Hi Bobby I find it thoroughly interesting the assumptions that are made as soon as someone mentions “Intelligent Design”. It’s quickly thought to be unprovable, therefore it should not be taught in schools. Then entire bases of intelligent design is showing the flaws in the evolutionary theory and if we did not evolve then where did we come from? Intelligent Design is taking the origin of the species back to formula. Darwin’s theory is left without a leg to stand on scientifically. If people wish to have faith in this swiss cheese theory, that is up to them, but allowing it to be the only theory presented in school is dogmatic. I understand the point of this so called religion of the Flying Spagetti Monster. The ignorance that flows from the purpose of this obscene “religion” is quite amusing. However, its reasoning is flawed. You wish for people to teach the theory of the Flying Spagetti Monster with out any plausible scientific backing, where as Intelligent Design is only using science to show the flaws in evolution and to say that another theory needs to be made. Perhaps you should study things more thorough before starting a movement… Enjoy, Brad
Connect with other Pastafarians
Propaganda Buttons
Add these buttons to your site:
RSS Feeds
Support the Cause
The Church is funded entirely by your purchases of FSM merchandise. Thank you for your support.
Purchase the Gospel
An elaborate spoof on Intelligent Design, The Gospel of the Flying Spaghetti Monster is neither too elaborate nor too spoofy to succeed in nailing the fallacies of ID. It's even wackier than Jonathan Swift's suggestion that the Irish eat their children as a way to keep them from being a burden, and it may offend just as many people, but Henderson, described elsewhere as a 25-year-old "out-of-work physics major," puts satire to the same serious use that Swift did. Oh, yes, it is very funny. -- Scientific American
uh dude. ID has NO SCIENTIFIC data behind it. Just an idea of irreducible complexity. NO DATA. And the reason Evolution is taught in science class is because as a THEORY it does have data which supports it. Perhaps you should think before posting Brad.
you are correct, id doesnt have any proof, they only poke holes in evolution, but the open letter would be so much less fun if all we did was try to disprove evolution… very good point
1: Do you think of ancient Greek mythology as wrong as soon as somebody mentions it?
2: Show me the evidence that Evolution is wrong and ID is correct.
Since when is ID the scientific side of the argument? And why oh why can nobody take a joke?
actually Evolution has more evidence than any other theory, and do you find it weird givin your standpoint that only heavy duty bible humpers are the only ones that beleive in it, think about it.