 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Basic Straw-man Fallacy… They put up this stupid straw-man that nobody in their right mind would believe in(Pastafarian Religon) and then falliciously equate it to a real belief(Intelligent Design) that is supported by many scientists, in an attempt to refute that belief.
-vashsunglasses
The Church of the FSM is always looking for content. Details here
The Church is funded entirely by your purchases of FSM merchandise. Thank you for your support.
An elaborate spoof on Intelligent Design, The Gospel of the Flying Spaghetti Monster is neither too elaborate nor too spoofy to succeed in nailing the fallacies of ID. It's even wackier than Jonathan Swift's suggestion that the Irish eat their children as a way to keep them from being a burden, and it may offend just as many people, but Henderson, described elsewhere as a 25-year-old "out-of-work physics major," puts satire to the same serious use that Swift did. Oh, yes, it is very funny. -- Scientific American
Purchase from Amazon.com
Add these buttons to your site:
Bobby's Blog
Contact Bobby: Contact Me
 |
 |
Hi, I can
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
As a Newbie, I am always searching online for articles that can help me. Thank you
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
It is a classic straw-man fallacy. Rational & philosophically educated Atheists like Quinten Smith would never use it. It’s only the simple-minded followers of Dawkins & Hitchens who think the FSM is somehow a rational critique of the existence or non-existence of an Uncaused Cause.
Atheists who use this “argument” are in the same class as the followers of Richard Comfort who use the “Bannana Argument” for the existence of God. Only half as smart.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0