thank you for your support.

Purchase the Gospel

An elaborate spoof on Intelligent Design, The Gospel of the Flying Spaghetti Monster is neither too elaborate nor too spoofy to succeed in nailing the fallacies of ID. It's even wackier than Jonathan Swift's suggestion that the Irish eat their children as a way to keep them from being a burden, and it may offend just as many people, but Henderson, described elsewhere as a 25-year-old "out-of-work physics major," puts satire to the same serious use that Swift did. Oh, yes, it is very funny. -- Scientific American

Misc.

Bobby's Personal Blog

Contact Bobby: Contact Me


Website monitor by Killerwebstats.com

 

Support the Arts:

Fine art taco photography



Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 License. This means you're free to use the content but not sell it. More Details