I’ve read some of the posts that you pea brained losers have come up with as to available scientific data and you are just full of shit. You obviously haven’t read anything by William Dembski and fail to consider the abundance of evidence as to ID being as valid a scientific theory as evolution.
http://www.idnet.com.au/files/pdf/Message%20theory.PDF
According to your own press you believe that the universe was created by spagetti which is a theory of ID anyway. ID makes no claim as to what intelligence created humanity and the world although most sensible people know this to be God. Moreover, Atheists fail to consider such abundance of evidence such as stigmata, appearance of the virgin at Fattima and other occurances reported by relyable witnesses. Since when is it that only a scientist is able to make and record an observation? Scientists are more biased then anyone closing off their minds to any possibility of divinity.
You should all just get fucked!
Wolf






















your message amuses me, that’s all, you are trying to offend us, which will not work, we deal with stupid christians every day, you are no exception
there is no proof at all for the ID theory, DNA is similar, so?
the real scientific explanation is that we all come from the same thing, not god, but one-celled creatures which form colonies, god is not responsible for our existence, it’s coincidence and DNA,
and the FSM ofcourse
RAmen
Like or Dislike:
0
0
I love it when science and god come together, here’s my id theory.
if god exists (laughable), then the bible claims he made us in his own image.
in the beginning of evolutionary theory, the first organism was a single celled amoeba.
Creationism and evolution have now shown in unison that god is therefore an amoeba, and we have evolved beyond him.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
A 2 page document written by someone whose agenda involves debunking the theory of evolution and “proving” ID is science does not overrule the piles of fossil and geological evidence.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
“Moreover, Atheists fail to consider such abundance of evidence such as stigmata, appearance of the virgin at Fattima and other occurances reported by relyable witnesses. Since when is it that only a scientist is able to make and record an observation?”
1.) Eye witness are not reliable evidence.
2.) Scientists carefully record their data and findings in such a fashion that other scientists can recreate the experiment and physically recreate the observations.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
I find it a bit sad that Mr. or Ms. Wolf does not even bat an eye, when he says that CoFSM has an ID theme. I mean, who knows, scientific evidence may have all been planted by the FSM to raise doubt and weed out non-believers. You know, the same reason the FSM invented god and jesus – to test the faithful.
.
No one is saying all american are smart, but there is a scary number of americans that are pretty dim on a good day with lots of rest.
.
damn, I got to get out of this country.
.
Arr, time to claim and island for myself.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
I don’t understand why christians refuse to read their own bible if they’re so religous or w/e they say… Doesn’t it say something about respect other people even if they have different values / beliefs?
If you’re so sure in yourselves that god is real and that you will go to heaven why do you feel the urge to get on this site and abuse us? If you were really so sure you would stop pushing your values on us when you know it will only aggravate us do you think you can make us all suddenly change our minds?
Furthermore i’d like to add that stigmata is caused by humans not god their is no evidence that stigmata is caused by god there has been no confirmed case of stigmata since 1938 or w/e i forget and even that doesn’t count because it has not been under the scope of reasonable scientific scrutiny
Like or Dislike:
0
0
hope that guy aint christian coz there is no proof no scientific proof of any god like person or jesus for that matter…but ach well tis best saved for another day
Like or Dislike:
0
0
>Moreover, Atheists fail to consider such abundance of evidence such as stigmata
Like or Dislike:
0
0
Oops, there is something missing! Again:
>Moreover, Atheists fail to consider such abundance of evidence such as stigmata
Like or Dislike:
0
0
Arrgh! Should learn some HTML…
“Moreover, Atheists fail to consider such abundance of evidence such as stigmata”
No, we don’t!
Here is our recommendation how to get stigmatized:
1. Take a Ferrero Mon Cheri praline (European style, with liquor and a cherry inside).
2. Make a fist and let it melt.
3. Show your hands to the public from some distance.
4. Cover your hands in bondages from that day on.
(Suggested by the German satire magazine Titanic.)
Like or Dislike:
0
0
May be it’s “bandage”, sorry.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
“According to your own press you believe that the universe was created by spagetti which is a theory of ID anyway.” – I had no idea that Creationist believed that the universe was made by spaghetti.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
Mary wasnt a virgin, she got raped and sayd insted that “god” had blessed her with his son*
*ps. i ment daughter, sory about cofusion
Like or Dislike:
0
0
Believe you have to consider all aspects in the current economic climate – personally do no think we have seen the full extent of the recesssion, so would be cautious in considering.
Like or Dislike:
0
0