Global warming concensus wrong

Our friends at Daily Kos report that the global warming models that were believed to be true by most scientists are likely wrong.

The world’s climate experts have long been making some very dire predictions about Global Warming. Because they are predictions, they rely very heavily on computer models.

Many people– especially conservatives– warned about this. They pointed out that models are prone to many errors, and the scientific consensus is not always right.

Other people chose to rely on the scientific consensus. Honesty compels me to admit that I was in this group. We didn’t think think the consensus was the last word, but we did believe it was the best window to the future a non-specialist could look through.

The consensus of climate experts were wrong. Absolutely, verifiably wrong. The computer models were wrong. They simply do not match reality.

It’s almost like the scientists overlooked something, another factor somewhere…

hq-graphcopy2_800.jpg

Daily Kos doesn’t mention the Pastafarian theory of Global Warming, but the article is worth reading, anyway: here.

241 Responses to “Global warming concensus wrong”


Pages: « 14 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 11 1213 » Show All

  1. 141 BBC!! Oct 31st, 2007 at 1:51 pm

    @ pacificpam,
    what?
    red bull has the testes of a bull in the ingrediants ya know….

  2. 142 PacificPam (IF) Oct 31st, 2007 at 1:52 pm

    I miss my bosses!
    Damn them…

  3. 143 BBC!! Oct 31st, 2007 at 1:52 pm

    No..
    sadly… :’(
    *sniffsniff*

  4. 144 Noodly0ne Oct 31st, 2007 at 1:52 pm

    I wanna work in Real Estate too, if I get to post here all day!

  5. 145 BBC!! Oct 31st, 2007 at 1:52 pm

    gosh dang them all to heck..

  6. 146 PacificPam (IF) Oct 31st, 2007 at 1:52 pm

    You said you needed to get a man, BBC. Did you find one, yet?

  7. 147 BBC!! Oct 31st, 2007 at 1:53 pm

    yeah…actually i shouldnt be doing this….

  8. 148 PacificPam (IF) Oct 31st, 2007 at 1:53 pm

    So that would be t-bagging a bull?

  9. 149 PacificPam (IF) Oct 31st, 2007 at 1:53 pm

    Nasty! I’m sorry.

  10. 150 Noodly0ne Oct 31st, 2007 at 1:54 pm

    Good luck BBC!!!

  11. 151 BBC!! Oct 31st, 2007 at 1:54 pm

    no i didn’t…
    thats whats sad… :’(
    *sniffsniff*

  12. 152 Noodly0ne Oct 31st, 2007 at 1:54 pm

    SICK:O

  13. 153 BBC!! Oct 31st, 2007 at 1:54 pm

    thanks

  14. 154 Noodly0ne Oct 31st, 2007 at 1:55 pm

    No problem, mate.

  15. 155 PacificPam (IF) Oct 31st, 2007 at 1:55 pm

    I know…I said I was sorry!

  16. 156 Noodly0ne Oct 31st, 2007 at 1:55 pm

    OK

  17. 157 BBC!! Oct 31st, 2007 at 1:56 pm

    haha its ok i hadn’t seen what you said after you asked if i found a man the second time

  18. 158 Noodly0ne Oct 31st, 2007 at 1:56 pm

    Did you wrap your passport yet?

  19. 159 PacificPam (IF) Oct 31st, 2007 at 1:56 pm

    BBC…My boss is a jew…he can get you an Old jew that is dying and you can inherit all of his fortune. You only give him 25% of what he leaves you.

  20. 160 BBC!! Oct 31st, 2007 at 1:56 pm

    no worries mate?

Pages: « 14 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 11 1213 » Show All

Leave a Reply

Connect with other Pastafarians

Recent Comments

Propaganda Buttons

Add these buttons to your site:



Contribute

The Church of the FSM is looking for content. Details here

Support the Cause

The Church is funded entirely by your purchases of FSM merchandise. Thank you for your support.

Purchase the Gospel

An elaborate spoof on Intelligent Design, The Gospel of the Flying Spaghetti Monster is neither too elaborate nor too spoofy to succeed in nailing the fallacies of ID. It's even wackier than Jonathan Swift's suggestion that the Irish eat their children as a way to keep them from being a burden, and it may offend just as many people, but Henderson, described elsewhere as a 25-year-old "out-of-work physics major," puts satire to the same serious use that Swift did. Oh, yes, it is very funny. -- Scientific American

Misc.

Bobby's Personal Blog

Contact Bobby: Contact Me


Website monitor by Killerwebstats.com

 

Support the Arts:

Fine art taco photography



Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 License. This means you're free to use the content but not sell it. More Details