Bobby, Right now you are behaving in a manner that is a disgrace to Roseburg & our schools. You need to come to know Jesus Christ as your Savior, He created you & loves you. Only if you accept Him will you be with Him in heaven some day. Don’t miss out! Roseburg Christian - Mike and Joan Lorenzen -
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Squingleberg -- You really amaze me
- Linguini Lass -- go fuck yourselves
- Cottura 5 Minuti -- You really amaze me
- fat -- MTU Pastafarians harassed
- dad -- dream interpreter needed
- Joe Marinara -- go fuck yourselves
- Logan the grog keeper -- Today's Brevity
- hexhunter -- dream interpreter needed
- Niteshade -- go fuck yourselves
- Scotty B -- go fuck yourselves
Contribute
The Church of the FSM is looking for content. Details here
RSS Feeds
Support the Cause
Purchase the Gospel
An elaborate spoof on Intelligent Design, The Gospel of the Flying Spaghetti Monster is neither too elaborate nor too spoofy to succeed in nailing the fallacies of ID. It's even wackier than Jonathan Swift's suggestion that the Irish eat their children as a way to keep them from being a burden, and it may offend just as many people, but Henderson, described elsewhere as a 25-year-old "out-of-work physics major," puts satire to the same serious use that Swift did. Oh, yes, it is very funny. -- Scientific American
Misc.










Right now you are behaving in a manner that is a disgrace of not only Roseburg, but of the whole US of A, which is a secular country last time I checked. So good day to you, Christians.
RAmen
Yeah but our god means he does not have to work. That better that jebus. What did he do for people? Other than steal there money.
Also may the sauce be with you. Nearly forgot!
I really think the Lorenzens mean well. Unfortunately, so did Ferdinand and Isabella.
`
And technically… Jesus Christ did not create man. You could make a claim for the statement that in his incarnation as part of the Holy Trinity, he took some small part in it, but the creation of man predates his birth on terra firma, so I’d have to reject your statement on plausibility alone and canon in specific.
`
Best regards.