If I were to shoot your wife, would you have a problem with that?
-michael martin
If I were to shoot your wife, would you have a problem with that?
-michael martin
|
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 License. This means you're free to use the content but not sell it. More Details |
Flimsy is not the same thing as non-existant, and if you shot my (hypothetical) wife what exactly would that say about your moral standards?
The good ol’ “I’d be a homicidal maniac if it weren’t for gawd”-line of reasoning… Fortunately, the FSM gave most of us rationally minded folks the mental capacity to establish baseline moral standards that can stand on their own outside of our faith.
Shooting wives is wrong in most cases, irregardless of what the FSM thinks.
My (also hypothetical) wife is protected by the flying spaghetti monster, so I would say nothing.
My moral standards would say that if you shot my (hypothetical) wife, you’d be put in jail for a LOOOOOOONNG time.
Flimsy morals don’t mean we don’t HAVE morals, which is obviosly your case since you even suggested such an awfull thing. Flimsy morals mean we like drinking, partying, mabye a little debochary on the side and breaking those stupid firework regulations.
I’m underaged and sadly canot have a wife… :(. But hypothetically let’s say I do, if you shoot my wife, I’d shoot your wife. You insult my religion, I insult your religion.
Priests touch little boys!
RAmen
The good Doktor gets his own thread. This should be interesting.
Normally I try to be polite. But you are a sick freak. What type of person even suggests such a thing? If you are this violent in your beliefs, perhaps you ought to consider a tour of duty in the military? Whatever the case, don’t post on religous websites, even satrical ones.
@ OOM- this WON’T be interesting. He’s an egotistic little spud who like copying and pasting.
come on guys he just doesn’t understand the difference between flimsy and non existent. in christianity you only get black and white which is fitting as God is both flimsy and non existent
@poster. Nice argument. I don’t have a wife. If you tried to shoot one of my loved ones (be they ex-girlfriends, my parents or my dog) I would quite happily try to stop you.
.
Are you still taking the meds? Tell your doc. that you are having naughty thoughts - s/he
will increase your dose.
.
I would appreciate you not shooting my wife. I need to go first so I can hit the beer volcano and swing by the stripper factory before she hooks up with me.
RAmen
i love it how people say that without god they would be fucked. i think most of the people in the world who have god are already fucked. just look at the middle east and the south. not much peace with terrorists, racists, and ignorant dumbasses.
If you were to shoot my wife I would be glad because that would signify that i actually managed to get a wife in the first place.
And also, she would be protected by a wall of holy noodly appendages so the bullet would do nothing anyway.
Whats all this talk of wives anyway, who needs one? (or a husband for that matter) marriage is one of the god squad rituals it should make no difference to rational minds.
thats what my parrot says anyway
Welcome back Doc. Got bored without us, eh? You must like this site, I wonder why.
If you were an atheist, you would have other (more rational) reasons for behaving the way you behave today (and thus NOT shooting anyone - unless you’re a complete psycho which I would not totally exclude). There are very profane reasons why people do what they do. The God illusion just saves them from having to think about their real reasons.
May you be touched by His Noodly Appendage.
“If I were to shoot your wife”
.
You’d go to your hell.
.
Very, very quickly.
“If I were to shoot your wife”
I’d tear out your left anterior descending artery.
Cheers.
Yeah, issant murder one of those commandment thingies?
That was sarcasm, by the way I know for a fact it’s one.
“If I were to shoot your wife, would you have a problem with that?”
.
I would really love to see the original context of this statement. I’ve followed some of DMM’s posts, but they have been too numerous to read them all. I don’t recall this statement.
.
Anyone have a link to the original post?