 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Bobby, your site is amusing, and I can agree that ID does not belong in science classes. However, I also believe that Evolution does not belong in science classes for much the same reason. Let’s stick to chemistry, physics and biology based on the scientific theory.
-dave
The Church of the FSM is always looking for content. Details here
The Church is funded entirely by your purchases of FSM merchandise. Thank you for your support.
An elaborate spoof on Intelligent Design, The Gospel of the Flying Spaghetti Monster is neither too elaborate nor too spoofy to succeed in nailing the fallacies of ID. It's even wackier than Jonathan Swift's suggestion that the Irish eat their children as a way to keep them from being a burden, and it may offend just as many people, but Henderson, described elsewhere as a 25-year-old "out-of-work physics major," puts satire to the same serious use that Swift did. Oh, yes, it is very funny. -- Scientific American
Purchase from Amazon.com
Add these buttons to your site:
Bobby's Blog
Contact Bobby: Contact Me
 |
 |
Ω@ΩΩΩ@@@@,
.
ΩΩ@@ΩΩ@@,
ΩΩΩ@@@@ΩΩΩΩ@ΩΩ&#
937;@!
.
@@ΩΩ Ω@Ω @ Ω@ΩΩ@
@@ΩΩΩ, ΩΩ@@ ΩΩ
Ω@Ω @ ΩΩ@@Ω ΩΩ@@
ΩΩΩΩ ΩΩ Ω @@ Ω@Ω
@@Ω.
.
Ω@@Ω@@,
.
Ω@ΩΩΩ
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Very artistic Davey, but I see illegal numbers. I forgot we are keeping 0 as well to avoid the null system.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Mind you “k” or “c” could probably go?
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Sodding line wrap spoilt my joke.
.
Bah!
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Nah see, I think if we butcher the l33t system (which I am not overly familiar with) we could end up with something like:
a = @, A = 4, E = 3, G = 6, I = 1, O = 0, S = 5 etc
so to tie in the illegal numbers again:
A = +, E = +/, G = +++, I = /, S = ++/
Now, / und+/e++/t+nd th+t th/++/ c0uld g+/t + l/ttl+- c0nfu++//ng but /t w/ll b+/ w0rth /t wh+/n w+/ tr+n++/l+t+/ th+/ g0++/p+/l /nt0 th+/ l+n+++u+++++/ th+t th+/ n00dly 0n+/ /nt+/nd+/d….
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
00p++/
/ m+/+nt N0w….
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
I suspect that we all need to get out more!
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Well, I don’t know about you but I am at work, this *is* me getting out.
When I get home I won’t be on here…
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
i LOVE this site. I am only at highschool but i suspect this is a blessing as i can convert many that i come into contact with . Exellent idea, i am an athiest and i enjoy your satire. and i would happily follow this religion for the rest of my life. I promosie i will tell EVERYONE i know about this site.
A newly converted fan.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Nice work my child.
Go forth into the world and spread his joyful message, perhaps, if I may be so bold, accompany it with a little ciabatta or parmesan.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Im back, and i am glad to report that i have converted at least a few of my friends. I was suprised to find mixed receptions to my ranting. But anyone who isnt interested and enthralwed by this does not desserve to be enlightened. I will continue the work have begun. the whole of western Austrlaia must know!
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
*Australia
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Ahh…another aussie. Music to the ears of the Great Southern Land. This is a global religous movement and must be represented by all.
RAmen
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
testing
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
*Snigger*
Just saw this and had to share:
http://tinyurl.com/yyfgfg
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
I am so glad i found this site, I like to see someone have a go at over zelous Christains.
To teach religion in school is altogether wrong, it taints the fountan of knowledge for the youth. It gives the religon with the upper hand, even more power. It can cause un needed tension between different peoples. I hope this law NEVER makes it to australia, but luckily we have a diverse and pretty equal share of religious power in our country and no one religion can claim there beliefs are fact, and have it forced on people through an institution. It goes against the principals of freedom to allow one’s beliefs to be the only chosen for teaching. It goes against the idea of unity to make it seem that others are wrong, which religion has done for far too long. It should not offend people that the institution is being mocked, oh no. It SHOULD offend people that such a practice still exists! and that only one alternative is being offered. I would like to say in response to those who are oposed to this site, YOU HAVE NO RIGHT TO BE OFFENDED! YOU HAVE NO RIGHT TO COMPLAIN! YOU LOVE AND SUPPORT FREEDOM, AND YET YOU OPRESS IT IN YOUR RICHEOUS STUPID WAY! I SHOULD BE THE ONE OFFENDED, NOT YOU. SO SHUTTUP AND SIDDOWN!!
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Howdy Alec… good to see the green and gold is starting to rock up in more force, and especially good to see I’m not the only pastafarian in W.A.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
W.A, the best state. and no crappy daylight saving thank you very much.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Hey… whats wrong with DLS? Try it before you knock it.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
I found out a long time ago that life is
simpler and more interesting if one
uses only irrational and imaginary numbers.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
I found out a long time ago that life is
simpler and more interesting if one
uses only irrational and imaginary numbers.
(Double post ’cause I misspelled my name(handle) — spending
way too much time at the beer volcano.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Yes faded bear . We have yet to address those pesky numbers when our brains re-solidify from the meldown dunc sent them into. (mine anyway)
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
You know, I read down a couple of responses to what Davey had posted. I actually had a thermo prof use the law of entropy to try and prove that there was a higher being of some sort. As I recall it was only a few lectures after he disproved global warming. I tend to agree with him on both counts. Global warming is a farce, and “higher beings” than my thermo prof almost certainly exist. Higher beings like snowboarders, Jamaican’s, all other chronic tokers, and of course …… mother inlaws.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
“I actually had a thermo prof use the law of entropy to try and prove that there was a higher being of some sort.”
There appears to be a driving force built into a spontaneous process that propels it in a given direction and it has been determined that this force is the mighty FSM.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
A representation of the disorder of His Noodliness.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Oh by the Heavens!
Yeah this site and its idea are a big fun joke, and like all GOOD jokes it is made to make poeple THINK about things. But not so many writing here seem to do that. Nonetheless, let me point out one thing: I have been reading the words about “Evolution Theory” everywhere, in posts AND anwers.
Guys: evolution is NOT a theory. It was in the back-centuries when all man could do was look at birds fly by. We are in 2006 for His Noodly Heaven’s sake! ^___^
Freudism is theory. Jungism is. Statistics. “Which is the best way to obtain a date with someone you like” is a theory.
Rain, cheese, algebra, the Punic Wars, the hybrid electric car engine, evolution, headache are NOT theories.
Do not write “evolution theory”. you are feeding their side!
Yaarrrrr!
^__^
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
@faded bear – imaginary numbers are verboten! only the mighty 2 exists all other numbers are merely 2 wannabes (See ‘Bobby your site is amusing’ thread)
@nikkiee – sorry aboot yer noggin, get yersel away tae yon beer volanoe an dinna stoap drinkin till ye faw ower. (the Scotland contingent of followers is strong too, even if they don’t post much)
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
*slaps self* this *IS* the bobby.. thread dunc… nearly hometime, caffiene wearing off… sleepy… sooo sleepy… need pasta…
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
@Logan:
`
“Theory” means something different in scientific terms than it does in grammatical ones. A scientific theory is an explanation or reason for a law. We have laws of genetics; we have the theory of evolution. We know there are genes, we know they mutate, we know that there is a process by which they do so. These are incontrivertible facts; hence, they are considered law.
`
We use the theory of evolution to explain the process by which this law is executed. Since we cannot prove that our interpretation of evolution is succinct and complete unto itself, we must consider it a theory. Theories are constantly tested by the scientific community to ensure they are still valid. Theories are repeatable, generable, and consistent across any given set of parameters for all empirical data.
`
So it’s okay to be a theory. =)
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
I can see the anti bullying ads now
Teacher FACT sits next to upset chile THEORY patting on shoulder
“there there, it’s okay to be a theory”…
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Dunc-
Perhaps the reason I get along so well with irrational and imaginary numbers
is that I spend a lot of time in another dimension where the FSM is made from strings of meat and big puffy pasta balls.
You should come visit sometime. You seem to be more
comfortable with numbers than I am, so you could maybe help
me out with some of the more difficult bits.
!NEMAR
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
yay! he isnt insulting us or calling us gay!
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
“Do not write “evolution theoryâ€. you are feeding their side!”
How about “Darwinian Principles” or “Evolutionary Principles” ?
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Laws?
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
“Common Bleedin’ Sense”?
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
A thermo prof using the laws to prove the existence of a higher being? Mine uses them to prove what bs creationism is, anyone else here read Asimov ‘the army of the night’? At least I think that’s what it was called…
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Just use plain old “evolution.” I hate when people think they can have their cake and eat it too: accept all of science, except for evolutionary biology. Evolution is as much a part of science as astronomy or geology; you just can’t single it out. “I believe 2+2 is 4 and 4+4=8 but I just won’t believe 40+2 = 42!!!!”
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
you know…all fact tought in science class is just a theory. It takes Decades for a theory to be developed. It needs to be tested and compared. Gravity is only a theory bu nobod has any problem with that being tought because it does not threaten a God’s power. Because Evolution poses a threat to creationist beliefe they draw attention to the fact that it is a theory. EVERYTHING IN SCIENCE CLASS IS A THEORY. This is because science is always sarching for the truth. Until they find it for definate they stck with the apparant truth. Like how it is apparant that sodium reacts with water for a number of reasons.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
why can’t the world just accept evolution.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Fortunately, evolution has happened, is happening, and will continue to happen whether anyone of us meager humans is around to witness it, or not.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
@Davey Jones’ Slacker– hah! Niiice.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
@Mad John Kidd
WHOA! You just blew my world out of perspective!! Amazing!
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
@mad john kid
thanks for the advice. i’ll keep that in mind
Ramen
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Glad to be of service.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
keep fighting the good fight, we wouldn’t want the world to stop evolving because some idiots don’t believe in it, would we. (even though that would stop those dang superbugs)
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Hi Dave
Evolution on the short time frame has been proven repeatedly in labs, and is not a theory.
Evolution on the longer time frame has more evidence supporting it that any other human idea in history. So, while it cannot be proven without a time machine, it in nonetheless worthy of being taught in school.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Yay. Something we can all agree on! :D
Like or Dislike:
0 
0