I was tricked by Jehovah’s Witnessess!

I almost got shot. kinda.

A few days ago, as I was leaving my apartment, a car sped across the parking lot to intercept me. I had just about reached my car when I noticed the driver stopping directly behind my car, blocking me. The two passengers jumped out of the car and came straight at me.

I get a lot of hate-mail and I’ve had more than a few death threats. I keep my address a secret, but I’ve had people track me down in the past. So, when I saw a car speed up and two people jump out, it freaked me out.

One of them asked me if I valued the mind and body benefits of exercise. I said yes and that I needed to get going. They assured me that they’d move the car, but perhaps I wanted to take some reading material with me to look over when I had more time.

So I took their pamphlet. My only excuse is that I thought I was going to get stabbed or something, and I just wanted to get out of there. It wasn’t until later that I looked at the pamphlet. It slowly went from exercise to Jesus. It turned out to be disguised Jehovah’s Witness propaganda, the Watchtower. I figured that they tricked me fair and square, so I felt obligated to read it.

dsc_3542.jpgdsc_3546.jpg

What I learned by this experience

The pamphlet, itself, was kind of Jesusy. But it gave me some fantastic ideas for expanding the Pastafarian congregation. Clearly, the way to get more members is to trick them; make them think they’re signing up for one thing and then – bam – all the sudden you hit them with the gospel-speak, and you’ve got them.

So, I’ve decided that we’re going to do a similar campaign to trick people into joining FSM, specifically, members of other religions, especially the religions who propagandize. I figure that we’ve already got the open-minded people, now we need the gullible ones.

Internet advertising - like magic, but nerdier

You can target advertisements to specific categories of websites. We’re going to be targeting competing religious websites. Any religion who hands out pamphlets is fair game. Lots of religious websites sell ad-space through 3rd parties, and we’ll be able to place OUR ads on their pages, and steal their members.

It’ll work like this: their members will go to the church websites as usual, and they’ll see a small ad suggesting that there is more to their religion. Some of them will click the ad and be brought to a specific catch page, where they’ll hear fantastic arguments on why they should convert.

I need your help with any of the following:

1) Specific strategies for each religion. For example, for Jehovah’s Witnesses, we could push that we, also, reject Orthodox Christianity. And the strategies don’t need to be that on-topic. The Jehovah’s Witnesses got me with an exercise pamphlet, we could just as easily have a pirate angle or something. We’ll have different strategies for the other religions - Mormons, Young Earth Christians, Scientologists, etc. Let’s brainstorm. Either post in the comments or send me an email at bobby.henderson@gmail.com

2) Nich text ads. We need short, catchy text ads that will appeal to each of the target religions. The content of these ads will be more clear once we’ve established our strategies for each religion.

3) Small Image Ads. People with art skills, get creative. Same deal with the text ads, we’re going to know more once we know what our angle is. We’ll need ads in the following dimensions:
200×200
250×250
468×60
336×280

4)Individual Catch Pages. Once they click the ad, they’ll be brought to a page on the FSM site which will expand on the idea presented in the ad and slowly make the argument that they should convert to Pastafarianism. I need help with this.

5) Money. I’ve put aside a few thousand for this. Ads cost between $0.25 and upwards of $5 per thousand views. I’m hoping for a budget of at least $5k. If you want to help, you can either donate, or buy some FSM merchandise.

So, that’s my idea. What do you think?

473 Responses to “I was tricked by Jehovah’s Witnessess!”

Pages: « 15 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 12 1324 » Show All
  1. 161 - May 18th, 2007 at 8:17 am - pete Says:

    How did Noah get all the animals on the ark?

    Ample Carrying Capacity. The passenger list of the ark was quite impressive. Besides Noah, his wife, his three sons, and their wives, living creatures “of every sort of flesh, two of each,” were to be taken aboard. “Male and female they will be. Of the flying creatures according to their kinds and of the domestic animals according to their kinds, of all moving animals of the ground according to their kinds, two of each will go in there to you to preserve them alive.” Of the clean beasts and fowls, seven of each kind were to be taken. A great quantity and variety of food for all these creatures, to last for more than a year, also had to be stowed away.—Ge 6:18-21; 7:2, 3.

    The “kinds” of animals selected had reference to the clear-cut and unalterable boundaries or limits set by the Creator, within which boundaries creatures are capable of breeding “according to their kinds.” It has been estimated by some that the hundreds of thousands of species of animals today could be reduced to a comparatively few family “kinds”—the horse kind and the cow kind, to mention but two. The breeding boundaries according to “kind” established by Jehovah were not and could not be crossed. With this in mind some investigators have said that, had there been as few as 43 “kinds” of mammals, 74 “kinds” of birds, and 10 “kinds” of reptiles in the ark, they could have produced the variety of species known today. Others have been more liberal in estimating that 72 “kinds” of quadrupeds and less than 200 bird “kinds” were all that were required. That the great variety of animal life known today could have come from inbreeding within so few “kinds” following the Flood is proved by the endless variety of humankind—short, tall, fat, thin, with countless variations in the color of hair, eyes, and skin—all of whom sprang from the one family of Noah.

    These estimates may seem too restrictive to some, especially since such sources as The Encyclopedia Americana indicate that there are upwards of 1,300,000 species of animals. (1977, Vol. 1, pp. 859-873) However, over 60 percent of these are insects. Breaking these figures down further, of the 24,000 amphibians, reptiles, birds, and mammals, 10,000 are birds, 9,000 are reptiles and amphibians, many of which could have survived outside the ark, and only 5,000 are mammals, including whales and porpoises, which would have also remained outside the ark. Other researchers estimate that there are only about 290 species of land mammals larger than sheep and about 1,360 smaller than rats. (The Deluge Story in Stone, by B. C. Nelson, 1949, p. 156; The Flood in the Light of the Bible, Geology, and Archaeology, by A. M. Rehwinkel, 1957, p. 69) So, even if estimates are based on these expanded figures, the ark could easily have accommodated a pair of all these animals.

    Five months after the Deluge began, “the ark came to rest on the mountains of Ararat,” not likely, however, atop the uppermost peak (nearly 5,165 m; 16,950 ft), but on suitable terrain where everyone aboard lived comfortably for some months more. Finally, after a year and ten days from the time the Deluge began, the door again was opened and all aboard disembarked.—Ge 7:11; 8:4, 14.

  2. 162 - May 18th, 2007 at 8:21 am - Beastly Rich Says:

    Crazy? That god you believe in apparently made Neanderthals and all the monkey men we keep finding fossils of for a laugh apparently. What part of Natural selection don’t you understand?
    .
    or was that a joke?

  3. 163 - May 18th, 2007 at 8:23 am - pete Says:

    And here is a part about size and design of the ark - notice it was not a boat shap as they make out in kids books but was an ark or rectangle shap

    “1. Noah’s ark was the provision by which forefathers of all mankind survived the global Deluge of 2370-2369 B.C.E. (See DELUGE; NOAH No. 1.) Detailed instructions were given to Noah by Jehovah as to its size, shape, design for light and ventilation, and materials to be used for its construction.—Ge 6:14-16.

    Design and Size. The ark (Heb., te·vah′; Gr., ki·bo·tos′) was a rectangular chestlike vessel presumably having square corners and a flat bottom. It needed no rounded bottom or sharp bow to cut rapidly through the water; it required no steering; its only functions were to be watertight and to stay afloat. A vessel so shaped is very stable, cannot be easily capsized, and contains about one third more storage space than ships of conventional design. There was a door provided in the side of the ark for loading and unloading the cargo.

    In size the ark was 300 cubits long, 50 cubits wide, and 30 cubits high. Conservatively calculating the cubit as 44.5 cm (17.5 in.) (some think the ancient cubit was nearer 56 or 61 cm), the ark measured 133.5 m by 22.3 m by 13.4 m (437 ft 6 in. × 72 ft 11 in. × 43 ft 9 in.), less than half the length of the ocean liner Queen Elizabeth 2. This proportion of length to width (6 to 1) is used by modern naval architects. This gave the ark approximately 40,000 cu m (1,400,000 cu ft) in gross volume. It is estimated that such a vessel would have a displacement nearly equal to that of the mighty 269-m (883 ft) Titanic of this 20th century. No cargo vessel of ancient times even slightly resembled the ark in its colossal size. Internally strengthened by adding two floors, the three decks thus provided gave a total of about 8,900 sq m (96,000 sq ft) of space.

    “You will make a tso′har [roof; or, window] for the ark,” Noah was told. (Ge 6:16) Just what this was or how it was constructed is not altogether clear. Some scholars think tso′har is related to light and so they translate it “window” (KJ, Mo), “light” (AS, JP), “a place for light” (Ro). Others, however, associate tso′har with a later Arabic root meaning “back (of the hand),” “back (of a beast),” “deck (of a ship),” that is, the part away from the ground or water, and for this reason translate it “roof.” (AT, RS, JB) This tso′har, Noah was told, was to be completed “to the extent of a cubit upward.”—Ge 6:16.

    It could be, therefore, that the tso′har provided for adequate light and ventilation, not just a single cubit-square “peephole,” but an opening a cubit in height near the roof and extending around the four sides to give an opening of nearly 140 sq m (1,500 sq ft). On the other hand, while still allowing an ample opening for ventilation under the roof or elsewhere, the roof could have had slightly angled sides. Regarding this possibility James F. Armstrong wrote in Vetus Testamentum (Leiden, 1960, p. 333): “‘Unto a cubit upward you shall finish it’ is difficult to understand when sohar is translated either ‘light (= window)’ or even ‘(flat) roof’. If, however, a gable-type roof be postulated, the ‘one cubit upward’ can refer to the elevation of the crease of the roof above the level of the tops of the walls. In modern architectural terms, the ‘one cubit’ would be the height of the kingposts between which the ridgepiece is laid. . . . According to the argument that has been presented, the roof of Noah’s ark was conceived as having a four per-cent pitch (1 cubit elevation — 25 cubits from wall to ridge), quite adequate to permit the water of the rains to flow off.”

    Of what this huge ark was to be built was made plain by Jehovah: “Make for yourself an ark out of wood of a resinous tree [literally, trees of gopher].” (Ge 6:14) This resinous wood here prescribed is thought by some to be cypress or a similar tree. In that part of the world what today is called cypress was in abundant supply; it was particularly favored for shipbuilding by the Phoenicians and by Alexander the Great, as it is even down to the present time; and it is especially resistant to water and decay. Doors and posts made of cypress are reported to have lasted 1,100 years. In addition, Noah was told not merely to caulk the seams but to “cover [the ark] inside and outside with tar.”—See BITUMEN.”

  4. 164 - May 18th, 2007 at 8:25 am - Beastly Rich Says:

    How did Noah get all the animals on the ark?
    Do you think it would be hard for God to do. God who made the earth just the right size and the sun just the right distance from the earth to make life possible.
    .
    Why did he make trillions of lifeless planets then? Anyone who gives it a moments thought can see the huge hole in this kind of thinking. Life happened on this planet only because is the right size and distance from the sun.

  5. 165 - May 18th, 2007 at 8:27 am - pete Says:

    Beastly Rich May 18th, 2007 at 8:21 am

    “Crazy? That god you believe in apparently made Neanderthals and all the monkey men we keep finding fossils of for a laugh apparently.”

    What fossils? they find fossils of monkeys - and sometimes old human fossils - not Neanderthals - we only have artist drawings of them

    Remember Piltdown man? - the evolution community said that was with out doubt fact - until it was shown to be a hoax

  6. 166 - May 18th, 2007 at 8:27 am - Professor B♥♥ty Says:

    Didn’t have many windows, did it?
    ANd how the hell did he feed them all and stop them eating each other?
    Glad to see you are here, Beastly, hold the fort for me - I am off playing building castles of weeds with the boys - odd, but there you go!
    Do you thnk Pete is for real?

  7. 167 - May 18th, 2007 at 8:29 am - pete Says:

    Piltdown man

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piltdown_Man

    “The Piltdown hoax is perhaps the most famous archaeological hoax in history. It has been prominent for two reasons: the attention paid to the issue of human evolution, and the length of time (more than 40 years) that elapsed from its discovery to its exposure as a forgery.”

    40 years they used that to say eveolution was a fact - what about the rubbish they have today

  8. 168 - May 18th, 2007 at 8:31 am - Beastly Rich Says:

    How long and boring. I can’t be bothered to check that, unfortunately I very much doubt that any ship could be made from wood (or anything we have for that matter) to be sea worthy and carry all the animals and food.
    .
    Don’t you think it’s strange how all the marsupials ended up in auz, which also happens to be the only place where fossil marsupials are found?

  9. 169 - May 18th, 2007 at 8:33 am - pete Says:

    so you believe in little green men now? See you can say I am crazy for believing in a God but what about you believing in aliens (I guess you do as most evolutionists do) - sounds crazy to me - what kind of reasoning is this?

    I think we must agree to disagree as this converstation is going nowhere. But I’m sure you will have a nice chat with a JW the next time they come around. I must go now.

  10. 170 - May 18th, 2007 at 8:34 am - Beastly Rich Says:

    Was piltdown man descovered as a hoax by a biblical study or by real science?

    Do you understand what a Neanderthal is?
    .
    It’s not the same as a man.

  11. 171 - May 18th, 2007 at 8:36 am - Beastly Rich Says:

    so you believe in little green men now?
    .
    No. I think it’s a possibility but I’m a sticker for proof you see.

  12. 172 - May 18th, 2007 at 8:41 am - pete Says:

    Beastly Rich May 18th, 2007 at 8:34 am

    “Was piltdown man descovered as a hoax by a biblical study or by real science?

    Do you understand what a Neanderthal is?
    .
    It’s not the same as a man.”

    Like I said - It was accepted by the evolution community for 40 years as fact that we evolved from monkeys or Neanderthal as you like to say. But was exposed as a forgery, a hoax.

    It just shows if they used that as proof what does it say about eveolution?

    read up on it http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piltdown_Man

    now i must really go - thanks

  13. 173 - May 18th, 2007 at 8:43 am - pete Says:

    real scientists discovered it as a hoax - nothing to do with any religion

  14. 174 - May 18th, 2007 at 8:43 am - Professor B♥♥ty Says:

    Ooh - don’t go Pete - I keep dashing in from playing with the boys

  15. 175 - May 18th, 2007 at 8:44 am - Professor B♥♥ty Says:

    Do you have a background in science? You are very knowledgable.
    We don’t get much of that here :(

  16. 176 - May 18th, 2007 at 8:52 am - Beastly Rich Says:

    Piltdown was just a single fossil from one location that couldn’t stand up to carbon dating, we have a large collection of Neanderthal bits from a lot of places, all carbon dated right by lot’s of different institutions. A huge body of evidence.
    .
    God has nothing.

  17. 177 - May 18th, 2007 at 8:54 am - Professor B♥♥ty Says:

    Hey, don’t forget the graph, Beastly!

  18. 178 - May 18th, 2007 at 9:01 am - Beastly Rich Says:

    oh, yeah that.
    .
    :( pete didn’t answer a load of my question

  19. 179 - May 18th, 2007 at 9:17 am - Ping Pong Dang, last descendant of the Thong Dynasty Says:

    @All Wenches and Pirates
    .
    I can’t believe Pete is a real fundie, but he’s fun. Go on, Pete, show us some ID “science”! It’s great to see the holes, gaps and abysses in Creationism exposed by a Creationist, be he/she real or fake! Pete could learn a lot from www.uncyclopedia.org/wiki/The_Thong_Dynasty , by the way: now that’s History!
    .
    WSWP to all, RAmen, and keep going with the good stuff!

  20. 180 - May 18th, 2007 at 9:26 am - Beastly Rich Says:

    I think he’s an imposter of the JW pete

Pages: « 15 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 12 1324 » Show All

Leave a Reply

Connect with other Pastafarians

Recent Comments

Propaganda Buttons

Add these buttons to your site:



Contribute

The Church of the FSM is looking for content. Details here

Support the Cause

The Church is funded entirely by your purchases of FSM merchandise. Thank you for your support.

Purchase the Gospel

An elaborate spoof on Intelligent Design, The Gospel of the Flying Spaghetti Monster is neither too elaborate nor too spoofy to succeed in nailing the fallacies of ID. It's even wackier than Jonathan Swift's suggestion that the Irish eat their children as a way to keep them from being a burden, and it may offend just as many people, but Henderson, described elsewhere as a 25-year-old "out-of-work physics major," puts satire to the same serious use that Swift did. Oh, yes, it is very funny. -- Scientific American

Misc.

Bobby's Personal Blog

Contact Bobby: Contact Me


Website monitor by Killerwebstats.com

 

Support the Arts:

Fine art taco photography


Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 License. This means you're free to use the content but not sell it. More Details