Spaghetti and pasta didn’t exist till the 500-900AD

Problem, Spaghetti and pasta didn’t exist till the 500 - 900 AD. Google it knucklehead. Funny, yet it still does not address the problem of irreducible complexity. Too bad :( He missed the whole point.

-LeapofFaith

228 Responses to “Spaghetti and pasta didn't exist till the 500-900AD”


  1. 1 Penne Nov 15th, 2006 at 1:10 pm

    That’s just what they want you to think.

  2. 2 Aldous Nov 15th, 2006 at 1:19 pm

    There is nothing such as irreducible complexity. What is irreducible is your ignorance.
    Anyway, pasta does exist. Your God doesn’t. Too bad. :(
    By the way, you missed the whole point.
    RAmen

  3. 3 J Nov 15th, 2006 at 1:22 pm

    Leap of Faith is wrong, wrong, wrong. I think Jingles, OEJ or Davey has the link to the VERY old noodles..

  4. 4 J Nov 15th, 2006 at 1:24 pm

    Well, that was easy to re-find:
    .
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/4335160.stm
    .
    ‘Google it knucklehead.’ Just did, arse-for-brains.

  5. 5 Dr. Kilgore Nov 15th, 2006 at 1:26 pm

    While it may be true that pasta didn’t exist until 500-900 A.D. the FSM is not actually made of pasta, He just resembles it, or rather pasta resembles Him.

    Oh ye of little faith, fear not for the almighty FSM shall not smite you for your ignorance.

  6. 6 Homo narrans Nov 15th, 2006 at 1:26 pm

    As this site mentions many times, the FSM created pasta in his image, not the other way around.

    And just to agree with Aldous here, irreducible complexity really is a myth. every smokescreen the ID advocates have put up has been swept away as we increase our understanding of evolutionary process. the human eye? the bombardier beetle? the bacterial flagelluem? read some up-to-date journals, “knucklehead”.

  7. 7 Penne Nov 15th, 2006 at 1:29 pm

    -Dr. Kilgore: What?????No smiting?Why the sauce not?

  8. 8 Mad John Kidd Nov 15th, 2006 at 1:30 pm

    Leapoffaith is a bit vague, don’t you think. You are referring to the earliest known evidence. Who is to say that there is not an older plate of fossilized noodles just waiting to be discovered? And simply mentioning the problem of irreducible complexity is hardly a refutation…sheesh.

  9. 9 J Nov 15th, 2006 at 1:30 pm

    Oh, and ‘the problem of irreducible complexity’ is that even the guy who coined the phrase ‘irreducible complexity’, Michael J. Behe, has been forced to backtrack, so thoroughly has the idea been debunked:
    .
    ‘Behe has confessed to “sloppy prose” and said he hadn’t meant to imply that irreducibly complex systems “by definition” cannot evolve gradually. “I quite agree that my argument against Darwinism does not add up to a logical proof,” he says’
    .
    The quote is from this link, which has appeared on this site many times, now:
    http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/articles/050530fa_fact

  10. 10 Grrraham Nov 15th, 2006 at 1:32 pm

    When writing dates, the “AD” comes before the year, not after, as you’ve written. (AD 900, for example, is correct.) Therefore, everything you’ve written is wrong. Q.E.D.

  11. 11 Mad John Kidd Nov 15th, 2006 at 1:34 pm

    @ J

    Nice one about Behe.

  12. 12 Fr. Corpus Callosum Nov 15th, 2006 at 1:39 pm

    I agree with Aldous:
    There is no such thing as irreducible complexity, just irreducible fundamentalist ignorance. Imagine someone so dumb that they have to Google-search ’spaghetti’ to learn that it wasn’t always around.
    Oh wait a second, we don’t have to imagine that someone, we have -LeapofFaith right before our eyes.
    No -LeapofFaith is required at all!

  13. 13 Fr. Corpus Callosum Nov 15th, 2006 at 1:43 pm

    J: Thanks for the link. As always you are a font of knowledge.

  14. 14 J Nov 15th, 2006 at 1:50 pm

    (@FCC - Ta, but nope: Jingles, OEJ, Davey, nikkiee and the rest of you keep firing the knowledge off. It just ricochets off me and ends up with other people)

  15. 15 J Nov 15th, 2006 at 1:52 pm

    FCC.
    .
    ‘Imagine someone so dumb that they have to Google-search ’spaghetti’ to learn that it wasn’t always around.’
    .
    Cough, mumble - of course, *we* know better than Google on this, all praise the FSM, RAmen…

  16. 16 Brother Boyardee Nov 15th, 2006 at 1:53 pm

    > Spaghetti and pasta didn’t exist till the 500 - 900 AD.
    > -LeapofFaith
    .
    Are you suggesting the world is only 1500 years old?
    .
    - Brother Boyardee

  17. 17 jesus christ Nov 15th, 2006 at 2:18 pm

    this guy actually buys into the irreducible complexity bullshit! it may sound locigal (notice how i said sound), but it just another bullshit excuse to say “oh my god, this has to prove evolution wrong’. Behe is just 1 out 10 non-scientists to actually waste their time on intelligent design. just like every other ID non-scientist, he is really a strong christian trying to use the weapon of science to destroy science. all his other non-scientists work at a right-wing non-science organization with a completely unscientific and unoriginal name. (i think you guys know it)

  18. 18 Penne Nov 15th, 2006 at 2:27 pm

    Here,not quite as funny as ‘irreducible complexity’ but I’ve got a turkey in the oven so I thought I’d leave some for you guys http://www.netscape.com/viewstory/2006/11/15/just-a-bit-of-thanksgiving-humor/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.cyber-kitchen.com%2Fholidays%2Fthanksgiving%2Fhumor.htm&frame=true

  19. 19 Penne Nov 15th, 2006 at 2:28 pm

    P.S.,don’t puke it up on the carpet.

  20. 20 Nowtheworldhasmeaning Nov 15th, 2006 at 2:51 pm

    You Moron everyone knows that Noodles where around for at least 4000years
    .
    “They discovered 4,000-year-old long, boiled strands of noodles protected by an upside-down bowl, embedded in a fine, brownish-yellow clay on a terrace of the Yellow River at Lajia, north-western China. ”
    .
    Taken from this website http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200510/s1481004.htm
    and another site
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/4335160.stm (pictures of our great noodlie heratage)
    .
    You fucking Christians and you time scale, first you think the world is only 6000 years old and now you have no idea how long noodles have been around for. It is also very likely that noodles are much older than those found.
    .
    As you can see it is very likely that these noodles pre-date your monotheism (monotheism being the one true God). So who is the “knucklehead” Now?

  21. 21 tom Nov 15th, 2006 at 3:01 pm

    for two thousand years we did not see the moons of jupiter, yet there they were the whole time.

    -galileo, bertolt brecht

  22. 22 captain yar Nov 15th, 2006 at 3:04 pm

    yeah, noodles were invented thousands of years ago, and pirates worshiped them. yar

  23. 23 Beastly Rich Nov 15th, 2006 at 3:25 pm

    He created noodles in his divine image, not the other way around which is proven by FSM being around since the dawn of time, unlike noodles. The ancient Chinese noodles (which are only 2000 years old by the way, FSM fiddled the results as always to fit his divine plan) are proof of this.

  24. 24 AngelhairedAngie Nov 15th, 2006 at 3:35 pm

    pirates were carnivorous.
    they didnt eat pasta
    so they worshipped it
    yes,
    yar, indeed.

  25. 25 nikkiee Nov 15th, 2006 at 4:15 pm

    @-LeapofFaith
    ‘Too bad :( He missed the whole point.’
    hahaha……….priceless1

  26. 26 Tom Cruisey Nov 15th, 2006 at 5:13 pm

    Scientologists, take heart. Where you have been told that Xenu was evil, and that Thetans are a problem, hearken! We believe that L. Ron saw a lot of really true stuff. But he was just a little bit wrong about Xenu. Xenu is our leader. And Thetans are here to help, not to hurt.
    Thetans are your best friends. Establishing a relationship with your Thetans is our main goal. It is because we believe that the Thetans are purposeful and positive. L. Ron got that part all wrong.
    Xenu loves us. Xenu wants the best for us all. L. Ron identified Xenu as a master leader, and all Xenuists are forever indebted to L. Ron for that, but the Thetans are not our enemies, no matter what they tell you. Embrace your Thetans. Actually, the more Thetans you have, the better off you will be once you learn to co-exist with them.

  27. 27 J Nov 15th, 2006 at 5:16 pm

    Regarding Tom Cruisey
    .
    I spoke to soon. Throw shit at one thread, I guess it spatters…

  28. 28 Jon888 Nov 15th, 2006 at 5:18 pm

    The worldest oldest noodle is actually older than the earth itself. We know the carbon dating is wrong because the Flying Spaghetti Monster changed the results to give the illusion that the noodle is only 5000 years old (which is about 1000 years younger than earth).

  29. 29 Alchemist Nov 15th, 2006 at 5:25 pm

    Tom - sorry mate I got it wrong. I always thought that Thetan was the planet that was ruled by Xena, Warrior Princess. Whose brother Xeno had a very fast pet tortoise that ate rabbits and practiced archery.
    .
    Ho hum

  30. 30 Some random person Nov 15th, 2006 at 5:40 pm

    Pasta was sent to earth by the FSM after he decided we need to have a tasty dinner that resembles Him! That obviously, according to you, happened around 500-900AD. If you dont believe it, prove it wrong :D. remember, any evidence you have can be changed at will by the FSM.

  31. 31 Anna Nov 15th, 2006 at 5:50 pm

    Xena rocks! Xenu is obviously her little brother who felt he had to prove something to mom and dad, so he went and started his own religion! Bet that showed her.^_^

  32. 32 Alchemist Nov 15th, 2006 at 6:04 pm

    Hell Anna, now I’m stuck trying to remember Xena’s friend’s name - not Hercules, the strawberry blond. Looks like a wiki break.

  33. 33 Alchemist Nov 15th, 2006 at 6:05 pm

    Gabrielle

  34. 34 Fr. Corpus Callosum Nov 15th, 2006 at 6:22 pm

    Xena, Gabrielle, and Hercules remind me of a winter I took off, getting stoned and watching daytime TV. I also ate a lot of ramen that winter. Ah, those were the days! Even in my spiritually ignorant state, the FSM was drawing me towards him with his noodly appendages and flimsy morals.
    RAmen!

  35. 35 Thank God im an Atheist Nov 15th, 2006 at 6:38 pm

    you notice how quick J was able to stomp on leapoffaiths arguement….wait..wait..you hear that?….its leapoffaiths confidence squishing..aaaa what a sweet sound

  36. 36 SaucyWench Nov 15th, 2006 at 6:41 pm

    I once had a boyfriend who thought Gabrielle was a really hot lesbian. We had difficulty watching that show, yet we seemed to watch it more often that you’d think.

  37. 37 Nowtheworldhasmeaning Nov 15th, 2006 at 6:42 pm

    Guys if Tom Cruisey comes back direct him to the ” They’re people too” thread he maybe more willing to join if he reads that.

  38. 38 Thank God im an Atheist Nov 15th, 2006 at 6:47 pm

    can someone tell me if mad john kidd is from birmingham uk……prefurably him

  39. 39 Maxwell Nov 15th, 2006 at 6:55 pm

    If Tom Cruisey comes back, I’d be happy to direct him into traffic.

  40. 40 One Eyed Jack Nov 15th, 2006 at 7:08 pm

    Xena was alright, but a bit too pushy. Gabrielle had that innocent, unspoiled sort of thing going for her, but I’m all about the bad girl. Give me Calisto.
    .
    OEJ

  41. 41 Alchemist Nov 15th, 2006 at 7:32 pm

    OEJ I liked Gabrielle, but she had nothing on Willow from Buffy or Fred from Angel (or Susie Dent from Countdown _UK only)

  42. 42 Ink Nov 15th, 2006 at 7:40 pm

    For further information regarding “Irreducible Complexity”, as you so ignorantly phrase it, I refer you to Richard Dawkins “Climbing Mount Improbable”

    Here, I’ll even give you a useful link to the Amazon page so you can order it.
    http://www.amazon.com/Climbing-Mount-Improbable-Richard-Dawkins/dp/0393316823

    Please, learn about the subject that you are trying to debunk, otherwise it merely serves as a testament to your own ignorance.

    RAmen
    -Ink-

  43. 43 One Eyed Jack Nov 15th, 2006 at 7:44 pm

    I’m with you on Fred there. She was a little tramp though. One minute she’s all over Gunn. Then it’s Wesley. Then she morphs into that tough Goddess-chick. Smite me baby.
    .
    OEJ

  44. 44 Alchemist Nov 15th, 2006 at 7:53 pm

    Wesley was her first love tho’ - English with chicken legs. My reality, please don’t spoil it with such things as sense. Gun was a nice guy but far to muscular for her. I really need to get out more.

  45. 45 PastaServer134 Nov 15th, 2006 at 8:12 pm

    See the video of Dawkins answering questions at Lynchburg posted at
    http://richarddawkins.net/home
    It’s great! (Of course, the FSM gets in.)

  46. 46 nikkiee Nov 15th, 2006 at 8:28 pm

    Just to confuse the pscho scientologist spammers

  47. 47 HipsterKing Nov 15th, 2006 at 9:16 pm

    @leapoffaith- Yes, this may be true, but the whole basis of Christianity today was compiled by the Roman Emperor Constantine- rather arbitrarily I might add- centuries after the beginning of time according to the Bible, until then none of the earlier versions of this text were as complete, due to Constantine’s incorporation of pagan and otherwise gentile rituals and stories. And besides, there is no such thing as irreducible complexity. The FSM is indeed complex, but he is comprised of things that can function on their without being combined.

  48. 48 PastaServer134 Nov 15th, 2006 at 9:50 pm
  49. 49 Mad John Kidd Nov 15th, 2006 at 11:32 pm

    @ Thank God in an Atheist…

    .

    No, I’m a northern lad from Salford, Manchester, mate.

  50. 50 Sage Nov 16th, 2006 at 8:15 am

    This is a joke. I once thought I knew just how foolish people could be… but no, there is no end to it. Anyone who believes this must be mentally ill. There is no logic in this at all. Such ignorance will cause this world to go mad.
    Fools…

  51. 51 Aldous Nov 16th, 2006 at 8:59 am

    Sage, that’s not a very nice thing to say about religious people. You’re right though, ignorance HAS caused the world to go mad for 2000 years.
    May His Noodly Appendage lead us to eternal sanity.

  52. 52 Nowtheworldhasmeaning Nov 16th, 2006 at 9:58 am

    Sage I am wondering do you think the same thing about Christianity? or the belief in any type of Supreme natural beings?
    .
    If you do then fair enough, if not then where is your logic?

  53. 53 J Nov 16th, 2006 at 10:15 am

    ‘Such ignorance will cause this world to go mad.’
    .
    Oooh, the power, the *power*!

  54. 54 Penne Nov 16th, 2006 at 10:18 am

    -Anna,Is that why Xena ended up killing the Gods by the end of the show?

  55. 55 Gnocci Man Nov 16th, 2006 at 11:35 am

    Freinds, let me let you in on a little secret:

    There is no such thing as sanity. Never has been.

    RAmen

  56. 56 Y'aaaaaaarrdvark Nov 16th, 2006 at 12:02 pm

    Has anyone noticed that the spaghetti was found in the region of the Great Wall…
    .
    It is a sign! His Noodliness put it there so someone would find it, therefore giving more proof to the existence of Him and all he stands for (everything that is good) and therefore He could touch more with His Noodly Appendage!!!!!!!!!!!

  57. 57 Y'aaaaaaarrdvark Nov 16th, 2006 at 12:02 pm

    Whoops, I forgot to add that it was found in the region of the Great Wall, one of the many testimonies to Him! (Consult the Gospel if you are confused)

  58. 58 Pasta Parmesan Nov 16th, 2006 at 2:01 pm

    leapoffaith and all others who subscribe to ‘irreducible complexity’ are totally ignorant of the processes of evolution, and the nature of the fossil record, and even current biology of the planet. Take, for example, eyes. A firm favourite of such people, the argument runs that there is no such thing as 1/2 an eye… WRONG! Eyes range from primitive light/dark detectors as used by some insects and microscopic organisms, through to our eyes with rods and cones for detecting and interpreting colour. As for the fossil record, eyes tend to be soft material and decompose rapidly, leaving no trace, so impossible to tell exactly how advanced they were or what their capability may have been.

    By the way.. ‘Bones’ on TV last night had an episode devoted to Pirates… Yar!
    RAmen

  59. 59 Uomo Felice Della Pasta Nov 16th, 2006 at 2:11 pm

    @J:
    “Just did, arse-for-brains”
    Your comment containing this quote was, let us say, a bit less like an essay than your usual posts but just as effective.

  60. 60 Kite Nov 16th, 2006 at 2:15 pm

    Seems like theres nothing left to say, since the poor boy’s soul has been extracted through his nose by the FSM’s noodly appendage.
    .
    Praise the pasta, and pass the Parmesan.
    .
    May the sauce be with you.
    .
    RAmen.

  61. 61 Homo narrans Nov 16th, 2006 at 2:17 pm

    @ Pasta Parmesan: One of the arguments of ID founder Behe is that the evolutionists’ “give me the cell and i’ll give you the eye” notion is unacceptable because a photosensitive cell is 90% of the way to an eye in itself. what he gets at is that Cells are themselves far too complex to have arisen by darwinian natural selection.

    of course, this is also bullshit. irreducable complexity can be attained through darwinian evolution through the development of new cellular components and the loss of older/less-efficient components. but some people will cling to their outdated assertions no matter what.

  62. 62 Kite ( Assclownius Maximus ) Nov 16th, 2006 at 2:22 pm

    It wouldn’t make sense to evolve your opinion while speaking against evolution.

  63. 63 Davey the Pirate Assclown Nov 16th, 2006 at 2:25 pm

    The novelist Iain Banks wrote a letter to New Scientist pointing out how ironic it was that the whole ID thing was basically Creationism that had evolved camouflage. :-)

  64. 64 Kite ( Assclownius Maximus ) Nov 16th, 2006 at 2:28 pm

    XD
    .
    Excellent point. RAmen, brother.

  65. 65 Thank God im an Atheist Nov 16th, 2006 at 3:11 pm

    aa thank you mad kidd john, my mistake i thought i knew you

  66. 66 Mad John Kidd Nov 16th, 2006 at 3:34 pm

    No problem, my fellow Pastafarian.

  67. 67 Mad John Kidd Nov 16th, 2006 at 3:52 pm

    no problem douche bag

  68. 68 Anthony Danza Nov 16th, 2006 at 3:54 pm

    I have a couple of questions. First, if I convert to Pastafarianism, do I have to give up pasta? And also, if everyone in the world quit eating noodles for a whole week, will the FSM then reveal himself and return to lead us?

  69. 69 Homo narrans Nov 16th, 2006 at 3:55 pm

    Oh look, another shit-for-brains impersonator.

  70. 70 Mad John Kidd Nov 16th, 2006 at 3:57 pm

    My imposter is back. How complimentary.

  71. 71 Anthony Danza Nov 16th, 2006 at 4:13 pm

    I was hoping the followers of His Holy Dangling Appendage would be more open to those on the path of sincere search for the truth. I could also go for the discovery channel but I find them a bit too complacent to actually respect. It’s like too hard science for my medium sized appendage.

    What I’m really getting at is that I don’t a religion that doesn’t require some kind of sacrifice is ever going to cut the cheese, so to speak.

  72. 72 Anthony Danza Nov 16th, 2006 at 4:15 pm

    see. do I have to spell it out for you?

  73. 73 J FSM Nov 16th, 2006 at 4:18 pm

    AW DAM I wish my FUCKTARD kid sisterd hurry up and finish lettin the dog fuck her
    its my turn

  74. 74 sparrow Nov 16th, 2006 at 4:23 pm

    why does everybody forget that the FSM doesnt care if they believe in Him? submit all the “proof” you want that He doesn’t exist. He just laughs at it because He is drunk. He doesnt really WANT you to believe in Him, because He doesn’t want you to drink all His grog.

  75. 75 General Rotelle Nov 16th, 2006 at 5:45 pm

    I thought I remembered reading this:

    http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2005/10/1012_051012_chinese_noodles.html

    4,000 year old noodles, knucklehead.

    Does it count that I used Ask.com and didn’t Google it?

  76. 76 ur funny Nov 16th, 2006 at 9:39 pm

    hey hey mister ur just jelous that our faith makes a heck of a lot more since then urs… man discovered pasta then but hey the FSM choose for us to chose it then (bloody ID/Aethiests)

  77. 77 Nick the Infidel Nov 16th, 2006 at 9:54 pm

    I am posting this in various threads, because I wan’t all your opinions on this article:

    I’m in the bible belt, but I have a harder time provoking fundies than you might think (I try my ass off though).
    .
    .
    Heres a good example though: An opinion piece on evolution was published in my school newspaper today. The author was attempting to prove that you can believe in evolution and “creationism” at the same time (an opinion I generally agree with, well religion, but not creationism), yet the author didn’t seem to understand the premises of evolution or creationism.
    .
    She included such chestnuts as refering to “Darwins theory of the descent of man” (a book, but not in any way the actual theory), and “I think it is possible that God was simply practicing when he created the dinosaurs”. On top of it all she claimed to be a scientist (in an intro Bio Class :) )
    .
    .
    I have been flaming her idiocy on the newspapers website all day, yet no one in my university of 22,000 people thought that it was important enough to speak up!
    Please read this article and post a comment:
    http://www.theeastcarolinian.com/media/storage/paper915/news/2006/11/16/Opinion/Correction.Evolution-2462676.shtm

  78. 78 pasta protector Nov 16th, 2006 at 10:09 pm

    The link says “link not found” Nick

  79. 79 Nick the Infidel Nov 16th, 2006 at 10:14 pm
  80. 80 Mad John Kidd Nov 16th, 2006 at 10:15 pm

    Actually, what you are describing is the concept known as ‘theistic evolution’ which quite effectively defines the process of evolution as being generated by a god. Many evolutionists who also happen to believe in Christianity have no problem with this concept. “Finding Darwin’s God” by Kenneth Miller, a devout Catholic, is worth a read.

  81. 81 Nick the Infidel Nov 16th, 2006 at 10:19 pm

    I have no problem with theistic evolution, (read my replies, I’m pastafarian), but that article mis-represents both evolution and creationism. She is defending creationism, yet doesn’t realize that most are YEC’s, who believe nothing of the sort that she is putting forth.

  82. 82 Mad John Kidd Nov 16th, 2006 at 10:24 pm

    @Nick the Infidel

    Because ID/creationism has no scientific data for support, they often use political coercion and twist the truth to fit their beliefs. Cherry-picking and quote-minig are amoung other common tacts. Are you familiar with

    http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/list.html

  83. 83 Nick the Infidel Nov 16th, 2006 at 10:39 pm

    I have looked all around talk origins, they rule! The issue I have is that the author supports creationism, when she doesn’t even understand the basic tenets that creationsists propose. Worsely (is that a word?) She misrepresents basic tenets of biology.
    She hasn’t been coerced by AIG or the Discovery Institute, she made all this up on her own.

  84. 84 pasta protector Nov 16th, 2006 at 10:43 pm

    Nick, I’ll read the article later as I’m a bit short on time. I did read the first few of your replies though and look forward to reading rest later as well. Well done!!
    RAmen

  85. 85 Mad John Kidd Nov 16th, 2006 at 11:29 pm

    @ Nick

    I only caught the second page, so I had to go back and read the first. She could have been more specific on what a “normal biology class” was; that’s a bit vague. It gave no indication as to what level.

    .

    I see your point, she does confuse YEC with Christianity, with scientists who believe in Christianity. She claims to be a scientist but is still in school. Normally, a practicing scientist would have graduated. Also “a scientist” is a bit vague. I would not consider a partical physicist to be any sort of expert on evolutionary biology. And I’m not suggesting that she is a physicist.

    .

    Her God created a perfect world, yet the dinosaurs could have been a failed experiment. This negates the definition of perfect. Her knowledge of the fossil record is all but nonexistent. Evolution does not require belief in order to occur, creationism does.

    .

    While evolution theory has progressed beyond Darwin’s orginal Theory of Natural Selection because of thing like genetics and a much larger fossil record the two are not independent from one another. In the end, she straddles the fence having failed to make a descent argument for or against either side. Evolution and creationism are mutually exclusive, but Christianity does not necessarily prelude evolution.

    .

    Hope this has been of some help.

    .

    RAmen

  86. 86 Nick the Infidel Nov 16th, 2006 at 11:46 pm

    Thanks Mad John.

    I’m pretty sure I know what biology class she is in, and its not the one for majors. Please copy your thoughts to that website so that my university can have some civil discourse for once.

    I’m a hairs length away from recieving my masters in Biology, yet I don’t claim to be a scientist. I’ll wait till someone pays me the big bucks (Ha HA), before I adopt that title. Til then I’m just another “science bitch”.

  87. 87 Pasta Parmesan Nov 16th, 2006 at 11:53 pm

    On the topic of Fundie misrepresentation of evolution, have you noticed that they by and large are social Darwinists? The old “we are rich because we are superior”, and “the poor are poor because they are inferior/subhuman” line.
    Fairly similar to most of those in power from Ancient Egypt through to early 20th Century European royalty who claimed they ruled by divine right. Free trade, and laissez-faire Ayn Rand economics are built on “survival of the fittest (read: greediest)”.

    RAmen

  88. 88 Nick the Infidel Nov 17th, 2006 at 12:06 am

    Or the exact mentality that was the justification behind colonialism from around 1400 through the 1900’s. There’s no reason to include Darwin’s name in this crap, it was being justified long before Darwin postulated his totally unrelated theorem.

  89. 89 Mad John Kidd Nov 17th, 2006 at 12:56 am

    @ Nick…

    What area does your thesis concern? If I may ask. I’m a field archaeologist by trade but my first degree was in field biology. I still like to keep up on curent issues in evolution theory.

  90. 90 nikkiee Nov 17th, 2006 at 2:30 am

    @Pasta Parmesan
    “The old “we are rich because we are superior”, and “the poor are poor because they are inferior/subhuman”
    Sounds a bit like “we are special and better because we believe in a supernatural being” and “they are inferior because they don’t” doesn’t it?
    RAmen

  91. 91 Mad John Kidd Nov 17th, 2006 at 2:47 am

    Very true, social Darwinism has been flaunted by the likes of Adolf Hitler as well as Ted Haggard, yet they all seem to forget that the evolution of humans has lead to the Golden Rule, as well.

  92. 92 nikkiee Nov 17th, 2006 at 7:51 am

    Anyone else get the feeling that there is no-one has been steering this galleon for the past 24hrs?

  93. 93 NOT CHEMUNG Nov 17th, 2006 at 9:42 am

    Lets see if this one works….

  94. 94 teab-ag Nov 17th, 2006 at 10:20 am

    pasta farieism? wtf is that?

  95. 95 Natalie Nov 17th, 2006 at 10:55 am

    The Flying Spaghetti Monster is the funniest poke at fanatical Christianity that I have ever seen. It is completely hilarious that so many get upset and infuriated at something that is not in any way serious. The Flying Spaghetti Monster parody of Creationism is ingenius. And if the fanatical Christians don’t like it, well….screw them.

  96. 96 Natalie Nov 17th, 2006 at 10:57 am

    The fanatical Christians should bow to their sensei because the Flying Spaghetti Monster is the funniest, most ingenius parody of Creationism I’ve ever seen. Anyone who is deeply offended by the FSM should get over themselves and learn how to take a joke. If they’re still offended….f*ck ‘em.

  97. 97 PLC Nov 17th, 2006 at 11:15 am

    Yes, spaghetti is a recent invention, but it was made by man in the image of the FSM as a tribute to the great and undying entity that has saved so many souls. Spaghetti feeds the spirit and the body of the worshipper making him just a better person, adding bolognase sauce to symbolize the past sacrifices of FSM and olive oil to anoint the one true god is the road to true salvation. FSM is not a poke at christianity it is the one true salvation, try it or one of its disciples (farfelle, sapghettini, rotini, etc.) and be amazed at the power released within you by accepting the FSM into your body and mind.

  98. 98 LA Clay Nov 17th, 2006 at 11:16 am

    I applaud this new religion. We haven’t had a decent new religion since the Mormans. I don’t count Scientology as a religion, even though they do.

    I felt a need to respond to all of those that say the Pasta wasn’t created until 500 ad or so. This does not pre-empt he existance of the noodleful hevens.

    Remember the Earth WAS FLAT until 1492. Then ONE MAN declared it was round. People generally came around and the world became round.

    For the simple minded, it became round BY AGREEMENT. It WAS flat because everybody said it was, now it round BEACUSE we say so.

    By my agreement, and others, the FSM becomes more real every day.

  99. 99 Nikkiee Nov 17th, 2006 at 3:42 pm

    “By my agreement, and others, the FSM becomes more real every day.”
    .
    You mean accepted as real.
    RAmen

  100. 100 That dude under your bed Nov 17th, 2006 at 5:54 pm

    Pasta, in all it’s perfectness, was not realized until that time. It is quite a complex food that the FSM would not want us to know the secrets of until we were ready to take it.

  101. 101 nikkiee Nov 17th, 2006 at 6:01 pm

    Quite right underbed dweller.

  102. 102 The Antipasta Nov 17th, 2006 at 7:03 pm

    Come over to my side…….. I’ve got the dressing you want……..

  103. 103 nikkiee Nov 17th, 2006 at 7:12 pm

    dressing?

  104. 104 The Antipasta Nov 17th, 2006 at 7:21 pm

    Or lack of? Hell it don’t matter, just come on over!!!

  105. 105 nikkiee Nov 17th, 2006 at 8:24 pm

    Where are you? Are you in the clouds?

  106. 106 Mad John Kidd Nov 17th, 2006 at 10:35 pm

    The clouds of his own mind?

  107. 107 Gennifer Nov 18th, 2006 at 7:34 am

    I try to be a pious Pastafarian. Noodle knows I do. But sometimes I see statements like this and my faith is truly sauced. (Not one for dogma, I don’t say hail-spaghettis as I was raised to do; though I do still genuflect with the sign of the crossed knife and fork.)

    My point is this: When I’m in public and I see somebody disrespect the FSM and I know that my bleiefs can help that person, is it better to just be humble as the Noodle taught? Or, should I spread the sauce and approach the person?

  108. 108 Your Middle Schoor Teacher Nov 18th, 2006 at 7:38 am

    “Remember the Earth WAS FLAT until 1492. Then ONE MAN declared it was round.”

    Huh? It was comon knowledge the world was round in 1492. Columbus would neevr have been sponsored otherwise. It’s been known by ass-clown scientists and horizon-watching sea captains for 2000 years, as, it’s really obvious. Sounds like you should question your public education (if that is, indeed, where you heard this belief).

  109. 109 One Eyed Jack Nov 18th, 2006 at 7:45 am

    Actually, it’s an oblate spheroid (slightly larger around the equator — not unlike many adult males).

  110. 110 A Well-known Celebrity Nov 18th, 2006 at 10:22 pm

    It took me over a year to tell my family I had converted to CotFSM. Although it has been difficult for my parents (mum’s an Irish-Catholic, Dad’s a Muslim and my sister was born Jewish), imagine my surprise when I visited this weekend and my mum had cooked a whole pot of spaghetti! Granted, it was vegi with no meatballs, but she IS trying to understand! Pasta work in mysterious ways. FSM noodles those who noodle themselves. Can I get a RAmen?

  111. 111 Pixel Pete Nov 19th, 2006 at 5:41 pm

    And humans have only been around since the… Stone Age, I don’t know anyhow. But if god looks like us than he couldn’t have been around to make the Earth. Google it knuckle-f***.
    RAmen(to both of us well-known celebrity)

  112. 112 One Eyed Jack Nov 19th, 2006 at 6:46 pm

    A Well-known Celebrity,
    .
    RAmen.

  113. 113 Alchemist Nov 19th, 2006 at 6:57 pm

    @OEJ. Come on. Next thing you’ll be telling us is that the earth revolves around the sun!

  114. 114 One Eyed Jack Nov 19th, 2006 at 7:20 pm

    Alchemist,
    .
    Well, that’s just silly. The sun and the earth revolve around a common “barycenter” or center of mass of the two bodies. Earth revolving around the sun… that’s a good one! ;-)
    .
    OEJ

  115. 115 Wench Nikkiee Nov 19th, 2006 at 7:58 pm

    @A Well-known Celebrity
    Sounds like you have a great family!
    RAmen
    .
    I thought the sun and the earth revolved around our great Noodley One?
    RAmen

  116. 116 john Nov 19th, 2006 at 8:31 pm

    leapofaith - looks like you’re the one takin’ that leap based on nothing but faith.

  117. 117 Jack Sparrow Nov 20th, 2006 at 3:13 am

    I thought the FSM made the world look like it was older than it actually is! The world could of even been made in 500-900 AD!

  118. 118 Penne Nov 20th, 2006 at 7:40 am

    Jack Sparrow,-drinking and smoking can do the same thing,maybe the FSM will take pity and invest in a good moisturizer.

  119. 119 Nick Nov 20th, 2006 at 9:42 am

    Problem, Spaghetti and pasta didn’t exist till the 500 - 900 AD. Google it knucklehead.

    Wow! Google found it therefore it must be true! Now that is what I call a leap of faith!

  120. 120 Amberly Nov 20th, 2006 at 2:17 pm

    Pasta existed before then, but was not known to man. Flying Spaghetti monster came to earth in the form of pasta much later, that he might give pasta as his gift to man.

  121. 121 Jingles Nov 20th, 2006 at 7:31 pm

    Hey guys, just like to let you all know, if you don’t already, J has got The Letter off.
    .
    Should be interesting to see the response we get.

  122. 122 C Nov 20th, 2006 at 8:26 pm

    Whoas. You are STUPID, ren’t you? Of cours, the the Flying Spaghetti Monster WENT BACK IN TIME!

    Now, that just breaks your whole theory, doesn’t it?

  123. 123 Peg Leg Dave Nov 20th, 2006 at 11:17 pm

    As far as I am aware “irreducible complexity” poses a greater problem for ID than evolutionary theory. It is the sad little crutch used to prop up ID arguments that is constantly being kicked over. First it was the hand, then the eye and recently the bacterial flagellum. In all cases the argument for irreducible complexity has been debunked. In fact the “irreducible complexity” of the bacterial flagellum was disproved 8 years ago and it is still being dragged out as the flagship argument for ID.

  124. 124 Saxxon Nov 20th, 2006 at 11:58 pm

    Well good thing we have ourselves a 1530 year old man on the forum to clear things up for us. Time is like clam sauce for the FSM artard.

  125. 125 Nick Davies Nov 21st, 2006 at 5:41 am

    First some self-evident truths:

    (1) The theory of evolution accounts for the diversity of life, not its origin. As evidence is gathered to support the theory it will become a ‘law’. If the evidence does not support the theory, then another theory will be developed which includes the new evidence. This is the scientific method. However, there are rules about evidence - it must be incontrovertible and not just an argument or opinion.

    (2) Matters of faith or dogma cannot be countered with any argument that draws on rationality ie requiring logic, consistency or the production of evidence. The whole point of faith is that one believes in the assertion (or postulate) implicitly and no supporting evidence is required. The whole point of rational argument is that a chain of resoning is presente with supporting evidence provided to prove each step in the reasoning.

    (3) Intelligent Design is not a theory and has no chain of reasoning. Evidence is provided, but most evidence can be explained by other theories such as the theory of evolution. Where the theory of evolution is found to be lacking, such as in accounting for the evolution of the bombardier beetle, then the scientific method allows for more evidence to be found to support the theory, or the theory to be adapted or the theory to be discarded and replaced with something better. Intelligent Design, on the other hand, insists first the theory is inviolate and then selectively presents evidence to support it. Any other interpretation of the facts is decried because it does not support the theory. This is the opposite of science and does not conform to the scientific method and so cannot be described as a scientific theory.

    (4) The account of the flying spaghetti monster and the related creation myth is no less valid then any other creation myth and deserves the respect of the theological community. Correspondingly, any mythology, concerning the creation or otherwise, is not science but is storytelling and must be respected as any other work of a creative mind.

    Given these facts, one is forced to certain conclusions and questions to carry forward to the next step in the debate.

    (1) Intelligent Design and Pastafarianism are not scientific theories and have no place in a classroom dedicated to rationality, let alone science.

    (2) The theory of evolution is a scientific theory and the scientific method insists it be challenged, but on a scientific basis.

    (3) The flying spaghetti monster myth is no less credible and possibly more entertaining than any other but, like any other myth (concerning the creation or otherwise), should be judged on its entertainment value alone. Veracity is simply not an issue.

  126. 126 Wench Nikkiee Nov 21st, 2006 at 6:01 am

    @Peg Leg Dave
    “In fact the “irreducible complexity” of the bacterial flagellum was disproved 8 years ago and it is still being dragged out as the flagship argument for ID.”
    .
    Isn’t it wonderful when ID keeps us laughing as it just keeps digging its own grave.

  127. 127 Homo narrans Nov 21st, 2006 at 6:14 am

    “Isn’t it wonderful when ID keeps us laughing as it just keeps digging its own grave.”
    .
    No, ID’s grave was dug by science long ago. ID is currently a zombie which hasn’t figured out it’s supposed to be dead.

  128. 128 jesus christ Nov 21st, 2006 at 12:24 pm

    i believe in a recent issue of National Geographic, they had a whole article about evolution. in it, they showed how the evolution of the eye works.
    .
    there you have all you ID fucks. we can show you how the eye evolved. the next step is to make sure people learn to accept it. i bet they probably won’t because they don’t want to seem foolish.
    .
    behe, in his own world, views his idea as evidence of design. however, with all pseudoscientific theories, it is proved to be retarded. just because he is a biochemist doesn’t mean he can prove ID. ID is a joke.
    .
    the ID proponents are good at making themselves look like assholes, yet they fail to prove their point.