I usually dont review pages I disagree with

Published November 12th, 2006 by Bobby Henderson

I usually don’t review pages I disagree with, but I’ve stumbled this page a few times now… If methodological naturalism is to be used unwaveringly in science (which has not always been the case), then it renders the discipline potentially impotent to answer fundamental questions that it might otherwise provide insight on. Acknowledging that there are certain situations in which data may be interpreted in ways that at least suggest alternatives to ontological naturalism seems like the kind of thing that might increase interest in science. Specific ID models (if they’re to be presented at all) must only be considered based on their merits with respect to the data and their explanatory power (thus excluding young-earth creationism and FSM).

-zxczxcv



162 Responses to “I usually dont review pages I disagree with”

1 13 14 15 16 17 21
  1. Gnocci Man says:

    @ Bobby’s last reply

    .-.
    ! !
    ! !
    ()()! !()
    ! ! ! ! !( )
    \ / /
    \ /
    ! !

    ENOUGH ALREADY! MUST YOU CONTINUALLY POST THIS REPULSIVE AND FANATICAL PROPAGANDA ON OUR SITE?

  2. Gnocci Man says:

    ***..-.
    ***.!.!
    ***.!.!
    ()-()!.!-()
    !.!..!..!..!(-)
    *\………/./
    **\……../
    ***!…..!

    Sorry, I forgot about the space deletion

  3. Gnocci Man says:

    hmmm…. that’s harder to do than it looks.
    anyway, it was meant to be a middle finger.
    RAmen

  4. One Oared Marc (formally Marcus Marinara) says:

    It looks like one of His sacred oars.

  5. Homo narrans says:

    i dunno, i don’t think that’s a bad depiction of a mid-finger…call it post-impressionistic. ;-)

  6. '99 says:

    @Gnocci Man
    ENOUGH ALREADY! MUST YOU CONTINUALLY POST THIS REPULSIVE AND FANATICAL PROPAGANDA ON OUR SITE?
    .
    I think BLR has a yearning to be famous and gets off on seeing her monika all over the threads.

  7. One Oared Marc says:

    Monika? Monika Lewinski? I am sure that there is a poem in here somewhere…

  8. That dude under your bed says:

    JARGON IS BAD KIDS. Seriously, that looked like you just took microsoft thesarus to it. If a simple word suffices why use a big word like “suffice” instead of “work?” By the way, this is a satiricle and mostly sarcastic way to get our points across to get rid of creationism in schools

1 13 14 15 16 17 21

Leave a Reply