Dear Mr. Henderson:
I understand that it is easy to poke fun at Creationists without endangering the shattering of your evolution fan tasty. Nevertheless I had hoped a man with your keen sense of humor and self-proclaimed desperation for employment) would get his fellow believers to sponsor him in a Quixotic quest for ten grand by winning the Life Science Prize.
Reality is that you have no evidence, not Star Wars, not swords, not pitchforks, not pointed shoes, nothing. When you failed to contend for the Life Science Prize it proves you are just another evolutionist who is all bluff and no science, or as they say in the Southwest, all hat and no ranch.
Your Flying Spaghetti Monsterism is closer to real science than evolutionism because spaghetti does exist. Evolution is completely absent in the universe today, always has been, always will be. Every item associated with humans, animals and plants are creations, always have been, always will be. Creation is science because it is observable by billions of people trillions of times, always has been, always will be.
Do you understand?
Sincerely, Karl Priest
lol. i used to keep imperial scorpions myself. my last one died a few months back (it was at least 7 years old, so i’m not too surprised) and since i started university i can’t keep them in my halls of residence. a shame, really.
@Homo narrans
“a shame, really.”
hahaha…
I probably wouldn’t think it a shame if I roomed close by. Do they sting?
a sting from Pandinus imperator is no worse than that of a common wasp - though it is possible for humans to be alergic. i’ve never been stung, though.
@penne
We have these rather large, dark brown to black horned beetles here. Not sure what their proper name is, but we call them Rhinoceros beetles or Ponsiana (sp?… after the type of tree they inhabit) beetles. They don’t seem to be intelligently designed. If they fall over onto their back, which they appear to do constantly, they seem to be mostly unable to right themselves again and to spend half their life upside down. So it seems anyway!
However there is always a few around, so I guess they manage to survive. Just as you say, very determined.
@Penne
-creepy crawlies?-Well,thats just mean
.
I only meant it in a general way, not derogatory. But you can keep your spiders. I don’t kill them, but I prefer they find somewhere, not too close to me, to live.
-Alot of them open up their wings(shells) to right themselves.What I’ve always wondered is with their rounded smooth backs, how they manage to multiply in the first place.Getting it on must be difficult enough, but getting it off must be murder! -I don’t think they practice ‘misonary style’
It’;s time for bed here. Catch all you pirates later.
RAmen
hahaha…just caught that post. I’ll be looking forward to another clown chapter next time I log in.
RAmen
I don’t blame you about the spiders, Nikkiee. I’ve heard about your Brown Recluse. I certainly wouldn’t want one of them nesting in my knickers.Lucky for me, the spiders are very gentle and non-venomous.Growing up my cousin and I used to collect jar fulls and release them at school so they’d shut it down and fumeagate and we’d all get a holiday.And although they were the size of quarters and we must have caught hundereds,I never once got bit.
Yet ANOTHER example (of the many) of evolution (through survival of the fittest) that is observable TODAY is that of the common rattlesnake. Those that have a tendancy to rattle are being killed off by humans, because they are easily found. Therefore, those that do not have a tendancy to rattle are surviving, causing more and more rattlesnakes to have the “no rattle” gene. Soon enough, if this pattern stays, only non-rattling rattlesnakes will exist.
.
The point is, evolution within a species IS observable (and NOT absent today) in a multitude of examples (the above being just one). It is evolution outside of a species that is not observable (today), due to the long time needed for such transitions. However, there is enough evidence (via fossils, bones, and direct genetic observations) to suggest that long scale evolution (both within and outside of the species) is the most probable scientific theory.
I heard about that ‘trick,then all the rattle snakes will be quite and a lot more people will get bit. Ironic. I guess that will just make them want to kill the snakes even more.
it probably will increase human hostility towards snakes. but then, snakes which do not rattle will be more difficult to track down.
.
the damned bible at work again, with its anti-reptilian prejudices! there are plenty of cultures where the snake is a symbol of wisdom, or even sexuality.
Not to change the subject,but I belive we have been delivered a sign from the Great Noodlid One HIMSELF ,BEHOLD : http://www.usatoday.com/money/industries/retail/2006-11-27-pasta-camcorder_x.htm
-Noodled….RAmen.
PS, check out the add at the bottom of the page;I guess Dr,Demento must be desparate for work,he’s doing comercials.
you mean the chimp in the ad?
i see where you’re coming from…
Dr Demento is clearly one of His favored people.
“The DJ of funny music”. hmm… a nice ring.
anyway,
@ Karl Preist:
actually, if you were able to disprove evolution and prove creationism, you might be able to actually do more than make us laugh. we have science, biology, intelligence, etc, and a constantly growing pool of evidence that would take several lifetimes to read PROVING EVOLUTION, whereas creationism has an old book and some pseudo-scientists, plus an IQ deprived president or two.
.
(fundamentalist religious pseudo-scientist: “I don’t get it, so God must have done it. Science scientist: “but I get it! it makes perfect sense! we just proved evolution! and that creationism couldn’t…
Fundamentalist religious pseudo-scientist: SHutup,, u fukingg anetiCHRIST asshoole!)
.
and so it continues…
RAmen
and if you see a creationistic creation, could you please point it out to me?
figures, out of billions of people, we with scientific interests always end up getting left out of seeing those things…
ah, well.
alas, Gnocci Man, we haven’t proven evolution. we have merely amassed lifetimes’ worth of evidence which supports evolution.
.
but the whole premise of this site is that nothing can be 100% proven or disproven.