Hey, I’m moving everything over to a new server. Things might look a little strange until it’s done.
Update – 5/28/07, 1PM –
Still working on getting things set up. Discussion Forum is back up.
Connect
Contribute
The Church of the FSM is always looking for content. Details here
Support the Cause
The Church is funded entirely by your purchases of FSM merchandise. Thank you for your support.
Purchase the Gospel
Purchase from
Amazon.com
Purchase from BN.com
An elaborate spoof on Intelligent Design, The Gospel of the Flying Spaghetti Monster is neither too elaborate nor too spoofy to succeed in nailing the fallacies of ID. It's even wackier than Jonathan Swift's suggestion that the Irish eat their children as a way to keep them from being a burden, and it may offend just as many people, but Henderson, described elsewhere as a 25-year-old "out-of-work physics major," puts satire to the same serious use that Swift did. Oh, yes, it is very funny. -- Scientific American
Give
Propaganda Buttons
Add these buttons to your site:
Miscellaneous
Bobby's Blog
Contact Bobby: Contact Me
A shag?
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
RECENT COMMENTS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
“A shag?”
.
I suppose that would be nice.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Oh, yeah, those!
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Maybe, maybe:
* Bobby has “been bought out” by the Google Church;
* Bobby has never existed;
* This site has never existed;
* We only think this site ever existed;
* We’re only a small bunch of loonies thinking this site ever existed;
* We only think we’re posting here;
* We’re only a small bunch of loonies thinking we’re posting here;
* We don’t exist at all;
* We’re only a small bunch of loonies thinking we exist at all.
.
RAmen nevertheless.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
I think the “Small bunch of loonies” is a bit too much of a recurring theme there JB!
Speak for yourself! ;P
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
http://www.venganza.org/about/open-letter/discussion
.
Wench Nikkiee Jun 3rd, 2007 at 1:35 pm
To new visitors to the Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster…..hellooooo and welcome.
The Churches regular posters have all been locked up in one of our back rooms.
Hopefully we will all be back over here as well shortly…..won’t we PROPHET Bobby??? (:))
.
Wench Nikkiee Jun 3rd, 2007 at 1:46 pm
You’ll find us all protesting against this injustice at:
.
http://www.venganza.org/2007/05/27/new-server.htm
.
Please drop by….we’d love to hear from you (:))
.
:)))))))
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
@Professor B♥♥ty Jun 3rd, 2007 at 1:51 pm “I think the “Small bunch of loonies” is a bit too much of a recurring theme there JB! Speak for yourself! ;P”
.
My knowledge of Shakespeare’s tongue is too limited to find enough synonyms to/for/of (see?) the expression “small bunch of loonies”. Could you offer some, puhlease? ;)
.
RAmen to all noodly loonies!
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
I’m loonie! Do I win a prize! I hope it’s pie! No, not pie. I hope it’s…
RECENT COMMENTS!!!!!!!!!!!
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
OMFSM This is the funniest stuff I’ve seen on the site recently! Of course it’s possible I missed a bunch because of the lack of Recent Comments. What’s up with that anyway? Does anyone know why we still don’t have recent comments? It’s really bloody annoying! :))))
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
I am sure what you meant to say was…
“A select group of intelligent, funny, caring and sexy individuals”
Just try to speak the language better will you?
*Booty wanders off muttering “Bloody foreigners” under her breath*
;P
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Good job, Wench Nikkiee.
.
Question: have any of us e-mailed Prophet Bobby about this directly? I haven’t. If you have, please speak up. If not I’ll send him an e-mail about the
.
MYSTERIOUS
.
LACK
.
OF
.
RECENT
.
COMMENTS!
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
The lack of recent comments has made me really hungry, I’m off for a snack!
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
@ Jean Bart – we are for certain a small bunch of loonies! No argument from this wench!! :))
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Tie your shoes? Why, that’s easy peasy lemon squeezy!
Beat your meat? Why, that’s easy peasy Japanesey!
As a Pastafarian, condemn Prophet Bobby for not giving us our well-deserved Recent Comments? Why, that’s easy peasy puddin’n'pie!
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
I am *not* a loonie – the rice krispies told me so just this morning!
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
@Rowdier Wench Jun 3rd, 2007 at 1:58 pm “OMFSM This is the funniest stuff I’ve seen on the site recently! Of course it’s possible I missed a bunch because of the lack of Recent Comments. What’s up with that anyway? Does anyone know why we still don’t have recent comments? It’s really bloody annoying! :))))”
.
We’re supposed to use carrier pigeons to communicate and tell each other how things are on this site. If we feed them Monsanto’s GMS (Genetically Modified Stuff), they should be able to deal with time zones.
.
Ramen to our feathery friends minus one (the one that managed to get elected N00B of the Month on Uncyclopedia).
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Who was elected Noob of the Month?
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
*Booty starts off a chorus of “poisoning pigeons in the park”*
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
@Aristotle, God of Satire Jun 3rd, 2007 at 2:05 pm “Who was elected Noob of the Month?”
.
Hey, you’re not paying attention there. A PIGEON, I was talking about PIGEONS, you know, PIDGINS!
.
RAmen to attent readers.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
@ JB – My carrier pigeons have been a bit tired recently! I’ll pop round to the shop and pick up some of that GMS and they’ll be fixed up in no time!! :)))
.
Doh! I didn’t get a chance to vote! Good that he still got elected. I’m proud!!! Sorry ۞, that I didn’t get a chance to vote…
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
No, ROwdier, he didn’t some other tosser beat him to it, we are re-voting for him for this month though.
I have to go to bed – early start and 12 hour shift tomorrow – bleurgh!
Have a good one all, give me plenty to read over breakfast :D
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
@Rowdier Wench Jun 3rd, 2007 at 2:12 pm “Doh! I didn’t get a chance to vote! Good that he still got elected. I’m proud!!! Sorry ۞, that I didn’t get a chance to vote…”
.
RW, where are your reading glasses? PIGEON got elected, not our ۞!
.
RAmen again to attent readers, a rare species on June sundays.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Ooops!
Fixed.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Aaargh, the ۞ sign doesn’t show on my screen in my reply. Where’s that carrier pigeon?
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Ooooh, it’s the italics that made it disappear…
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Off to some MPFC now: still hours to go with those DVD’s!
.
RAmen to attent and less attent readers!
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
First it was the Midgit in the cage, then the cat in the box and now all of the most dedicated Pastafarians on the New Server thread with NO VISIBLE RECENT COMMENTS!
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
@Professor B♥♥ty Jun 3rd, 2007 at 2:02 pm
Don’t believe those Rice Crispie bastards. They talk a lot of shit.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
That’s for sure, ۞. Just this morning the Rice Crispies told me that the “RECENT COMMENTS” were never coming back. I REFUSE TO BELIEVE!!! IT’S NOT TRUE!!!
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
@ JB – Sorry – yes I am a less attentive reader today! Speed reading…oops. OK I will then get a chance to vote for ۞ which is fantastic! Enjoy MPFC!!!!
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
@ Bobby and everyone,
Haven’t been around for a while, but I was interested in Bobby’s post
“4)Individual Catch Pages. Once they click the ad, they’ll be brought to a page on the FSM site which will expand on the idea presented in the ad and slowly make the argument that they should convert to Pastafarianism. I need help with this.”
My question is about the goal here. Do we present the argument that they should convert to Pastafarianism because we actually want them to convert or is it to confuse them and bring them into an argumentative discussion, or to get more hits on the page, bring in more people in general or ???
The reason I ask is because it seems unlikely that they would actually convert, or do we records of Joh Wits and the like actually converting?
P.S. Good to see you guys.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
@bill Jun 3rd, 2007 at 2:53 pm “” Do we present the argument that they should convert to Pastafarianism because we actually want them to convert or is it to confuse them and bring them into an argumentative discussion, or to get more hits on the page, bring in more people in general or ???
The reason I ask is because it seems unlikely that they would actually convert, or do we records of Joh Wits and the like actually converting?”
.
There has been some debate about this, but personally I don’t believe in converting into Pastafarianism, but rather in offering “expression space” to people who don’t feel at ease with religion (theirs or someone else’s).
.
Good to have you back too.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
@Bill
Welcome back!
.
warningh to others: physicists nerd post heading your way, scroll now
.
You remember the discussion about relativity we had on the Ken Miller thread? Just to give you an update: the answer is Lorentz transformations! These govern how to determine the net velocity, in a very different way of course than the simple vector addition of classical mechanics. Unfortunately, according to the wikipedia article on it, the velocity is not the only thing anymore, the distance also becomes a factor. In case you’re interested:
.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lorentz_transformation
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
@DutchPastaGuy Jun 3rd, 2007 at 3:23 pm“You remember the discussion about relativity we had on the Ken Miller thread? Just to give you an update: the answer is Lorentz transformations! These govern how to determine the net velocity, in a very different way of course than the simple vector addition of classical mechanics. Unfortunately, according to the wikipedia article on it, the velocity is not the only thing anymore, the distance also becomes a factor.”
.
Now, if that isn’t going to answer Bill’s question about converting!
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
@ Bill – I am very glad to see your post!! Welcome back! I personally like the idea of encouraging people to come here and express their ideas – like JB said. “Converting” people sounds a bit too much like mainstream religion, which none of us like.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Ok, Beth, Booty we need to sit in a circle, hold hands and repeat:
.
The crispies aren’t talking to us, about us or to each other they are simply going snap crackle pop we can’t hear words in what they’re saying.
.
That’ll show the little rice based bastards what for!
.
They’re just saying that recent comments isn’t coming back to tease you. They have a very warped sense of humour.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
@DPG
Nerd aleat:
I thought the Lorentz transformation were just an ad hoc way of patching up the results of the michaelson/morley experiments. How else can you account for the speed of light rushing towards an object as being the same as the speed of light running away? We wouldn’t hold for that in baseball.
But there is a reason to hold distance as part of the calculation. Things much further away have the expanding universe to deal with. I believe that for something that is only receding at the speed of universe expansion and a distance away is in our time frame, even though it is moving away. So maybe Lorentz transformations was the way to go, before a real theory could be developed. IE Einstein’s special.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Haven’t been here in FOREVER!
Bobby needs to make a new thread to save me from the lag!
@bill
Are you the same bill I’m thinking about? You’re a teacher right? Haven’t talked to you in…
that’s right…
FOREVER!
I need to catch up a little I suppose.
RAmen
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
@ Pixely Dude – It’s harder to keep up around here without the Recent Comments section!
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
I miss my Recent Comments. :_(
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Can someone tell me how to do
Quotation marks
White posting box
That acronym thingy
Pleeease (:))
Too lazy to go look it all up on site program editing info!
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
XHTML?
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
It’s ok…over my laziness now (:)) I’ll look it up if I really feel the need to do it :)))
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Check it out. Someone has been messing with the Truth. This person has altered the Penguin article not once, but twice.
http://uncyclopedia.org/index.php?title=Penguin&diff=0&oldid=2039437
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
@۞, but, but the rice crispies are my friends, they are nice to me, it must be just yours that are mean, that must be it, no other possible reason, lalalalalalala.
.
.
Oh, and for what it’s worth, if we are in a room together I do not want to be just sitting in a circle holding hands, if you get my drift ;)
.
.
I want some bloody recent comments!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Bloody recent comments! I’ll even take ones that *aren’t* bloody! Nice clean ones would be fine! Dirty ones would be fine! Comments covered with Rice Crispies would be fine! Just make them RECENT COMMENTS!!!
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
I said something recently. No one cares though.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
@thesorgo
How was mass? Did your parents stick to their promise that you wouldn’t have to go to church anymore after this one?
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
@Wench Nikkiee Jun 3rd, 2007 at 12:36 pm
@Admiral Benbow Jun 3rd, 2007 at 4:36 am
“Yo ho ho!”
.
Great name link…..got a bit buried back there in this “recent commentgate” scandal (:))
.
Look back there Admiral Benbow….I saw it! Welcome to CoFSM if you are new.
We’re in the middle of a protest to get our site/server back to normal. :)))
Like or Dislike:
0 
0