<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: This part of your website</title>
	<link>http://www.venganza.org/2005/08/18/this-part-of-your-website.htm</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 21:20:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Aristotle</title>
		<link>http://www.venganza.org/2005/08/18/this-part-of-your-website.htm#comment-102398</link>
		<author>Aristotle</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 05:40:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.venganza.org/2005/08/18/this-part-of-your-website.htm#comment-102398</guid>
		<description>"Are you really trying to make the argument that while creationism theories require absolute faith and have no scientific evidence behind them,(which I wouldnt argue) belief in the Big Bang theory of creation does not require equal or even greater faith? I think that is a very foolish, ignorant, and hypocritical standpoint, especially coming from someone who screams so loudly about impartiality."
.
Note Big Bang *theory*
.
theory 
 - "a speculative idea or plan as to how something might be done"
 - "implies considerable evidence in support of a formulated general principle explaining the operation of certain phenomena"
.
belief 
 - "implies mental acceptance of something as true, even though absolute certainty may be absent"
.
No one said the Big Bang belief.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Are you really trying to make the argument that while creationism theories require absolute faith and have no scientific evidence behind them,(which I wouldnt argue) belief in the Big Bang theory of creation does not require equal or even greater faith? I think that is a very foolish, ignorant, and hypocritical standpoint, especially coming from someone who screams so loudly about impartiality.&#8221;<br />
.<br />
Note Big Bang *theory*<br />
.<br />
theory<br />
 - &#8220;a speculative idea or plan as to how something might be done&#8221;<br />
 - &#8220;implies considerable evidence in support of a formulated general principle explaining the operation of certain phenomena&#8221;<br />
.<br />
belief<br />
 - &#8220;implies mental acceptance of something as true, even though absolute certainty may be absent&#8221;<br />
.<br />
No one said the Big Bang belief.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon888</title>
		<link>http://www.venganza.org/2005/08/18/this-part-of-your-website.htm#comment-12891</link>
		<author>Jon888</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 18:02:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.venganza.org/2005/08/18/this-part-of-your-website.htm#comment-12891</guid>
		<description>This guy wasnt lying but it is where his degrees come from that worries me.

Ph.D., Religion and Social Ethics1
University of Pittsburgh

Master of Arts, History and Education1
Columbia University

Bachelor of Arts, History1
University of Pennsylvania


Yeah it took me a second to look this up but the Ph.D is in Religion and social ethics....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This guy wasnt lying but it is where his degrees come from that worries me.</p>
<p>Ph.D., Religion and Social Ethics1<br />
University of Pittsburgh</p>
<p>Master of Arts, History and Education1<br />
Columbia University</p>
<p>Bachelor of Arts, History1<br />
University of Pennsylvania</p>
<p>Yeah it took me a second to look this up but the Ph.D is in Religion and social ethics&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lamna</title>
		<link>http://www.venganza.org/2005/08/18/this-part-of-your-website.htm#comment-10395</link>
		<author>Lamna</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2006 19:24:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.venganza.org/2005/08/18/this-part-of-your-website.htm#comment-10395</guid>
		<description>Funny how Evolution has evidence backing up. But i would have to agree with Spencer Reesman Lets get the bullshit out of schools (ID) and teach only what we can prove (Evolution). And ive never heard anyone talk about mother nature like a god, it just a way of saying nature provides stuff for people life mother do. Why cant you at least find out what Evolution is about before you deniy it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny how Evolution has evidence backing up. But i would have to agree with Spencer Reesman Lets get the bullshit out of schools (ID) and teach only what we can prove (Evolution). And ive never heard anyone talk about mother nature like a god, it just a way of saying nature provides stuff for people life mother do. Why cant you at least find out what Evolution is about before you deniy it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Werefox Alchemist</title>
		<link>http://www.venganza.org/2005/08/18/this-part-of-your-website.htm#comment-4379</link>
		<author>Werefox Alchemist</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Oct 2006 05:23:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.venganza.org/2005/08/18/this-part-of-your-website.htm#comment-4379</guid>
		<description>So, in other words, nothing should be taught in schools on the subject of how everything came into being. Because Creationism is a faith too. So fuck off. And you, Sean, already sent in your hate mail. You had your say. So shut up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, in other words, nothing should be taught in schools on the subject of how everything came into being. Because Creationism is a faith too. So fuck off. And you, Sean, already sent in your hate mail. You had your say. So shut up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean O'Leary</title>
		<link>http://www.venganza.org/2005/08/18/this-part-of-your-website.htm#comment-3450</link>
		<author>Sean O'Leary</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2006 03:26:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.venganza.org/2005/08/18/this-part-of-your-website.htm#comment-3450</guid>
		<description>Evolution is a fraud. I refer you to "Shattering the Myth of Darwinism" by Richard Milton.

While one may correctly say that evolution is a fraud, that is not to say that that same person "believes in" Creation as it is literally set forth in Genesis.

The answer is: We don't know where we came from. Let's find out.

Evolution is as much, if not more, of an irrational religion than what any Creationist spouts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Evolution is a fraud. I refer you to &#8220;Shattering the Myth of Darwinism&#8221; by Richard Milton.</p>
<p>While one may correctly say that evolution is a fraud, that is not to say that that same person &#8220;believes in&#8221; Creation as it is literally set forth in Genesis.</p>
<p>The answer is: We don&#8217;t know where we came from. Let&#8217;s find out.</p>
<p>Evolution is as much, if not more, of an irrational religion than what any Creationist spouts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony</title>
		<link>http://www.venganza.org/2005/08/18/this-part-of-your-website.htm#comment-2289</link>
		<author>Anthony</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Sep 2006 12:24:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.venganza.org/2005/08/18/this-part-of-your-website.htm#comment-2289</guid>
		<description>As a thoroughgoing skeptic myself I've enjoyed lurking here but not responding (so many other people do it better). I do need to de-lurk now so I can ask what exactly was the content of Alexander F. C. Webster's Ph D.  

It certainly wasn't science or philosophy and the poor literary standard precludes English (despite using the word "jejune" which is the sort of pretentious word second-rate English Literature graduates like to use).

I'm beginning to think that possibly it was basket-weaving. Something that occupies the hands but doesn't really engage the brain too much. Probably from one of those backwater "Universities" in the more Southerly regions where all the staff are related to the students and there are some interesting genetic principles on display...

Or perhaps he bought it for $35 and a letter detailing his "life experience"!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a thoroughgoing skeptic myself I&#8217;ve enjoyed lurking here but not responding (so many other people do it better). I do need to de-lurk now so I can ask what exactly was the content of Alexander F. C. Webster&#8217;s Ph D.  </p>
<p>It certainly wasn&#8217;t science or philosophy and the poor literary standard precludes English (despite using the word &#8220;jejune&#8221; which is the sort of pretentious word second-rate English Literature graduates like to use).</p>
<p>I&#8217;m beginning to think that possibly it was basket-weaving. Something that occupies the hands but doesn&#8217;t really engage the brain too much. Probably from one of those backwater &#8220;Universities&#8221; in the more Southerly regions where all the staff are related to the students and there are some interesting genetic principles on display&#8230;</p>
<p>Or perhaps he bought it for $35 and a letter detailing his &#8220;life experience&#8221;!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexa Mancha</title>
		<link>http://www.venganza.org/2005/08/18/this-part-of-your-website.htm#comment-2273</link>
		<author>Alexa Mancha</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Sep 2006 10:58:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.venganza.org/2005/08/18/this-part-of-your-website.htm#comment-2273</guid>
		<description>Whatever. the issue here is that religion should only be taught maybe in a religion class if it is a must to teach it in schools, but NOT in science classes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whatever. the issue here is that religion should only be taught maybe in a religion class if it is a must to teach it in schools, but NOT in science classes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
