Evolution is a fraud

Published September 24th, 2006 by Bobby Henderson
Evolution is a fraud. I refer you to “Shattering the Myth of Darwinism” by Richard Milton.

While one may correctly say that evolution is a fraud, that is not to say that that same person “believes in” Creation as it is literally set forth in Genesis.

The answer is: We don’t know where we came from. Let’s find out.

Evolution is as much, if not more, of an irrational religion than what any Creationist spouts.

Sean O’leary



458 Responses to “Evolution is a fraud”

1 2 3 58
  1. An anonymous individual says:

    Except that evolution has decades of scientific evidence to support it, whereas creationism only has faith to back it.

  2. Zook the keeper of the spaghetti sauce says:

    I am Zook the keeper of the spaghetti sauce. I am here to testify on behalf of the great Noodler himself. He has told me through a message in my alphabet soup that he is angry for the continual attempts to disprove him most obvious omnipresence and demands a monument be erected so those that are truly faithful may travel to this new Mecca of homage. I have begun the great task of building this accolade to our great creator. Other must also fulfill the edict of the great noodle and build shrines in their own towns until our scientific enlightenment is spread to everyone worthy of the great un-kept secret of the pirates and the spaghetti monster.

  3. M.L.B. says:

    Evolution is a changing, dynamic theory. When new information is discovered it can be added to the current theory or change the entire idea all together. Evolution is not conclusive proof of the origins of Humans or life in general, but it is the best guess based on the observance of the fossils in the rock record and the changing of species observed in modern time. While it is impossible to rerun the experiment of the Earth to observe the way the planet developed. It is possible to observe the record left of those changes through time (although much of the record is missing). Science can fill in the holes with logical conjecture.
    Science as a whole has been working on the conundrums of the universe since humans first looked into the sky and at the planet around them. The theories and laws of science have been developed as that understanding has increased. There have been mistakes made and new developments, but as a whole a natural world explanation is sought out first to explain happenings. Right now evolution is the theory of explanation for the development of life on this planet. New evidence could change it (though unlikely) but the dynamic of the science allows for that change.
    I am interested in the source you have provided, but I am weary of an argument based on a single source. I would be interested in your views of the development of life on the planet. You claim not to fully believe in Genesis creation, but do not provide your alternative creation theory. Your following statement suggest that you are open to the any possibility of how we came to be by “finding out”. I submit to you that deciding on the outcome (not evolution, and not Genesis creation) prior to research will give a skewed result.
    As always please be respectful of all persons that post here. Debate and arguments should be conducted as civil as possible. Name calling and disrespect just cause your opponent to become defensive and unwilling to listen. If you want to change the ideas and thoughts of another person it is impossible through attack.

  4. Rand says:

    I just keep laughing to myself and thinking something that doesn’t seem to occur to the religious wackos. It’s acutally possible for both theories to co-exist.

    Still with me? ok…

    Heres a metaphor for ya.

    God set up the dominoes and we’re seeing how they eventually fell.

    The dominoes being the building blocks of life (dna) and how they fell is the process of evolutionary mutation.

    logics a pisser ain’t it. :D

  5. Fizzy says:

    I want beer.

    Is the stripper factory customizable to each one’s standards?

    Some people like fat women but I like brunettes.

    I wouldn’t want to be a Christian when the world ends because of our own wrong-doing. I’m not worried about all of that shit, though…

    I just want the beer and strippers. Golden gates are for interior decorators and snobby aristocrats. It’s all a fabricated illusion…mirrors, even…

  6. Rand says:

    beer and strippers. can’t go wrong with that combo. :D

  7. Dispensor Ganesha! « Life is a street car named Desire says:

    [...] Btw, if you don’t know, FSM heaven guarantees endless supply of Beer(and strip clubs), though demands are being raised for Martinis too.  But why blame poor Pondit ji. Check out this comment in  our Church messagebox. Is the stripper factory customizable to each one’s standards?Some people like fat women but I like brunettes.I wouldn’t want to be a Christian when the world ends because of our own wrong-doing. I’m not worried about all of that shit, though…I just want the beer and strippers. Golden gates are for interior decorators and snobby aristocrats. It’s all a fabricated illusion… [...]

  8. Sum Yung Gai says:

    No, you and Milton are the frauds.

    In spite of actual, real science, you still want to hang on to your Creationism posing as science? Evolution is indeed a theory, and if you actually knew what the word “theory” meant, you would shut up and crawl back under the religious fundamentalist rock so that we could step on it. Hey, don’t get upset; you should be overjoyed to meet your Christian God at the earliest opportunity, right?

    I enjoyed insulting you here because you’re obviously no Christian, and you damned sure don’t act anything like Jesus would. You and others like you are attempting to use religion as a societal power device. The Dalai Lama, a Buddhist monk, is way, way more “Christian” than you or Milton will ever be.

1 2 3 58

Leave a Reply